Cited by 47Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Culex pipiens as a potential vector for transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and other unclassified Filarioidea in Southwest Spain

Bravo-Barriga, Daniel, Parreira, Ricardo, Almeida, António P.G., Calado, Manuela, Blanco-Ciudad, Juan, Serrano-Aguilera, Francisco Javier, Pérez-Martín, Juan Enrique, Sánchez-Peinado, Joaquín +3 more·2016·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Dirofilaria immitis is one of the most frequently detected mosquito-transmitted zoonotic filarioid nematode in mammals in Europe, being canine dirofilariosis a major animal health problem, endemic in the Mediterranean area. This study, focused on Southwest Spain, in order to bring new insights into (i) the epidemiology of Dirofilaria spp., (ii) the species of Culicid vectors possibly involved in their transmission and (iii) the genetic variability of those potential vectors. A total of 881 adult female mosquitoes from 11 different species, were captured during 2012-2013, and detection of filarioid DNA was attempted by PCR using specific primers (ITS-2 and COI), followed by DNA sequencing. In a single Culex pipiens specimen D. immitis DNA was detected both in the head-thorax and abdomen sections. Filarioid nematode DNA was also detected in eight additional Cx. pipiens specimens also in both the thorax and the abdomen, but analysis of sequence data did not allow unambiguous assignment of any of the obtained sequences to a previously defined species. All Cx. pipiens with filarioid DNA were individually analysed by CQ11 to discriminate between pipiens, molestus, and hybrid forms. Besides, rDNA ITS-2 sequence analysis revealed the presence of haplotype H1 and H2 of Cx. pipiens. To our knowledge this study revealed, for the first time in Spain, the occurrence of likely mature infection of D. immitis in Cx. pipiens, as well as with other yet uncharacterized nematodes, supporting its role as a potential vector of these filarids.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study screened 881 adult female mosquitoes from 11 species in Southwest Spain during 2012–2013 for filarioid DNA and detected *Dirofilaria immitis* DNA in one *Culex pipiens* f. *pipiens* specimen, plus unclassified Filarioidea DNA in eight additional *Cx. pipiens*. The authors suggest *Cx. pipiens* f. *pipiens* may act as a potential vector of *D. immitis* in Spain and that uncharacterized filarioids, possibly of avian origin, circulate in the region.

Key findings

  • Among 881 adult female mosquitoes, 68.56% were *Cx. pipiens*; one *Cx. pipiens* s.l. specimen had *D. immitis* DNA in both head-thorax and abdomen, giving a *D. immitis* prevalence of 0.16% in *Cx. pipiens* s.l. This specimen was a gravid *Cx. pipiens* f. *pipiens*, haplotype H1, collected in Coria in August 2013.
  • Eight additional *Cx. pipiens* s.l. specimens were positive for filarioid DNA in thorax and/or abdomen, but ITS-2 and COI sequences could not be unambiguously assigned to a known species; COI sequences showed 91–92% identity with Filarioidea sp. (JX870433) and *Loa loa* (HQ186250), suggesting possible avian origin.
  • All filarioid-positive mosquitoes were identified as *Cx. pipiens* s.s. by ACE-2; CQ11 analysis classified the *D. immitis*-positive specimen as *pipiens* form, while the other positives were *molestus*, *pipiens*, or hybrids. ITS-2 analysis found haplotypes H1 and H2, plus a hybrid form.
  • Positive mosquitoes were collected between June and August in 2012 and 2013 in five rural areas of Extremadura; *Cx. pipiens* abundance was monophasic from May to August.

Methods

  • Adult female mosquitoes were collected monthly from January 2012 to December 2013 using CDC miniature light-traps at 21 stations across 18 municipalities in Extremadura, Southwest Spain; 881 females from 11 species were morphologically identified.
  • Females were dissected into head-thorax and abdomen; DNA was extracted and tested by PCR for filarioid ITS-2 and COI, followed by sequencing. *Cx. pipiens* complex members were characterized by ACE-2 PCR, CQ11 PCR for *pipiens*/*molestus*/hybrid forms, and rDNA ITS-2 haplotype analysis.
  • Filarioid COI sequences were analyzed with BLASTn, multiple alignment, and phylogenetic reconstruction using NJ, ML, Bayesian, and NeighborNet methods.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: the limited number of infected specimens means the vector role of *Cx. pipiens* f. *pipiens* requires further confirmation; low-quality ITS-2 sequences precluded more comprehensive analysis, and unambiguous COI data were obtained from only four additional amplicons.
  • Evident from the text: the *D. immitis* finding rests on a single positive mosquito, so vector competence cannot be established without experimental infection or more field evidence.
  • Evident from the text: the unclassified Filarioidea sequences could not be assigned to species, leaving their life cycle, host range, and vector associations unresolved.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.04.030

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Dirofilaria immitis DNA was detected in a single Culex pipiens specimen, in both the head-thorax and abdomen sections.

