Cited by 1,411Zebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis

Open access

Abstract

The zebrafish is a useful model for understanding normal and cancer stem cells, but analysis has been limited to embryogenesis due to the opacity of the adult fish. To address this, we have created a transparent adult zebrafish in which we transplanted either hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells or tumor cells. In a hematopoiesis radiation recovery assay, transplantation of GFP-labeled marrow cells allowed for striking in vivo visual assessment of engraftment from 2 hr-5 weeks posttransplant. Using FACS analysis, both transparent and wild-type fish had equal engraftment, but this could only be visualized in the transparent recipient. In a tumor engraftment model, transplantation of RAS-melanoma cells allowed for visualization of tumor engraftment, proliferation, and distant metastases in as little as 5 days, which is not seen in wild-type recipients until 3 to 4 weeks. This transparent adult zebrafish serves as the ideal combination of both sensitivity and resolution for in vivo stem cell analyses.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

White et al. generated a doubly mutant zebrafish line, *casper* (*nacre*;*roy*), that lacks melanocytes and iridophores and is transparent throughout adulthood, enabling in vivo visualization of transplanted hematopoietic and tumor cells. Using this line, they tracked HSPC engraftment to the kidney marrow and detected melanoma engraftment and distant metastasis far earlier than in wild-type recipients.

Key findings

  • *casper* fish (homozygous *nacre* and *roy*) completely lack melanocytes and iridophores in embryogenesis and adulthood; organs including heart, intestinal tube, liver, and gallbladder are visible by standard stereomicroscopy, and ventricular contraction can be observed. The line is viable, with incrossed adults producing offspring at expected Mendelian ratios and no heterozygous phenotype.
  • After intracardiac transplantation of 100,000 beta-actin:GFP whole kidney marrow cells into a 25 Gy–irradiated *casper* recipient, GFP-labeled cells were visible in the kidney region and gill vasculature by 2 weeks and largely confined to the kidney by 4 weeks; FACS showed equal multilineage engraftment in *casper* and wild-type recipients, but only *casper* allowed visualization. Anti-GFP IHC confirmed homing of donor cells to kidney marrow.
  • Confocal imaging of transplanted *casper* fish resolved single cells and clusters at ~5 μm, with a maximal depth of field of 88 μm from the skin surface; no discernible GFP signal was obtainable in wild-type recipients.
  • In tumor transplants, 200,000 disaggregated NRAS-GFP or BRAF;p53 melanoma cells injected IP or intracardiac produced visible tumor masses within 5 days in *casper*, versus 2–3 weeks in wild-type; 9/24 (37.5%) of BRAF;p53 recipients showed distant metastasis between 5 and 28 days, peaking at 5–10 days, with one tumor volume measured at 1496 mm³ by 3D calculation.

Methods

  • Design: generation and characterization of a compound pigmentation mutant zebrafish line, followed by transplantation assays for hematopoietic and tumor cells.
  • Sample/data: wild-type (AB), tg(beta-actin:GFP), *roy orbison*, *panther/rose*, *nacre*, *golden*, *albino*, and p53 lines; tg(mitf:NRAS-GFP) and tg(mitf:BRAF) melanoma donors crossed to p53−/−. Recipients irradiated with 25 Gy two days before transplant; 5 μl of 100,000 cells/μl marrow or 50,000 cells/μl tumor suspension injected intracardially or intraperitoneally.
  • Analysis: stereomicroscopy (Zeiss Discovery V8), confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM Meta), H&E and Masson's trichrome histology, anti-GFP immunohistochemistry, and FACS of kidney marrow for forward/side scatter and GFP.

Limitations

  • Stated: the line requires both mutations in the homozygous state, needing at least two breeding cycles to use existing transgenic lines; the *roy* mutation is unknown, so it may affect unknown aspects of tumor or stem cell biology (though it does not affect survival); imaging very deep tissues may require multiphoton microscopy, which is experimental in zebrafish.
  • Evident from the text: the metastasis mechanism is described as unclear, and the authors note the early dissemination may reflect accumulated genetic changes in donor tumors present for over a month; the tumor volume of 1496 mm³ is reported for a single representative fish.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

12 of 24 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 43 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Analysis of adult zebrafish has been limited to embryogenesis due to the opacity of the adult fish.

    “The zebrafish is a useful model for understanding normal and cancer stem cells, but analysis has been limited to embryogenesis due to the opacity of the adult fish.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The in vivo spatial resolution of the adult animal is limited due to the normal opacification of skin and subdermal structures.

    “As in murine and human systems, however, the in vivo spatial resolution of the adult animal is limited due to the normal opacification of skin and subdermal structures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current in vivo imaging techniques such as bioluminescence, PET, CT, or MRI each have specific disadvantages in terms of resolution, sensitivity, or the need for costly equipment.

    “Current in vivo imaging techniques, such as bioluminescence, PET, CT, or MRI, each have specific disadvantages in terms of resolution, sensitivity, or the need for costly equipment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The in vivo behavior of stem cell populations is considerably more complex than in vitro models can offer.

    “Because the in vivo behavior of stem cell populations is considerably more complex than in vitro models can offer, we now describe a transparent adult zebrafish model”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluorescent imaging, though widely available and standard for gene function analysis in zebrafish embryos, is of limited use in adult wild-type zebrafish.

    “Fluorescent imaging is widely available and is a standard method of analysis of gene function in zebrafish embryos; image acquisition is rapid, but is of limited use in adult wild-type zebrafish.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The adult zebrafish is well suited to genetic and small molecule based screens.

    “Because the adult zebrafish is well suited to genetic and small molecule based screens”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Traver, 2004, Effects of lethal irradiation in zebrafish and rescue by hematopoietic cell transplantation, Blood, 104, 1298, 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0100 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,411

Metadata

Authors
White, R. M., Sessa, A., Burke, C., Bowman, T., LeBlanc, J., Ceol, C., Bourque, C., Dovey, M., Goessling, W., Burns, C. E., & Zon, L. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Zon, Leonard I.
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
183-189
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2019751519
Cited by
1,408
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 52
FWCI
17.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA103846)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK053298)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, engraftment, metastasis, cancer stem cells, transgenic zebrafish
MeSH terms
Albinism, Animals, Flow Cytometry, Light, Neoplasm Transplantation, Pigmentation, Stem Cells, Zebrafish, Models, Animal, Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review