Cited by 486Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentTreatment of Major Depression

Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. II: cohort effects

Kessler, Ronald C., McGonagle, Katherine A., Nelson, Christopher B., Hughes, Michael, Swartz, Marvin, Blazer, Dan G.·1994·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Data from a nationally representative sample of the general population are used to study cohort differences in the prevalence of DSM-III-R Major Depressive Episode (MDE). We document increasing lifetime prevalence of MDE among both men and women in more recent cohorts, but no major change in the sex ratio over the 40-year period retrospectively covered in the survey. We find a cohort difference in 12-month MDE, with older women much more likely than older men to have recurrent episodes. This sex difference in recurrence plays an important part in the elevated 12-month prevalence of depression among women compared to men in the 45-54 age range.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-0327(94)90147-3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stress-related disorders such as depression and anxiety are more common in women than in men.

    “Although this may reduce the generalizability of our results, it is important to note that stressrelated disorders such as depression and anxiety are more common in women than in men (Bandelow and Michaelis, 2015;Kessler et al., 1994).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Swartz, M., & Blazer, D. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
15-26
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039045651
Cited by
486
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
17.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 K01 MH00507, R01MH046376, 5 R01 MH46376)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, cohort effects, sex differences, major depressive episode, lifetime prevalence, 12-month prevalence, recurrence, depression in women, age differences, National Comorbidity Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review