Cited by 687Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

Epidemiologic evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes

Everson, Susan A, Maty, Siobhan C, Lynch, John W, Kaplan, George A·2002·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Many of the leading causes of death and disability in the United States and other countries are associated with socioeconomic position. The least well-off suffer a disproportionate share of the burden of disease, including depression, obesity, and diabetes. Research suggests that the adverse effects of economic hardship on both mental and physical health and functioning are evident at young ages and persist across the lifecourse. Moreover, these associations are seen across cultures. Data from four large epidemiologic studies on the role of psychological characteristics, social factors, and behaviors in health and disease risk are presented that highlight the striking associations between socioeconomic factors and chronic diseases. Data from these studies demonstrate that the effects of economic disadvantage are cumulative, with the greatest risk of poor mental and physical health seen among those who experienced sustained hardship over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00303-3

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Everson, S. A., Maty, S. C., Lynch, J. W., & Kaplan, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
891-895
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133031431
Cited by
687
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 37
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd035120-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-113 75, R37AG011375)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-44199, R01HL044199)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD35120)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic status, depression, obesity, diabetes mellitus, economic hardship, socioeconomic position, chronic disease, cumulative disadvantage, life course, mental health, physical health
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Medical Indigency, Obesity, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review