Cited by 13Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Structure of darkness: the dark triad, the dark” empathy and the dark’ narcissism.

Open access
Gojković, Vesna, Dostanić, Jelena S., Đurić, Veljko·2022·Primenjena psihologija

Abstract

While it is universally agreed that empathy deficit is a necessary condition for the dark roster membership, the literature provides no consensus regarding differential associations between individual Dark Triad traits with cognitive and affective empathy. With this in mind, we have investigated topology of the network consisting of Affective and Cognitive Measure of Empathy, Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire, and Short Dark Triad traits (SD3). The network analysis disclosed cohesive configuration of multiply connected study variables, thus confirming their aversive coaction. Two main axes of study variables were identified: the ‘dark’ affective dissonance-rivalry-psychopathy axis, and the ‘brighter’ admiration-SD3 narcissism axis; each characterized by its specific manifestation of empathic deficit. Affective dissonance was the most central while affective resonance was the most redundant node of the network. Rivalry — a node connecting the two axes — had the greatest strength in the network and was closer to affective dissonance than to psychopathy. Involvement of affective dissonance uncovered the dual nature of Machiavellianism by shifting it away from psychopathy and closer to narcissism. Overall, by use of structural information not accessible by other means, this study substantiates the proposition about the essential role of distinct empathic deficits in the constellation of antagonistic traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19090/pp.v15i2.2380

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rivalry, but not psychopathy, was the strongest trait of the dark core.

    “Rivalry, but not psychopathy, was the strongest trait of the dark core.”
  • Narcissism is among the malevolent traits of the Dark Triad, together with psychopathy and Machiavellianism.

    “Narcissism is among malevolent traits of the Dark Triad (43), together with psychopathy and Machiavellianism.”
  • Significant fluctuations in NPD empathic skills might be affected by self-regulation, increased when they feel confident and decreased when they are exposed or threatened.

    “Furthermore, significant fluctuations in NPD empathic skills might be affected by self-regulation, increased when they feel confident and decreased when they are exposed or threatened (43).”

    From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Introduction and the section on narcissistic admiration and rivalry discuss differing associations between narcissistic traits and empathy, not fluctuations in empathy within people with NPD. Searches for self-regulation, confidence, exposure, and threat found no passage linking those circumstances to changes in empathic skills; no page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Machiavellianism. Academic Press, Incorporated.
  2. Dinić, B.M, & Wertag, A. (2017, July). The Dark Tetrad network. Poster presented at the ISSID 2017 Conference, Warsaw, Poland.
  3. Rogoza, R., Kowalski, C. M., & Schermer, J. A. (2019). Dark Triad Traits Within the Framework of the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Model. Journal of Individual Differences, 40(3), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a00028 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gojković, V., Dostanić, J. S., & Đurić, V.
Affiliations
  • Union University (RS)
  • University of Novi Sad (RS)
Venue
Primenjena psihologija
Published
2022-05-25
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
237-268
ISSN
  • 1821-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-7287
OpenAlex
W4281705120
Cited by
13
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primenjena psihologija (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
Dark Triad, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissistic admiration, rivalry, affective dissonance, affective resonance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review