Cited by 365Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A sniff of trust: Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on face recognition, trust to in-group, and trust to out-group

Open access
Van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.·2012·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

The neuropeptide oxytocin has a popular reputation of being the 'love' hormone. Here we test meta-analytically whether experiments with intranasal administration of oxytocin provide support for the proposed effects of oxytocin. Three psychological effects were subjected to meta-analysis: facial emotion recognition (13 effect sizes, N=408), in-group trust (8 effect sizes, N=317), and out-group trust (10 effect sizes; N=505). We found that intranasal oxytocin administration enhances the recognition of facial expressions of emotions, and that it elevates the level of in-group trust. The hypothesis that out-group trust is significantly decreased in the oxytocin condition was not supported. It is concluded that a sniff of oxytocin can change emotion perception and behavior in trusting relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.008

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
438-443
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973561392
Cited by
365
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (453-09-003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, intranasal administration, face recognition (cognition), facial emotion recognition, trust, in-group trust, outgroup trust, social cognition, neuropeptides
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Clinical Trials as Topic, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Peer Group, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review