Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanochemical synthesis of metal–organic frameworks

Chen, Dong, Zhao, Jiahua, Zhang, Pengfei, Dai, Sheng·2019·Polyhedron
DOI 10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.024
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), constructed from metal ions/clusters and multidentate organic linkers via coordination bonding, are of growing interest due to their potential uses in gas adsorption, separation, and catalysis. Regarding the synthesis of MOFs, the past decade has seen a reawakening of mechanochemical synthesis (MS), driven by the search for new, cleaner synthetic methodologies. In the mini review, we will summarize the typical advances in the MS of MOFs over the last two decades.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.024

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Chen, D., Zhao, J., Zhang, P., & Dai, S.
Venue
Polyhedron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
162
Pages
59-64
ISSN
0277-5387 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.024
OpenAlex
W2909104698
Cited by
285
References
52
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.