Cited by 38Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Interaction between the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampal CA1 area is essential for episodic-like memory in rats

Chao, Owen Y., Nikolaus, Susanne, Lira Brandão, Marcus, Huston, Joseph P., de Souza Silva, Maria A.·2017·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

The interplay between medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus, particularly the hippocampal CA3 area, is critical for episodic memory. To what extent the mPFC also interacts with the hippocampus CA1 subregion still requires elucidation. To investigate this issue, male rats received unilateral N-methyl-D-aspartate lesions of the mPFC together with unilateral lesions of the hippocampal CA1 area, either in the same (control) or in the opposite hemispheres (disconnection). They underwent an episodic-like memory test, combining what-where-when information, and separate tests for novel object preference (what), object place preference (where) and temporal order memory (when). Compared to controls, the disconnected mPFC-CA1 rats exhibited disrupted episodic-like memory with an impaired integration of the what-where-when elements. Both groups showed intact memories for what and when, while only the control group showed intact memory for where. These findings suggest that the functional interaction of the mPFC-CA1 circuit is crucial for the processing of episodic memory and, in particular, for the integration of the spatial memory component.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.019

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chao, O. Y., Nikolaus, S., Lira Brandão, M., Huston, J. P., & de Souza Silva, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Huston, Joseph P.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
141
Pages
72-77
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605212557
Cited by
38
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heisenberg Fellowship (SO 1032/5-1)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeischaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampal CA1, episodic-like memory, NMDA lesions, spatial memory, temporal order memory, novel object recognition, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Neural Pathways, N-Methylaspartate, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review