Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 577

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process

Brockner, Joel, Higgins, E.Tory, Low, Murray B.·2004·Journal of Business Venturing

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00007-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Aldrich, 1994, Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, Acad. Manage. Rev., 19, 645, 10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214 · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214 · Paper page
  2. Brockner, 2002, Regulatory focus theory: its implications for the study of emotions in the workplace, Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 87, 5, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2938 · DOI
  3. Burt, 1997, The contingent value of social capital, Adm. Sci. Q., 42, 339, 10.2307/2393923 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Crowe, 1997, Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making, Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 69, 117, 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Forster, 1998, Approach and avoidance strength as a function of regulatory focus: Revisiting the “goal looms larger” effect, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 75, 1115, 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115 · Paper page
  6. Forster, 2001, Effects of success and failure on motivational strength: Regulatory focus as moderator, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 37, 253, 10.1006/jesp.2000.1455 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gartner, 1985, A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation, Acad. Manage. Rev., 10, 696, 10.5465/amr.1985.4279094 · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279094 · Paper page
  8. Higgins, 1998, Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle, vol. 30, 1
  9. Higgins, 2000, Making a good decision: value from fit, Am. Psychol., 55, 1217, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Higgins, 2000, Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 30, 3
  11. Idson, 2000, Distinguishing gains from non-losses and losses from non-gains: a regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 36, 252, 10.1006/jesp.1999.1402 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lam, T.W, Chiu, C.-Y., in press. The motivational function of regulatory focus in creativity. J. Creat. Behav. · DOI
  13. Liberman, 1999, Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 77, 1135, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135 · Paper page
  14. Low, 2001, The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose, Entrep. Theory Pract., 25, 17, 10.1177/104225870102500402 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Low, 1988, Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges, J. Manage., 14, 139, 10.1177/014920638801400202 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Miller, 1944, Experimental studies of conflict, vol. 1, 431
  17. Shah, 1997, Expectancy X value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 73, 447, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.447 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.447 · Paper page
  18. Thaler, 1980, Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 1, 39, 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Thornton, 1999, The sociology of entrepreneurship, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 25, 19, 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Venkataraman, 1997, The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective, vol. 3, 119

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., & Low, M. B.
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
203-220
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164770078
Cited by
577
References
3
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.