The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity☆
Abstract
Contemporary moral psychology often emphasizes the universality of moral judgments. Across age, gender, religion and ethnicity, people's judgments on classic dilemmas are sensitive to the same moral principles. In many cases, moral judgments depend not only on the outcome of the action, but on the agent's beliefs and intentions at the time of action. For example, we blame agents who attempt but fail to harm others, while generally forgiving agents who harm others accidentally and unknowingly. Nevertheless, as we report here, there are individual differences in the extent to which observers exculpate agents for accidental harms. Furthermore, we find that the extent to which innocent intentions are taken to mitigate blame for accidental harms is correlated with activation in a specific brain region during moral judgment. This brain region, the right temporo-parietal junction, has been previously implicated in reasoning about other people's thoughts, beliefs, and intentions in moral and non-moral contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Activity in the RTPJ while participants make moral judgments about attempted and accidental harms shows the same asymmetry: greater activity for attempted than accidental harms (9, 10, 24, 25).”
From Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments (2010) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., Nugent, T. F., Herman, D. H., Clasen, L. S., Toga, A. W., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402680101 · Cited by 5,604 · cited 1×
“Consistent with this hypothesis, recent research suggests the RTPJ may be late maturing (cf. Blakemore, 2008; Gogtay et al., 2004).”
ResultAn fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062872 · Cited by 4,561
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,409
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041 · Cited by 3,561
The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 · Cited by 2,913
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · Cited by 2,620
People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 4×
“…session, subjects participated in four runs of a theory of mind (mental state reasoning) localizer experiment, contrasting stories requiring inferences about mental states (e.g., thoughts, beliefs) versus physical representations (e.g., outdated photographs, maps, signs; Saxe & Kanwisher, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCan cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
POLDRACK, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 · Cited by 2,249
Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.
Epstein, S. J., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390 · Cited by 1,928
The social brain in adolescence
Blakemore, S.-J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2353 · Cited by 1,896
Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct
Weiner, B. L. (1995) · Cited by 1,660
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05631 · Cited by 1,545
Self-citationOther minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00053-6 · Cited by 1,394
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & HAUSER, M. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x · Cited by 1,061
Self-citationDissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040 · Cited by 1,023
Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective
Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Zilles, K. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0789 · Cited by 998
Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment
Cushman, F. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006 · Cited by 990
The neural basis of human moral cognition
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1768 · Cited by 930 · cited 1×
“Undoubtedly, other brain regions (e.g., LTPJ), other cognitive processes (e.g., cognitive control, emotional empathy, emotion regulation), and other specific mental state factors (e.g., desires, goals, intentions) also contribute to moral judgment (Farrow et al., 2001; Heekeren, Wartenburger, Schmidt, Schwintowski, &…”
BackgroundMaking sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction
SAXE, R., & WEXLER, A. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013 · Cited by 926
Self-citationUniversal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future
Mikhail, J. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007 · Cited by 923
It's the Thought That Counts: Specific Brain Regions for One Component of Theory of Mind
Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x · Cited by 815
Self-citationUnderstanding Other Minds: Linking Developmental Psychology and Functional Neuroimaging
Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044 · Cited by 726
Self-citationA Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
HAUSER, M., CUSHMAN, F., YOUNG, L., KANG‐XING JIN, R., & MIKHAIL, J. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x · Cited by 666
Self-citationThe neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment
Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104 · Cited by 625 · cited 3×
“Previously, we suggested that regions for cognitive control were recruited more robustly for accidental harm than for intentional harm (Young et al., 2007), though this pattern did not replicate in the current study.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationKoenigs, M. R., & Tranel, D. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4606-06.2007 · Cited by 617
Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers
Saxe, R., Brett, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.062 · Cited by 544
Self-citationTwo Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks
Gobbini, M. I., Koralek, A. C., Bryan, R. E., Montgomery, K. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1803 · Cited by 436
Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsm001 · Cited by 436
Moore, A., Clark, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x · Cited by 425
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02673.x · Cited by 414
An Investigation of Moral Judgement in Frontotemporal Dementia
Mendez, M. F., Anderson, E., & Shapira, J. S. (2005) · Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology · doi:10.1097/01.wnn.0000191292.17964.bb · Cited by 360
Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An fMRI Investigation
Schaich Borg, J., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803 · Cited by 355
The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency
Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153651 · Cited by 354
Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness
Farrow, T. F. D., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Spence, S. A., Deakin, J. F. W., Tarrier, N., Griffiths, P. D., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200108080-00029 · Cited by 330
Other Useful Nonparametric Correlations
(2002) · doi:10.4135/9781412983808.n1 · Cited by 328
Religion and the morality of mentality.
