Cited by 110Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Hippocampal output area CA1 broadcasts a generalized novelty signal during an object-place recognition task

Open access
Larkin, Margaret Carr, Lykken, Christine, Tye, Lynne D., Wickelgren, Jeanette Graham, Frank, Loren M.·2014·Hippocampus

Abstract

Animals display an innate preference for novelty, spending more time exploring both novel objects and familiar objects in novel locations. This increase in exploration is thought to allow the animal to gather the information necessary to encode new experiences. Despite extensive evidence that increased exploration following spatial change requires the hippocampus, the pattern of hippocampal activity that supports this behavior remains unknown. We examined activity in hippocampal output area CA1 and one synapse upstream in area CA3 while freely behaving rats performed an object-place recognition task. We found that the presence of novelty substantially altered activity in CA1, but not in CA3. During exploration of displaced familiar objects and novel objects in unexpected locations, CA1 place cells showed robust increases in firing rate. These firing rate increases persisted during sharp wave ripples, when place cell representations of previous experiences are replayed. Unexpectedly, increases in CA1 activity were not spatially restricted to regions of the environment that underwent change, indicating a generalized novelty signal. We suggest that hippocampal area CA1 broadcasts the presence of novelty, rather than signaling what is novel, and simultaneously becomes more plastic, allowing the integration of new information into previously stored memories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.22268

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larkin, M. C., Lykken, C., Tye, L. D., Wickelgren, J. G., & Frank, L. M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Frank, Loren M.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-21
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
773-783
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2119298323
Cited by
110
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH090188, RO1MH080283, F31093067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampal CA1, CA3, place cells, sharp-wave ripples, memory replay, spatial exploration, hippocampal plasticity, memory integration, rats
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, CA3 Region, Hippocampal, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review