    “In a single Culex pipiens specimen D. immitis DNA was detected both in the head-thorax and abdomen sections.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 3.1. Identification of mosquitoes and Filarioidea detection · p. 7

    The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Culex pipiens s.l. was 0.16%.

    “Hence, prevalence of D. immitis in Cx. pipiens s.l. was 0.16%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 3.2. Characterizing Filarioid DNA positive Culex pipiens · p. 11

    The Culex pipiens specimen infected with Dirofilaria immitis was identified as Culex pipiens form pipiens based on the CQ11 locus.

    “The mosquito found infected with D. immitis was identified as Cx. pipiens form pipiens based on the analysis of the CQ11 locus”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 3.2. Characterizing Filarioid DNA positive Culex pipiens · p. 11

    The ITS-2 sequence of the Dirofilaria immitis infected specimen was 100% identical to haplotype H1 of Culex pipiens.

    “Sequence analysis comparisons showed that the specimen infected with D. immitis ( LC114271 ) was 100% identical to haplotype H1 of Cx. pipiens”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    This is the first time in Spain that D. immitis DNA has been detected in the head-thorax of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first time in Spain, that D. immitis DNA has been detected in the head-thorax of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Filarioid nematode DNA was detected in eight additional Culex pipiens specimens, in both the thorax and abdomen, but the sequences could not be unambiguously assigned to a previously defined species.

    “Filarioid nematode DNA was also detected in eight additional Cx. pipiens specimens also in both the thorax and the abdomen, but analysis of sequence data did not allow unambiguous assignment of any of the obtained sequences to a previously defined species.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.1. Identification of mosquitoes and Filarioidea detection · p. 6

    The seasonal distribution of Culex pipiens showed a strong influence of climate, with a monophasic distribution from May to August, coincident with an average monthly temperature of 26 °C and low relative humidity of 40%.

    “The data gained during the two consecutive seasons showed a strong influence of climate on the abundance of Cx. pipiens , with a clear monophasic distribution from May to August, which was coincident with the average monthly temperature (26 °C) and low relative humidity (40%), typically observed for this bioclimatic area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    Culex theileri, Aedes caspius, and Anopheles maculipennis s.l. were collected in this study but were not infected with Dirofilaria spp.

    “Cx. theileri , Ae. (Och.) caspius and An. maculipennis s.l have also been collected in this study, albeit not infected with Dirofilaria spp., demanding further studies to ascertain their role in its transmission in this region of Spain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5. Conclusion · p. 14

    Cx. pipiens is an endemic species and highly abundant in the surveyed area.

    “Being Cx. pipiens an endemic species and highly abundant in the surveyed area”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    In this study, haplotype H1 was detected in two mosquitoes infected with filarioid nematodes and identified as Cx. pipiens f. pipiens by CQ11.

    “In this study, the haplotype H1 was detected in two mosquitoes (infected with filarioid nematodes) identified as Cx. pipiens f. pipiens by CQ11.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    The analysis of ITS-2 sequences indicated the presence of haplotype H2 as well as hybrid forms in mosquitoes with filarioid DNA.

    “Moreover, the analysis of ITS-2 sequences also indicated the presence of haplotype H2 as well as hybrid forms in mosquitoes with filarioid DNA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Dirofilaria immitis is present in Spain, with prevalences ranging from 0.8% to 36.7% in dogs along the Iberian Peninsula, and 19%-39% in the Balearic and Canary Islands.

    “D. immitis is present in Spain, with prevalences ranging from 0.8% to 36.7% in dogs along the Iberian Peninsula, and 19%-39% in the Balearic and Canaries islands (reviewed by Diosdado et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diosdado et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.2. DNA extraction and molecular identification · p. 5

    All PCR products were sequenced on both strands.

