Cited by 208Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMemory and Neural MechanismsDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Mildly impaired water maze performance in maleFmr1 knockout mice

D'Hooge, R., Nagels, G., Franck, F., Bakker, C.E., Reyniers, E., Storm, K., Kooy, R.F., Oostra, B.A. +2 more·1997·Neuroscience

Abstract

Fmr1 knockout mice constitute a putative model of fragile X syndrome, the most common form of heritable mental disability in humans. We have compared the performance of transgenic mice with an Fmr1 knockout with that of normal littermates in hidden- and visible-platform water maze learning, and showed that knockouts exhibit subnormal spatial learning abilities and marginal motor performance deficits. During 12 training trials of the hidden-platform task, escape latency and path length decreased significantly in knockouts and control littermates, and no effect of genotype was found. During four ensuing reversal trials, however, significant differences were found between knockouts and control littermates both in escape latency and path length. During the visible-platform condition, the reversal trials also revealed a difference between knockouts and normal littermates in escape latency, but not in path length. Possibly due to marginal motor incapacity, knockouts swam significantly slower than controls during these latter trials. During both probe trials of the hidden-platform task, knockouts as well as normal littermates spent more time in the target quadrant than in the other quadrants, and percent of time spent in the target quadrant was the same in both groups; swimming velocity was not significantly different between knockouts and normal littermates during these trials. Entries in the target area during the probe trials did show a significant effect of genotype on number of entries. The present results largely confirm and extend our previous findings. Impaired spatial abilities in Fmr1 knockouts might have been due to relatively low response flexibility or high memory interference in Fmr1 knockouts. It remains unclear, however, which brain region or neurochemical system might be involved in these disabilities. We conclude that Fmr1 knockout mice might be a valid model of fragile X mental retardation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00224-2

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The behavioral and cognitive deficits of Fmr1 KO mice are actually quite subtle and parallel Fragile X syndrome patients.

    “By most accounts Fmr1 KO mice appear to have relatively normal behavior, but research has shown that the behavioral and cognitive deficits of the KO are actually quite subtle and parallel FXS patients (Berry-Kravis et al., 2002; D’Hooge et al., 1997; Paradee et al., 1999; Peier et al., 2000).”

    From Oxytocin and vasopressin systems in genetic syndromes and neurodevelopmental disorders (2014) · cites this paper as D’Hooge et al., 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Hooge, R., Nagels, G., Franck, F., Bakker, C. E., Reyniers, E., Storm, K., Kooy, R. F., Oostra, B. A., Willems, P. J., & De Deyn, P. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
367-376
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038361969
Cited by
208
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
Fmr1 knockout mice, fragile X syndrome, spatial learning, water maze, reversal learning, response flexibility, memory interference
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Reversal Learning, Space Perception, Swimming, Mice, Knockout, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review