Cited by 92Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Changes in positive and negative affect during pharmacological treatment and cognitive therapy for major depressive disorder: A secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials

Dunn, Barnaby D., German, Ramaris E., Khazanov, Gabi, Xu, Colin, Hollon, Steven D., DeRubeis, Robert J.·2020·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

The cardinal symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are heightened depressed mood (negative affectivity, or NA) and diminished interest or pleasure (positive affectivity, or PA). It is unknown how well treatments for MDD repair either symptom. Two secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials were therefore conducted. In Study 1, 180 adult outpatients with MDD received 16 weeks of antidepressant medication (ADM; n = 120) or cognitive therapy (CT; n = 60). In Study 2, adult outpatients with MDD were treated until remission with ADM ( n = 225) or ADM and CT ( n = 227). Across trials and treatments, intake disturbances were more marked in PA than NA, there was smaller repair of PA than NA during treatment, and disturbances remained more pronounced for PA than NA after treatment. Greater change in PA and NA were independently associated with depression symptom change. These findings suggest that depression treatments more effectively repair NA than PA and that outcomes may be improved with more effective targeting of the latter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702619863427

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, B. D., German, R. E., Khazanov, G., Xu, C., Hollon, S. D., & DeRubeis, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Barnaby D.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
36-51
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2969658555
Cited by
92
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH55877)
  • national institutes of health (MM555875)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
major depressive disorder, positive affect, negative affect, antidepressants, cognitive therapy, treatment response, anhedonia, remission, outpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review