Cited by 41Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Evidence for a specific integrative mechanism for episodic memory mediated by AMPA/kainate receptors in a circuit involving medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampal CA3 region

de Souza Silva, Maria A., Huston, Joseph P., Wang, An-Li, Petri, David, Chao, Owen Yuan-Hsin·2016·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

We asked whether episodic-like memory requires neural mechanisms independent of those that mediate its component memories for "what," "when," and "where," and if neuronal connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the hippocampus (HPC) CA3 subregion is essential for episodic-like memory. Unilateral lesion of the mPFC was combined with unilateral lesion of the CA3 in the ipsi- or contralateral hemispheres in rats. Episodic-like memory was tested using a task, which assesses the integration of memories for "what, where, and when" concomitantly. Tests for novel object recognition (what), object place (where), and temporal order memory (when) were also applied. Bilateral disconnection of the mPFC-CA3 circuit by N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) lesions disrupted episodic-like memory, but left the component memories for object, place, and temporal order, per se, intact. Furthermore, unilateral NMDA lesion of the CA3 plus injection of (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione) (CNQX) (AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist), but not AP-5 (NMDA receptor antagonist), into the contralateral mPFC also disrupted episodic-like memory, indicating the mPFC AMPA/kainate receptors as critical for this circuit. These results argue for a selective neural system that specifically subserves episodic memory, as it is not critically involved in the control of its component memories for object, place, and time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhv112

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Souza Silva, M. A., Huston, J. P., Wang, A.-L., Petri, D., & Chao, O. Y.-H.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
3000-3009
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2308904057
Cited by
41
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
episodic-like memory, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampal CA3, non-NMDA receptors, NMDA lesions, CNQX, novel object recognition, temporal order memory, memory integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Neural Pathways, Time Perception, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, AMPA, Kainic Acid Receptors, Receptors, Kainic Acid, Neurotransmitter Agents, Recognition, Psychology, CA3 Region, Hippocampal, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review