Cited by 189Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind

Abu-Akel, Ahmad·2003·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

This paper attempts, based on a review of a wide range of clinical, biobehavioral and neuroanatomical studies, to account for the various theory of mind impairments observed in psychiatric and developmental disorders in a single neurobiological model. The proposed model is composed of a representational component subserved by posterior brain regions (temporal and parietal) and an application/execution component subserved by prefrontal regions. Information processed in posterior regions is relayed through a limbic-paralimbic system, which is essential for the implementation of theory of mind processes. In addition to its clinical implications, the proposed model accounts for (1) the ability to mentalize about both the self and others, (2) the nature of the anatomic connections of the various brain regions and their functional correlates, and (3) theories pertaining to the inferencing mechanisms used during mental representation/attribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00190-5

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between the age of 3 and 4, children start to recognize their own beliefs and desires, contributing to development of personal norms and values, and start to understand how these influence their actions.

    “Between the age of 3 and 4, children already start to recognize their own beliefs and desires, which contribute to the development of personal norms and values, and start to understand how these influence their actions [25, 39, 40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abu-Akel, A.
Corresponding author
Abu-Akel, Ahmad
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
29-40
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069701720
Cited by
189
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
theory of mind, mentalization, neurobiological model, prefrontal cortex, attribution, social cognition, mental illness, developmental disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Humans, Limbic System, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Psychophysiology, Self Concept, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review