Cited by 329Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionFree Will and Agency

Are we explaining consciousness yet?

Dennett, D·2001·Cognition

Abstract

Theorists are converging from quite different quarters on a version of the global neuronal workspace model of consciousness, but there are residual confusions to be dissolved. In particular, theorists must resist the temptation to see global accessibility as the cause of consciousness (as if consciousness were some other, further condition); rather, it is consciousness. A useful metaphor for keeping this elusive idea in focus is that consciousness is rather like fame in the brain. It is not a privileged medium of representation, or an added property some states have; it is the very mutual accessibility that gives some informational states the powers that come with a subject's consciousness of that information. Like fame, consciousness is not a momentary condition, or a purely dispositional state, but rather a matter of actual influence over time. Theorists who take on the task of accounting for the aftermath that is critical for consciousness often appear to be leaving out the Subject of consciousness, when in fact they are providing an analysis of the Subject, a necessary component in any serious theory of consciousness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00130-x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C1 evolved as an information-processing architecture that addresses the information-pooling problem.

    “We hypothesize that consciousness in the first sense (C1) evolved as an information-processing architecture that addresses this information-pooling problem ( 20 -23 ).”

    From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennett, D.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Dennett, D
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
79
Issue
1-2
Pages
221-237
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006649625
Cited by
329
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
consciousness, global accessibility, phenomenal consciousness, information accessibility, theory of consciousness
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Humans, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review