Cited by 112Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorEating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 357 of the 358 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neuropharmacology of relapse to food seeking: Methodology, main findings, and comparison with relapse to drug seeking

Open access
Nair, Sunila G., Adams-Deutsch, Tristan, Epstein, David H., Shaham, Yavin·2009·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Relapse to old, unhealthy eating habits is a major problem in human dietary treatments. The mechanisms underlying this relapse are unknown. Surprisingly, until recently this clinical problem has not been systematically studied in animal models. Here, we review results from recent studies in which a reinstatement model (commonly used to study relapse to abused drugs) was employed to characterize the effect of pharmacological agents on relapse to food seeking induced by either food priming (non-contingent exposure to small amounts of food), cues previously associated with food, or injections of the pharmacological stressor yohimbine. We also address methodological issues related to the use of the reinstatement model to study relapse to food seeking, similarities and differences in mechanisms underlying reinstatement of food seeking versus drug seeking, and the degree to which the reinstatement procedure provides a suitable model for studying relapse in humans. We conclude by discussing implications for medication development and future research. We offer three tentative conclusions: (1)The neuronal mechanisms of food-priming- and cue-induced reinstatement are likely different from those of reinstatement induced by the pharmacological stressor yohimbine. (2)The neuronal mechanisms of reinstatement of food seeking are possibly different from those of ongoing food-reinforced operant responding. (3)The neuronal mechanisms underlying reinstatement of food seeking overlap to some degree with those of reinstatement of drug seeking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.05.003

Cites

357 of 357 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 358 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baker, 1991, Contexual conditioning and reinstatement of extinguished instrumental responding, Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 43B, 199
  2. Bremner, 1996, Noradrenergic mechanisms in stress and anxiety. II. Clinical studies, Synapse, 23, 39, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199605)23:1<39::AID-SYN5>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  3. Langlois, 2005, In vivo receptor occupancy profile of aripiprazole in rat brain, Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts, 444, 3
  4. Martin-Fardon, 2007, Differential effects of sigma1 receptor blockade on self-administration and conditioned reinstatement motivated by cocaine vs natural reward, Neuropsychopharmacology., 32, 1967, 10.1038/sj.npp.1301323 · DOI
  5. Nair, S., Adams-Deustch, T., Pickens, C., Smith, D., Shaham, Y., in press. Effect of the melenin concentrating hormone receptor 1 antagonist SNAP 94847 on food self-administration and relapse to food seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nair, S. G., Adams-Deutsch, T., Epstein, D. H., & Shaham, Y.
Affiliations
National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Shaham, Yavin
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
18-45
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974100279
Cited by
112
References
358
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (Z01DA000434)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food cues, yohimbine, reinstatement of drug seeking, neuropharmacology, dietary therapy, food addiction, neural mechanisms, pharmacological stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Neuropharmacology, Yohimbine, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review