Cited by 98Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

New Insights into Microglia–Neuron Interactions: A Neuron’s Perspective

Pósfai, Balázs, Cserép, Csaba, Orsolits, Barbara, Dénes, Ádám·2019·Neuroscience

Abstract

Microglia are the primary immune cells of the central nervous system. However, recent data indicate that microglia also contribute to diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes that extend beyond immune-related functions and there is a growing interest to understand the mechanisms through which microglia interact with other cells in the brain. In particular, the molecular processes that contribute to microglia-neuron communication in the healthy brain and their role in common brain diseases have been intensively studied during the last decade. In line with this, fate-mapping studies, genetic models and novel pharmacological approaches have revealed the origin of microglial progenitors, demonstrated the role of self-maintaining microglial populations during brain development or in adulthood, and identified the unexpectedly long lifespan of microglia that may profoundly change our view about senescence and age-related human diseases. Despite the exponentially increasing knowledge about microglia, the role of these cells in health and disease is still extremely controversial and the precise molecular targets for intervention are not well defined. This is in part due to the lack of microglia-specific manipulation approaches until very recently and to the high level of complexity of the interactions between microglia and other cells in the brain that occur at different temporal and spatial scales. In this review, we briefly summarize the known physiological roles of microglia-neuron interactions in brain homeostasis and attempt to outline some major directions and challenges of future microglia research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.046

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models are largely inaccessible to real-time imaging and timely microglia manipulation.

    “However, animal models are largely inaccessible to real-time imaging and timely microglia manipulation.15”

    From Acoustofluidic assembly of 3D neurospheroids to model Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    The “Challenges and future directions of microglia research” section calls for models that can selectively induce or inhibit microglial activation in real time, supporting a limitation in timely manipulation. But the same section describes in vivo two-photon imaging techniques as widely used, so it does not support the claim that animal models are largely inaccessible to real-time imaging. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Farzanehfar P (2018) Comparative review of adult midbrain and striatum neurogenesis with classical neurogenesis. Neurosci Res.
  2. Mallard C, Tremblay M-E, Vexler ZS (2018) Microglia and neonatal brain injury. Neuroscience Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306452218300393.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pósfai, B., Cserép, C., Orsolits, B., & Dénes, Á.
Affiliations
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine (HU)
Corresponding author
Dénes, Ádám
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
405
Pages
103-117
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803508229
Cited by
98
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2016-4/2016)
  • ERC-CoG (724994)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microglia, microglia-neuron interaction, microglial origin, microglial senescence, brain homeostasis, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, brain development
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Diseases, Cell Communication, Homeostasis, Humans, Neurons, Synapses, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review