    “All PCR products were sent to purify and sequence on both strands”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    In neighbouring Portugal, Culex pipiens revealed a higher Dirofilaria immitis infection rate (0.5%).

    “In neighbouring Portugal, Cx. pipiens revealed a higher D. immitis infection rate (0.5%) ( Ferreira et al., 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferreira et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 2.3. Filarioidea DNA sequence analyses · p. 5

    Convergence was monitored with Tracer v1.6, confirming that ESS values of all estimated parameters were above 200.

    “Convergence was monitored with Tracer v1.6, confirming that ESS values of all the estimated parameters confirmed to be above 200.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    The hypothesis that Cx. pipiens f. pipiens may play a role as a competent vector requires further confirmation, especially because of the limited number of infected specimens.

    “This hypothesis requires further confirmation, specially accounting the limited number of infected specimens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.2. DNA extraction and molecular identification · p. 4

    Positive controls (DNA from molestus and pipiens forms) were included in the PCR assays.

    “Positive controls (i.e. DNA from molestus and pipiens forms) were included in the PCR assays.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    After blood meal digestion, larval development to the infective L3 stage in Malpighian tubules and migration to the head-thorax may have occurred in the gravid Cx. pipiens f. pipiens in which D. immitis was detected.

    “holds the possibility that after blood meal digestion, larval development to the infective L3 stage in Malpighian tubules and migration to the head-thorax, may have occurred ( Anderson, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anderson, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Detection of D. immitis DNA in the head-thorax of a gravid Cx. pipiens f. pipiens indicates that larval development and migration to the head-thorax occurred, rather than residual blood-meal DNA.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    Elsewhere, Cx. pipiens s.l. has been found as a competent vector for D. immitis.

    “However, elsewhere, Cx. pipiens s.l. has been found as a competent vector for this parasite ( Capelli et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Capelli et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.2. DNA extraction and molecular identification · p. 4

    Negative controls (no DNA template) were performed for each extraction procedure.

    “Negative controls (no DNA template) were performed for each extraction procedure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Humans are only accidental hosts for Dirofilaria immitis as the parasite cannot develop to the adult stage.

    “Humans are only accidental hosts as the parasite cannot develop to the adult stage (dead-end host)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pampiglione and Rivasi, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    Other mosquito species have been found infected with Dirofilaria throughout Europe, with infection rates ranging from 0.17% to 1.13% for Culex theileri.

    “Other mosquito species, have been found infected throughout Europe, such as Cx. theileri in the Canary islands ( Morchón et al., 2011), Madeira island (Santa-Ana et al., 2006), and mainland Portugal (Ferreira et al., 2015), with infection rates that range from 0.17% to 1.13%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Morchón et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Santa-Ana et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ferreira et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 3

    The incrimination of vectors of Dirofilaria in Spain has so far led to the detection of Dirofilaria immitis DNA in the abdomen of two Culex pipiens (haplotype H1) in Salamanca and in Culex theileri in the Canary Islands, and no mature infections have been found.

    “The incrimination of vectors of Dirofilaria in Spain has led so far to the detection of D. immitis DNA in the abdomen of two Culex pipiens (haplotype H1) in Salamanca (western Spain) and in Cx. theileri in the Canary Islands, and no mature infections have been found, as no DNA was detected in the head-thorax of the analysed specimens ( Morchón et al., 2007 and Morchón et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Morchón et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morchón et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 3

    The pipiens form of Culex pipiens is anautogenous, eurygamous, and preferably ornithophilic, while the molestus form is autogenous, stenogamous, and preferably mamophilic.

    “The socalled pipiens form is characterized as being anautogenous, eurygamous, and preferably ornithophilic, while the molestus form is autogenous, stenogamous and preferably mamophilic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gomes et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.3. Filarioidea DNA sequence analyses · p. 5

    Editing of the COI alignments was done using GUIDANCE, selecting columns with confidence levels above 0.9.

    “Editing of the COI alignments was done using GUIDANCE, selecting columns with confidence levels above 0.9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Canine dirofilariosis is a major veterinary health problem in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions of the world.

