Cited by 139Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Assessing the effects of bupropion SR on mood dimensions of depression

Tomarken, Andrew J., Dichter, Gabriel S., Freid, Cathryn, Addington, Stephanie, Shelton, Richard C.·2004·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background We assessed the therapeutic effects of bupropion SR and placebo on mood and anxiety symptoms derived from the tripartite model of mood. Based on evidence indicating linkages between dopaminergic activity and the emotional dimension of positive affect/anhedonia, we hypothesized that the dopaminergic effects of bupropion SR would yield particularly pronounced effects on symptoms of anhedonia, relative to anxiety.Methods Nineteen depressed outpatients were randomly assigned to treatment with either bupropion SR 300 mg/day or placebo during a 6-week initial treatment phase. This was followed by a second open-label phase in which patients previously treated with bupropion SR had their dose increased to 400 mg/day, and the placebo group was initiated on bupropion SR 300 mg/day.Results Random regression analyses revealed that during the initial double-blind phase, bupropion SR elicited greater declines than placebo on all measures except those that assessed anxiety. By contrast, the weakest placebo effects were evident on anhedonia. Items assessing the low positive affect pole of the anhedonia dimension were more sensitive to earlier/lower dose bupropion SR treatment, whereas items assessing the high positive affect pole were more sensitive to later/higher dose bupropion SR treatment.Limitations Replication and extension using a larger sample size are mandated.Conclusions This study suggests that the catecholaminergic effects of bupropion SR tended to produce more robust effects on anhedonia/positive affect than placebo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00306-3

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomarken, A. J., Dichter, G. S., Freid, C., Addington, S., & Shelton, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tomarken, Andrew J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
235-241
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165226337
Cited by
139
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-01741, K24MH001741)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
bupropion sustained release, depression, anhedonia, positive affect, anxiety symptoms, dopaminergic effects, placebo effect, dose-response relationship, outpatients
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Affect, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Bupropion, Treatment Outcome, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review