Cited by 698Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Oxytocin Increases Retention of Social Cognition in Autism

Hollander, Eric, Bartz, Jennifer, Chaplin, William, Phillips, Ann, Sumner, Jennifer, Soorya, Latha, Anagnostou, Evdokia, Wasserman, Stacey·2007·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Oxytocin dysfunction might contribute to the development of social deficits in autism, a core symptom domain and potential target for intervention. This study explored the effect of intravenous oxytocin administration on the retention of social information in autism.Methods Oxytocin and placebo challenges were administered to 15 adult subjects diagnosed with autism or Asperger's disorder, and comprehension of affective speech (happy, indifferent, angry, and sad) in neutral content sentences was tested.Results All subjects showed improvements in affective speech comprehension from pre- to post-infusion; however, whereas those who received placebo first tended to revert to baseline after a delay, those who received oxytocin first retained the ability to accurately assign emotional significance to speech intonation on the speech comprehension task.Conclusions These results are consistent with studies linking oxytocin to social recognition in rodents as well as studies linking oxytocin to prosocial behavior in humans and suggest that oxytocin might facilitate social information processing in those with autism. These findings also provide preliminary support for the use of oxytocin in the treatment of autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.030

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hollander, E., Bartz, J., Chaplin, W., Phillips, A., Sumner, J., Soorya, L., Anagnostou, E., & Wasserman, S.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • St. John's University (US)
Corresponding author
Hollander, Eric
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
498-503
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080326011
Cited by
693
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 51
FWCI
31.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U54MH066673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
oxytocin, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, social cognition, intonation, social information processing, social recognition, prosocial behavior, autism treatment, placebo effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Retention, Psychology, Social Behavior, Speech, Cross-Over Studies, Asperger Syndrome, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review