Cited by 148Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaMental Health Treatment and Access

Child-, adolescent- and young adult-onset depressions: differential risk factors in development?

Open access
Shanahan, L., Copeland, W. E., Costello, E. J., Angold, A.·2011·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Previous research reported that childhood adversity predicts juvenile- onset but not adult-onset depression, but studies confounded potentially genuine differences in adversity with differences in the recency with which adversity was experienced. The current study paper took into account the recency of risk when testing for differences among child-, adolescent- and young adult-onset depressions. Method: Up to nine waves of data were used per subject from two cohorts of the Great Smoky Mountains Study (GSMS;n=1004), covering children in the community aged 9–16, 19 and 21 years. Youth and one of their parents were interviewed using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA) between ages 9 and 16; these same youth were interviewed using the Young Adult Psychiatric Assessment (YAPA) at ages 19 and 21. The most common psychosocial risk factors for depression were assessed: poverty, life events, parental psychopathology, maltreatment, and family dysfunction. Results: Consistent with previous research, most childhood psychosocial risk factors were more strongly associated with child-onset than with adolescent-/adult-onset depression. When potentially genuine risk differences among the depression-onset groups were disentangled from differences due to the recency of risk, child- and young adult-onset depression were no longer different from one another. Adolescent-onset depression was associated with few psychosocial risk factors. Conclusions: There were no differences in putative risk factors between child- and young adult-onset depression when the recency of risk was taken into account. Adolescent-onset depression was associated with few psychosocial risk factors. It is possible that some adolescent-onset depression cases differ in terms of risk from child- and young adult-onset depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291711000675

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recency hypothesis holds that adverse exposures have time-limited depressogenic effects, meaning proximal exposures are predicted to have stronger associations with depression compared with distal exposures.

    “Another potential mechanism is the ‘recency hypothesis’,34 in which adverse exposures have time-limited depressogenic effects, meaning proximal exposures are predicted to have stronger associations with depression compared with distal exposures.”
  • The results of the second example supported the recency hypothesis, in which proximal rather than distal exposure to stressful life events was more strongly associated with depression.

    “The results of our second example supported the recency hypothesis34 in which proximal, rather than distal, exposure to stressful life events was more strongly associated with depression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shanahan, L., Copeland, W. E., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shanahan, L.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2011-05-06
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
2265-2274
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2140131971
Cited by
148
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-63671, MH11301, R01MH063970, R01MH048085, MH-63970, K23MH080230, R01MH063671)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011301)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression onset, adolescent-onset depression, psychosocial risk factors, childhood adversity, poverty, life events, parental psychopathology, maltreatment, family dysfunction, Great Smoky Mountains Study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Human Development, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, North Carolina, Poverty, Psychosocial Deprivation, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Child of Impaired Parents, Age of Onset, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review