Cited by 58Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy

Young, Larry J., Hammock, Elizabeth A.D.·2007·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Comparative studies in voles have suggested that a polymorphic microsatellite upstream of the Avpr1a locus contributes to the evolution of monogamy. A recent study challenged this hypothesis by reporting that there is no relationship between microsatellite structure and monogamy in 21 vole species. Although the study demonstrates that the microsatellite is not a universal genetic switch that determines mating strategy, the findings do not preclude a substantial role for Avpr1a in regulating social behaviors associated with monogamy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.010

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A polymorphic microsatellite element located near proximal regulatory regions of Avpr1a may contribute to the variation in AVPR1A distribution in the brain.

    “First identified in comparative genomic studies between prairie and montane voles, a polymorphic microsatellite element located near proximal regulatory regions of Avpr1a may contribute to the variation in AVPR1A distribution in the brain [29, 30].”
  • Length per se does not predict social organization of other Microtus species.

    “However, it is now known that length per se does not predict social organization of other Microtus species [29, 32], and sequence variation within the microsatellite may have a greater influence on expression than length itself [3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, L. J., & Hammock, E. A. D.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Larry J.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
209-212
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973720597
Cited by
58
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-64692, K02MH064692, MH 56897)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
monogamy, AVPR1A, vasopressin 1a receptor, microsatellite markers, voles, mating systems, evolution of social behavior, genetic polymorphism, comparative genomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Arvicolinae, Forecasting, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Genetic, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Behavior, Receptors, Vasopressin, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review