Cited by 109Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Intact performance on an indirect measure of race bias following amygdala damage

Phelps, Elizabeth A, Cannistraci, Christopher J, Cunningham, William A·2003·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Recent brain imaging and lesion studies provide converging evidence for amygdala involvement in judgments of fear and trust based on facial expression [Adolphs et al., Nature 393 (1998) 470; Adolphs et al., Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 1111; Breiter et al., Neuron 17 (1996) 875; Winston et al., Nat. Neurosci. 5 (3) (2002) 277]. Another type of social information apparent in face stimuli is social group membership. Imaging studies have reported amygdala activation to face stimuli of different racial groups [Hart et al., NeuroReport 11 (11) (2000) 2351]. In White American subjects, amygdala activation to Black versus White faces was correlated with indirect, implicit measures of racial evaluation [Phelps et al., J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (5) (2000) 729]. To determine if the amygdala plays a critical role in indirect social group evaluation, as suggested by the imaging results, a patient with bilateral amygdala damage and control subjects were given two measures of race bias. All subjects were female, White Americans. The Modern Racism Scale (MRS) is a direct, self-report measure of race attitudes and beliefs. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is an indirect, automatic evaluation task. Performance on the two tasks did not differ between the patient with amygdala damage and control subjects. All subjects showed a pro-Black bias on the direct, explicit measure of race beliefs, the MRS, and a negative evaluation towards Black faces on the indirect measure of race evaluation, the IAT. These results indicate that even though amygdala activation to Black versus White faces is correlated with performance on indirect measures of race bias [Phelps et al., J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (5) (2000) 729], the amygdala is not critical for normal performance on the IAT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00150-1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single patient with bilateral amygdala damage exhibited an intact IAT effect.

    “Phelps et al (2003) found that a single patient with bilateral amygdala damage exhibited an intact IAT effect”

    From Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias (2012) · cites this paper as Phelps et al (2003)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phelps, E. A., Cannistraci, C. J., & Cunningham, W. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Phelps, Elizabeth A
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
203-208
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056166490
Cited by
109
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Yale University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, racial bias, implicit racial attitudes, Implicit Association Test, facial expressions
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Black or African American, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Prejudice, Social Identification, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review