Cited by 466Personality Traits and PsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the big 5.

Vernon, Philip A., Villani, Vanessa C., Vickers, Leanne C., Harris, Julie Aitken·2008·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissism has a substantial genetic contribution (h2 = .59) that is strongly linked with interpersonal antagonism.

    “In a behavioral genetic analysis of the dark triad, narcissism was found to have a substantial genetic contribution (i.e., h 2 = .59,where h 2 is broad-sense heritability) that was strongly linked with interpersonal antagonism (Vernon et al. 2008).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Vernon et al. 2008

  • There is substantial genetic correlation between grandiose narcissism and extraversion (rg = 0.42).

    “However, there is substantial genetic correlation between grandiose narcissism and extraversion (rg = 0.42)”

    From The Relationship between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Vernon et al., 2008

  • Observed correlations between the Dark Triad and the Big 5 are largely attributable to the influence of the same genes.

    “which means that “observed correlations […] between the Dark Triad and the Big 5 are largely attributable to the influence of the same genes” (ibid., p. 451).”

    From The Relationship between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Vernon et al., 2008

  • Behavioral genetic twin studies estimate the heritability of (grandiose) narcissism similar to that of intro-/extraversion (e.g., a2 = 0.59).

    “It has to be noted, though, that behavioral genetic twin studies estimate the heritability of (grandiose) narcissism similar to that of intro-/extraversion (e.g., a2 = 0.59; Vernon et al., 2008)”

    From The Relationship between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Vernon et al., 2008

  • The DT traits are significantly inter-correlated with considerable convergent correlations between subscales.

    “Nevertheless, the DT traits are significantly inter-correlated (18) with considerable convergent correlations between subscales (19).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vernon, Philip A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
445-452
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085705505
Cited by
466
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Dark Triad, Big Five personality traits, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, heritability, genetic factors, nonshared environment, shared environment, twin studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review