Cited by 133Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 5 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Variation in oxytocin is related to variation in affiliative behavior in monogamous, pairbonded tamarins

Open access

Abstract

Oxytocin plays an important role in monogamous pairbonded female voles, but not in polygamous voles. Here we examined a socially-monogamous cooperatively breeding primate where both sexes share in parental care and territory defense for within species variation in behavior and female and male oxytocin levels in 14 pairs of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus), In order to obtain a stable chronic assessment of hormones and behavior, we observed behavior and collected urinary hormonal samples across the tamarins’ three week ovulatory cycle. We found similar levels of urinary oxytocin in both sexes. However, basal urinary oxytocin levels varied ten-fold across pairs and pair-mates displayed similar oxytocin levels. Affiliative behavior (contact, grooming, sex) also varied greatly across the sample and explained more than half the variance in pair oxytocin levels. The variables accounting for variation in oxytocin levels differed by sex. Mutual contact and grooming explained most of the variance in female oxytocin levels whereas sexual behavior explained most of the variance in male oxytocin levels. The initiation of contact by males and solicitation of sex by females were related to increased levels of oxytocin in both. This study demonstrates within-species variation in oxytocin that is directly related to levels of affiliative and sexual behavior. However, different behavioral mechanisms influence oxytocin levels in males and females and a strong pair relationship (as indexed by high levels of oxytocin) may require the activation of appropriate mechanisms for both sexes.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 14 pairs of cotton-top tamarins, urinary oxytocin varied ten-fold across individuals but did not differ by sex, and pair mates had correlated oxytocin levels. Affiliative and sexual behavior explained substantial variance in oxytocin, with different behavioral predictors for females and males.

Key findings

  • No sex difference in mean urinary oxytocin: females 23.69 ± 5.25 vs males 16.26 ± 3.56 pg/mg Cr, t(26)=1.17, P=0.25; within pairs, male and female oxytocin levels were significantly correlated (RS=0.714, N=14, P=0.02).
  • Oxytocin varied ten-fold across individuals: females ranged 4.5 to 46.4 pg/mg Cr and males ranged 3.89 to 39.92 ng/mg Cr, as reported. Pair oxytocin correlated with affiliative behavior (RS=0.783, N=14, P<0.01), and remained significant when sexual behavior was excluded (RS=0.72, N=14, P<0.02).
  • Stepwise regressions: mean pair oxytocin was predicted by total sexual behavior plus affiliative frequency (F(2,11)=9.54, P=0.004, adjusted r²=0.57); female oxytocin by affiliation duration and frequency (F(3,10)=3.937, P=0.04, adjusted r²=0.40); male oxytocin by sexual behavior only (F(1,12)=7.46, P=0.02, adjusted r²=0.33).
  • Individual behaviors explained more pair oxytocin variance: male sexual behavior, male huddle initiation, and female solicitation (F(3,10)=21.54, P=.001, adjusted r²=0.83).

Methods

  • Subjects were 14 male-female cotton-top tamarin pairs housed together for more than one year; one animal per pair was sterilized for colony management but all had intact gonads, and no offspring were present.
  • Behavior was observed in 30-min sessions three times weekly, and first-morning urine samples were collected three times weekly across the female’s three-week ovarian cycle; hormonal and behavioral measures were averaged to assess chronic/basal levels.
  • Urinary oxytocin was measured by enzyme immunoassay, creatinine-corrected, with biological validation via estradiol implants and pairing; analyses used Spearman rank correlations, t-tests, and stepwise multiple regressions.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the data represent chronic/baseline hormone and behavior levels, and that it is unknown whether or how quickly oxytocin levels change in response to sexual behavior or female fertility.
  • Evident from the text: the study is correlational with a small sample of 14 captive pairs, so causal direction between oxytocin and behavior cannot be established; urinary oxytocin is used as a peripheral proxy for biobehavioral oxytocin function.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.014

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

8 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 5 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
15 of 15
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In both marmosets and tamarins, sexual roles are not highly differentiated, with both sexes taking part in infant care, vigilance, and territory defense.

    “In both marmosets and tamarins sexual roles are not highly differentiated, with both taking part in infant care, vigilance and territory defense, which may be related to the lack of sex differences in peripheral oxytocin levels.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: F (1, 12) = 10.69, p = .006

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .006 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .007. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .007

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(1, 12) = 10.69reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .007

    “F (1, 12) = 10.69, p = .006”

  • Consistentt(26) = 1.17reported p = .25 · recomputed p = .253

    “t (26) = 1.17, p = .25”

  • Consistentt(13) = 1.35reported p = .199 · recomputed p = .200

    “t (13) = 1.35, p = .199”

  • ConsistentF(2, 11) = 9.54reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .004

    “F (2, 11) = 9.54, p = .004”

  • ConsistentF(3, 10) = 3.937reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .043

    “F (3, 10) = 3.937, p = .04”

  • ConsistentF(1, 12) = 7.46reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .018

    “F (1, 12) = 7.46, p = .02”

  • ConsistentF(3, 10) = 21.54reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (3, 10) = 21.54, p = .001”

    The paper prints p at a floor (such as p < .001)

  • ConsistentF(2, 11) = 8.53reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “F (2, 11) = 8.53, p = .006”

8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Female regression lists two predictors but reports three predictor degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The description identifies affiliation duration and frequency as the model's predictors and says sex was excluded. Its F(3, 10) statistic instead indicates three predictors, leaving a predictor unaccounted for.

  • Erection-model F statistic does not equal the squared t statistic

    Minor

    For a regression with one predictor, the predictor's t statistic squared must equal the model F statistic. The reported t of 3.31 gives 10.9561, rather than the reported F of 10.69; the gap exceeds rounding to the printed precision.

    Reported 10.69 · recomputed 10.9561

  • Male oxytocin range uses inconsistent units

    Minor

    The male range is given in ng/mg Cr, whereas the assay values and the reported male mean are in pg/mg Cr. The stated units differ by a factor of 1,000.

  • Male sexual behavior does not explain the stated 45% of variance

    Minor

    The discussion says sexual behavior explained 45% of male oxytocin variance. The corresponding results report an adjusted R-squared of 0.33; their F statistic gives an unadjusted R-squared of about 0.38, not 0.45.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Snowdon, 2007, Growing up cooperatively: family processes and infant development in marmosets and tamarins, J. Devel. Proc., 2, 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Metadata

Authors
Snowdon, C. T., Pieper, B. A., Boe, C. Y., Cronin, K. A., Kurian, A. V., & Ziegler, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
Corresponding author
Snowdon, Charles T.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
614-618
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105122295
Cited by
133
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RR000167, P51OD011106)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 035215, R01MH035215)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 000167, P51RR000167)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
oxytocin, affiliative behavior, pair bonding, monogamy, cotton-top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus, grooming, sexual behavior, contact behavior, sex differences, social bonds, ovulatory cycle
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Estradiol, Female, Hydrocortisone, Individuality, Male, Oxytocin, Pair Bond, Saguinus, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review