    “Canine dirofilariosis is a major veterinary health problem in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions of the world (Simón et al., 2012)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simón et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 3

    In neighbouring Portugal, canine dirofilariosis is endemic with an overall national seroprevalence of 2.1%-15.1%.

    “In neighbouring Portugal, canine dirofilariosis is endemic with an overall national seroprevalence of 2.1%- 15.1% ( Alho et al., 2014 and Vieira et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Alho et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vieira et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 3

    In cats, seroprevalence values of 11.4% and 18.1% were detected in Barcelona and the Canary Islands, respectively.

    “In cats, seroprevalence values of 11.4% and 18.1% were detected in Barcelona and the Canary Islands, respectively ( Montoya-Alonso et al., 2014 and Montoya-Alonso et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Montoya-Alonso et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Montoya-Alonso et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    The detection of Dirofilaria immitis in a single Culex pipiens specimen indicates a low prevalence in this species (0.16%), in line with previous reports from mainland Spain, although with a higher infection rate (0.3%).

    “The detection of D. immitis in a single Cx. pipiens specimen is indicative of the nematode low prevalence in this species (0.16%), in line with previous reports from mainland Spain, although with a higher infection rate (0.3%) ( Morchón et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morchón et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Dirofilariosis is endemic in the Mediterranean region, affecting southern European countries including Portugal, Spain, France and Italy.

    “Dirofilariosis is endemic in the Mediterranean region, affecting southern European countries including Portugal, Spain, France and Italy (Genchi et al., 2005 and Morchón et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Genchi et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morchón et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    At least 70 species of mosquitoes are considered potential vectors of Dirofilaria.

    “with at least 70 species of mosquitoes being considered as potential vectors (Cancrini et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cancrini et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 4. Discussion · p. 11

    Detection of filarioid DNA in mosquitoes revealed nematode infections between June and August, coinciding with temperatures favourable for Culex pipiens abundance and parasite development.

    “Detection of filarioid DNA in these mosquitoes revealed nematode-infections between June and August, coinciding with the time of average temperatures that are favourable for Cx. pipiens higher abundances and parasite development in the vector”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Diverse Filarioidea nematodes may be widely distributed in Europe, in a large range of hosts.

    “reports such as these do suggest that diverse Filarioidea nematodes may be widely distributed in Europe, in a large range of hosts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Boothe et al. (2015) reported detection of filarioid nematodes in 3.8% of blood-fed Cx. pipiens.

    “while Boothe et al. (2015) reported detection of filarioid nematodes in 3.8% of blood-fed Cx. pipiens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boothe et al. (2015) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Haplotype H1 may be genetically ascribed to Cx. pipiens f. pipiens, while haplotype H2 is an intermediate form or hybrid.

    “These studies suggested that haplotype H1 may be genetically ascribed to Cx. pipiens f. pipiens while haplotype H2 as an intermediate form or hybrid.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Previous studies have reported detection of unknown species of filarioid nematodes in mosquitoes collected in Hungary and Germany.

    “Previous studies have already reported the detection of unknown species of filarioid nematodes in mosquitoes collected in Hungary (Kemenesi et al., 2015), Germany (Czajka et al., 2012)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kemenesi et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Czajka et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 12

    Cx. quinquefasciatus is a competent vector for transmission of D. immitis, as shown by experimental infections.

    “both Lai et al. (2000) and Carvalho et al. (2008) have provided compelling evidence for the vector competence of Cx. quinquefasciatus , a member of the same complex, for the transmission of D. immitis by means of experimental infections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lai et al. (2000) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carvalho et al. (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Analysis of nuclear rDNA ITS-2 sequences allows validation of the classification and haplotype characterization of mosquitoes.

    “According to Bargues et al. (2006) and Morchón et al. (2007), the analysis of nuclear rDNA ITS-2 sequences allows validation of the classification and haplotype characterization of mosquitoes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bargues et al. (2006) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morchón et al. (2007) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Conclusion · p. 14

    The possible role of Cx. pipiens as vector could have a clear impact on human and veterinary health that must be taken into consideration to establish control measures for dirofilariosis.

    “its possible role as vector could have a clear impact on human and veterinary health that must be taken into consideration to establish control measures for dirofilariosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Cardiofilaria pavlovskyi has been previously reported in birds in Spain.

