Cited by 385Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPersonality Traits and Psychology

How many likes did I get?: purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem

Burrow, Anthony L., Rainone, Nicolette·2017·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Burrow, Anthony L.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
69
Pages
232-236
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520125809
Cited by
385
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5
FWCI
49.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem, meaning of life, social media feedback, likes, sociometer theory, prosocial motivation, Facebook, social acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review