Cohen, A. B., & Rozin, P. N. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.697 · Cited by 306
The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions
Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. G., & Walter, H. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.011 · Cited by 277
The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057 · Cited by 277
Self-citationAn fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making
Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Schwintowski, H.-P., & Villringer, A. (2003) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200307010-00005 · Cited by 263
Intention, Act, and Outcome in Behavioral Prediction and Moral Judgment
Zelazo, P. D., Helwig, C. C., & Lau, A. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01869.x · Cited by 257
Thinking of mental and other representations: The roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction.
Perner, J., Aichhorn, M., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910600989896 · Cited by 245
Brain regions for perceiving and reasoning about other people in school-aged children
Saxe, R. R., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Scholz, J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01325.x · Cited by 234
Self-citationDo visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?
Aichhorn, M., Perner, J., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.026 · Cited by 227
An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics.
Petrinovich, L. F., O'Neill, P., & Jorgensen, M. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.467 · Cited by 223
An fMRI Investigation of Spontaneous Mental State Inference for Moral Judgment
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21137 · Cited by 208
Self-citationBrief report: Morality in the autistic child
James, R., & Blair, J. (1996) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172277 · Cited by 208
Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited
Nichols, S., & Ulatowski, J. W. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00312.x · Cited by 203
The role of mental state understanding in the development of moral cognition and moral action
Baird, J. A., & Astington, J. W. (2004) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.96 · Cited by 197
Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections
Knobe, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.011 · Cited by 186
Young, L., & Koenigs, M. R. (2007) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldm031 · Cited by 182
Self-citationChildren's use of intention cues in evaluating behavior.
Karniol, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.76 · Cited by 175
Young children's coordination of motive and outcome in judgements of satisfaction and morality
Yuill, N. (1984) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1984.tb00536.x · Cited by 146
Less Thought, More Punishment: Need for Cognition Predicts Support for Punitive Responses to Crime
Sargent, M. J. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264481 · Cited by 140
The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Philosophical and Experimental Issues
Machery, É. (2008) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00336.x · Cited by 137
Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism?
Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R., & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910600992197 · Cited by 124
Yuill, N., & Perner, J. (1988) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.358 · Cited by 123
Assignment of Moral Responsibility and Punishment
Shultz, T. R., Wright, K. L., & Sehleifer, M. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00018.x · Cited by 120
The influence of prior record on moral judgment
Kliemann, D., Young, L., Scholz, J., & Saxe, R. R. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.010 · Cited by 90
Self-citationAttribution of responsibility to the self and other in children and adults.
Fincham, F., & Jaspars, J. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1589 · Cited by 83
THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN'S JUDGMENT OF INTENT
Hebble, P. W. (1971) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1971.tb02014.x · Cited by 79
Do Preschoolers Appreciate That Identical Actions May Be Motivated by Different Intentions?
Baird, J. A., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0204_4 · Cited by 71
A Preliminary Cross-Cultural Study of Moral Intuitions
O’Neill, P., & Petrinovich, L. F. (1998) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(98)00030-0 · Cited by 67
Darley, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 53
The Development of Children's Integration Rules for Making Moral Judgments
Grueneich, R. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1982.tb01350.x · Cited by 36
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A. R., Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y · Cited by 653
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.877340 · Cited by 632
Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914826107 · Cited by 584
Self-citationTheory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem
Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.020 · Cited by 513
Self-citationThe accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, L., & Saxe, R.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Liane
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2065-2072
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104698746
- Semantic Scholar
- c2b5c3e3d88e1e12a3dacfb86b433205fa758d50
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- accidental harm, moral judgment, intention, forgiveness, blame, right temporoparietal junction, individual differences, moral reasoning, theory of mind
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Morals, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Statistics as Topic, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