    “Curiously, this species has also been previously reported in birds in Spain by López-Caballero (1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites López-Caballero (1982)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 4. Discussion · p. 13

    Genetic analysis of mosquito populations solely based on ITS-2 sequences is not devoid of analytical limitations.

    “Despite its usefulness, genetic analysis of mosquito populations solely based on such a strategy is not devoid of analytical limitations, which could be overcome via combination with microsatellite analyses in future studies ( Gomes et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gomes et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

36 of 36
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no information regarding the distribution and prevalence of filarioid nematodes in mosquito vectors in Extremadura.

    “Despite the high level of risk for dirofilariosis in the Extremadura region of Spain (Simón et al., 2014), there is no information regarding the distribution and prevalence of filarioid nematodes in mosquito vectors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Detection of D. immitis DNA in the head-thorax of a gravid Cx. pipiens f. pipiens indicates that larval development and migration to the head-thorax occurred, rather than residual blood-meal DNA.

    “The fact that D. immitis was detected in a gravid Cx. pipiens f. pipiens , both in head-thorax and in the abdomen, holds the possibility that after blood meal digestion, larval development to the infective L3 stage in Malpighian tubules and migration to the head-thorax, may have occurred”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are consistent with previous studies reporting no clear breed or sex pre-disposition beyond differences attributable to management practices, such as those observed between hunting or working dogs and companion animals.

    “Regarding intrinsic host factors, the results are consistent with previous studies reporting no clear breed or sex pre-disposition beyond differences attributable to management practices, such as those observed between hunting or working dogs and companion animals (4, 5, 10, 12, 26–29).”

    From Deciphering the socio-environmental factors associated with realized heartworm transmission risk in dogs from Portugal and Spain (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction (pp. 2–3) discusses canine heartworm prevalence and mosquito vectors, while the Discussion (p. 11) describes mosquito collection and infection. Our copy does not address predisposition by dog breed or sex, or differences between hunting, working, and companion dogs; searches for those terms and management practices found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aedes albopictus and Cx. pipiens are recognised vectors of heartworm.

    “Among the mosquito species that best adapt to these kinds of changes are Aedes albopictus and Cx. pipiens, which are recognised vectors of heartworm”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Larvae of D. immitis have been found in Cx. pipiens in the Iberian Peninsula and in Cx. theileri in the Canary Islands.

    “Furthermore, larvae of D. immitis in Cx. pipiens in the Iberian Peninsula [14,15] and in Cx. theileri in the Canary Islands [16] have been found.”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

  • In Spain, Cx. pipiens and Cx. theileri have been reported as potential vectors of D. immitis in two endemic regions of the Iberian Peninsula.

    “In Spain, the existence of Cx. pipiens and Cx. theileri as potential vectors was reported in two endemic regions of the Iberian Peninsula [148,149].”
  • D. immitis microfilariae development to the L3 stage has recently been found in the thorax-head of one Cx. pipiens f. pipiens from Spain.

    “However, D. immitis microfilariae development to the L3 stage has recently been found in the thorax-head of one Cx. pipiens f. pipiens from Spain [9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract says all eight additional mosquitoes were positive in both body sections

    Major

    The abstract says filarioid DNA was detected in both the thorax and abdomen of all eight additional mosquitoes. Table 2 lists only one of those eight as positive in both sections; the others are listed as positive in either the head-thorax or the abdomen.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. López-Caballero, 1982, Study on microfilariae, 1: the microfilaria of Cardofilaria pavlovskyi Strom, 1937: (Nematoda: Filarioidea), Rev. Iber. Parasitol., 42, 57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bravo-Barriga, D., Parreira, R., Almeida, A. P. G., Calado, M., Blanco-Ciudad, J., Serrano-Aguilera, F. J., Pérez-Martín, J. E., Sánchez-Peinado, J., Pinto, J., Reina, D., & Frontera, E.
Affiliations
  • Unidade de Microbiologia Médica (PT)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
223
Pages
173-180
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343289130
Cited by
47
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejería de Economía, Comercio e Innovación
  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports of Spain (AP2010-5854)
  • Banco Santander
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Culex pipiens, Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, mosquito-borne transmission, Filarioidea, zoonotic nematodes, Culex pipiens molestus, southwest Spain
MeSH terms
Animals, Culex, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Insect Vectors, Phylogeny, Spain, Genetic Variation, DNA, Helminth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review