Cited by 164Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and PsychologyBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Social networking site use and self-esteem: a meta-analytic review

Saiphoo, Alyssa N., Dahoah Halevi, Lilach, Vahedi, Zahra·2020·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109639

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SNSs use is negatively associated with both global and physical self-esteem.

    “a substantial body of evidence demonstrates that SNSs use is negatively associated with both global (Andreassen et al., 2017; Liu and Baumeister, 2016; Saiphoo et al., 2020) and physical self-esteem (Fardouly and Vartanian, 2016; Saiphoo et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saiphoo, A. N., Dahoah Halevi, L., & Vahedi, Z.
Affiliations
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Saiphoo, Alyssa N.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
153
Pages
109639
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982386365
Cited by
164
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6
FWCI
22.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
social networking sites, self-esteem, social media addiction, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review