Cited by 233Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and brain activity involved in reappraisal of emotion

Open access
Modinos, Gemma, Ormel, Johan, Aleman, André·2010·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

The regulation of negative emotion through reappraisal has been shown to induce increased prefrontal activity and decreased amygdala activity. Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness reflect differences in typical recognition, detachment and regulation of current experience, thought to also operate as top-down control mechanism. We sought to investigate whether such individual differences would be associated with brain activity elicited during reappraisal of negative emotion. Eighteen healthy participants completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging task that involved attending to or reappraising negative stimuli, and provided emotion experience ratings after each trial. Dispositional mindfulness was assessed with a self-report questionnaire. Reappraisal induced activity in a brain network involving predominantly dorsal portions of the prefrontal cortex, replicating previous studies. A voxelwise regression analysis showed that individual differences in the tendency to be mindful predicted activity in neural regions underlying reappraisal, with dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activation increasing with more mindfulness traits. Notably, this prefrontal activation was inversely correlated with the amygdala response to negative scenes, further supporting its role in down-regulating emotion-generation regions. These findings suggest that individual differences in dispositional mindfulness, which reflect the tendency to recognize and regulate current states, may modulate activity in neural systems involved in the effective cognitive control of negative emotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsq006

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have shown substantially lower activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex during reappraisal in mindfulness meditators.

    “However other studies have shown opposite results, that is, a substantially lower activity in dmPFC during reappraisal in mindfulness meditators [71, 72].”

    From Mindful emotion regulation: Exploring the neurocognitive mechanisms behind mindfulness (2015) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction says the participants were meditation-naïve, not mindfulness meditators. The Conclusions report that dispositional mindfulness was positively associated with DMPFC activity during reappraisal—the opposite of the claimed lower activity. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individual differences in attachment orientation and dispositional mindfulness have been implicated as contributing factors to an individual's ER capacity.

    “Individual differences in attachment orientation and dispositional mindfulness have been implicated as contributing factors to an individual's ER capacity (Modinos et al., 2010).”

    From Facets of Mindfulness Mediate the Relationship Between Attachment Orientation and Emotion Regulation in University Students (2024) · cites this paper as Modinos et al., 2010

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that individual differences in dispositional mindfulness may influence neural interactions involved in emotion regulation. The cited paper does not address attachment orientation, so it supports only the mindfulness part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In active tasks, self-reported trait mindfulness correlates with affective reactivity.

    “In these cases, self-reported trait mindfulness correlates with affective reactivity.”
  • Modinos et al. instructed participants to reappraise negative IAPS pictures or attend to them; individual differences in self-reported trait mindfulness correlated positively with prefrontal activation during reappraisal versus attending, and prefrontal activation correlated negatively with amygdala activation.

    “For example, Modinos et al. [60] instructed participants to either reappraise negative IAPS pictures or to attend to them. Individual differences in self-reported trait mindfulness correlated positively with prefrontal activation during reappraisal (vs. attending), and the prefrontal activation correlated negatively with amygdala activation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modinos, G., Ormel, J., & Aleman, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
369-377
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2125343452
Cited by
233
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation (044035001)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (044035001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
trait mindfulness, emotion reappraisal, negative emotion regulation, individual differences, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, top-down control, cognitive control, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Affect, Amygdala, Awareness, Brain, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychological Tests, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review