Cited by 1,183Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCellular transport and secretionNeural dynamics and brain function

Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses

Open access
Dobrunz, Lynn E., Stevens, Charles F.·1997·Neuron

Abstract

Previous studies of short-term plasticity in central nervous systems synapses have largely focused on average synaptic properties. In this study, we use recordings from putative single synaptic release sites in hippocampal slices to show that significant heterogeneity exists in facilitation and depletion among synapses. In particular, the amount of paired-pulse facilitation is inversely related to the initial release probability of the synapse. We also examined depletion at individual synapses using high frequency stimulation, and estimated the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool, which averaged 5.0 +/- 3.0 quanta (n = 13 synapses). In addition, these experiments demonstrate that the release probability at a synapse is directly correlated with the size of its readily releasable vesicle pool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80338-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of vesicles adjacent to the presynaptic cleft is proportional to those primed for synaptic transmitter release.

    “The area of the postsynaptic density is proportional to the number of postsynaptic receptors (Nusser et al., 1998), while the number of vesicles adjacent to the presynaptic cleft is proportional to those primed for synaptic transmitter release (Dobrunz and Stevens, 1997).”

    From The influence of phospho-tau on dendritic spines of cortical pyramidal neurons in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (2013) · cites this paper as Dobrunz and Stevens, 1997

    The passage on the physical interpretation of the readily releasable pool (indexed as Abstract; no page given) says that this pool may correspond roughly to morphologically docked vesicles. It explicitly says that identifying the two pools is “far from established” and calls for a demonstration that their sizes vary correspondingly. Thus, it supports a possible relationship, not the claimed proportionality as a settled fact. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]1. Abbott, L.F. ∙ Varela, J.A. ∙ Sen, K. ... Synaptic depression and cortical gain control Science. 1997; 275:220-224 Crossref Scopus (1261) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Allen, C. ∙ Stevens, C.F. An evaluation of causes for unreliability of synaptic transmission Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994; 91:10380-10383 Crossref Scopus (324) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Almers, W. ∙ Tse, F.W. Transmitter release from synapsesdoes a preassembled fusion pore initiate exocytosis? Neuron. 1990; 4:813-818 Full Text (PDF) Scopus (142) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Barrett, E.F. ∙ Stevens, C.F. The kinetics of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction J. Physiol. 1972; 227:691-708 PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Baskys, A. ∙ Malenka, R.C. Trans-ACPD depresses synaptic transmission in the hippocampus Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1991; 193:131-132 Crossref Scopus (75) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Bennett, M. ∙ Model, P. ∙ Highstein, S. Stimulation-induced depletion of vesicles, fatigue of transmission and recovery processes at a vertebrate central synapse Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1976; 40:25-35 Crossref Scopus (22) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Bertolino, M. ∙ Baraldi, M. ∙ Parenti, C. ... Modulation of AMPA/kainate receptors by analogues of diazoxide and cyclothiazide in thin slices of rat hippocampus Recept. Channels. 1993; 1:267-278 PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Borges, S. ∙ Gleason, E. ∙ Turelli, M. ... The kinetics of quantal transmitter release from retinal amacrine cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995; 92:6896-6900 Crossref Scopus (59) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Borst, J.G.G. ∙ Sakmann, B. Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse Nature. 1996; 383:431-434 Crossref Scopus (512) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Choi, S. ∙ Lovinger, D.M. Metabotropic glutamate receptor modulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels involves multiple receptor subtypes in cortical neurons J. Neurosci. 1996; 16:36-45 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Creager, R. ∙ Dunwiddie, T.V. ∙ Lynch, G. Paired-pulse and frequency facilitation in the CA1 region of the in vitro rat hippocampus J. Physiol. 1980; 299:409-424 PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [13]13. del Castillo, J. ∙ Katz, B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential J. Physiol. 1954; 124:560-573 PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [14]14. Eaton, S. ∙ Jane, D. ∙ Jones, P. ... Competitive antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptors by (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine and (RS)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993; 244:195-197 Crossref Scopus (229) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [15]15. Goda, Y. ∙ Stevens, C.F. Two components of transmitter release at a central synapse Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994; 91:12942-12946 Crossref Scopus (443) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [16]16. Hess, G. ∙ Kuhnt, U. ∙ Voronin, L. Quantal analysis of paired-pulse facilitation in guinea pig hippocampal slices Neurosci. Lett. 1987; 77:187-192 Crossref Scopus (121) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [17]17. Hessler, N.A. ∙ Shirke, A.M. ∙ Malinow, R. The probability of transmitter release at a mammalian central synapse Nature. 1993; 366:569-572 Crossref Scopus (483) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [18]18. Huang, Y.-Y. ∙ Nguyen, P.V. ∙ Abel, T. ... Long-lasting forms of synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus Learning Mem. 1996; 3:74-85 Crossref Scopus (198) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [19]19. Larkman, A. ∙ Stratford, K. ∙ Jack, J. Quantal analysis of excitatory synaptic action and depression in hippocampal slices [see comments] Nature. 1991; 350:344-347 Crossref Scopus (135) PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [20]20. Magleby, K.L. (1987). Short-term changes in synaptic efficacy. In Synaptic Function, G.M. Edelman, V.E. Gall, and K.M. Cowan, eds. (New York: John Wiley and Sons), pp. 21–56. Google Scholar
  20. [21]21. Malenka, R.C. Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampusLTP and LTD Cell. 1994; 78:535-538 Full Text (PDF) Scopus (563) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [22]22. Malinow, R. ∙ Otmakhov, N. ∙ Blum, K.I. ... Visualizing hippocampal synaptic function by optical detection of Ca2+ entry through the N-methyl-D-aspartate channel Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994; 91:8170-8174 Crossref Scopus (80) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [23]23. Mallart, A. ∙ Martin, A.R. The relation between quantal content and facilitation at the neuromuscular junction of frog J. Physiol. 1968; 196:593-604 PubMed Google Scholar
  23. [24]24. Manabe, T. ∙ Wyllie, D.J. ∙ Perkel, D.J. ... Modulation of synaptic transmission and long-term potentiationeffects on paired pulse facilitation and EPSC variance in the CA1 region of the hippocampus J. Neurophysiol. 1993; 70:1451-1459 PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [25]25. Markram, H. ∙ Tsodyks, M. Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons Nature. 1996; 382:807-810 Crossref Scopus (644) PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [26]26. Murphy, T. ∙ Baraban, J. ∙ Wier, W. Mapping miniature synaptic currents to single synapses using calcium imaging reveals heterogeneity in postsynaptic output Neuron. 1995; 15:159-168

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobrunz, L. E., & Stevens, C. F.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Stevens, Charles F.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
995-1008
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019016101
Cited by
1,183
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 57
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
paired-pulse facilitation, short-term plasticity, hippocampus, central synapses, synaptic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Stem, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Hippocampus, Neural Inhibition, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Synaptic Vesicles, Time Factors, Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review