Cited by 56Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Over 2300 Phosphorylated Peptide Identifications with Single-Shot Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in a 100 min Separation

Open access
Ludwig, Katelyn R., Sun, Liangliang, Zhu, Guijie, Dovichi, Norman J., Hummon, Amanda B.·2015·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-electrospray ionization (ESI)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is typically employed for phosphoproteome analysis. Alternatively, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)-ESI-MS/MS has great potential for phosphoproteome analysis due to the significantly different migration times of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of peptides. In this work, we systematically compared UPLC-MS/MS and CZE-MS/MS for phosphorylated peptide identifications (IDs) using an enriched phosphoproteome from the MCF-10A cell line. When the sample loading amount of UPLC was 10 times higher than that of CZE (2 μg vs 200 ng), UPLC generated more phosphorylated peptide IDs than CZE (3313 vs 1783). However, when the same sample loading amounts were used for CZE and UPLC (2-200 ng), CZE-MS/MS consistently and significantly outperformed UPLC-MS/MS in terms of phosphorylated peptide and total peptide IDs. This superior performance is most likely due to the higher peptide intensity generated by CZE-MS/MS. More importantly, compared with UPLC data from a 2 μg sample, CZE-MS/MS can identify over 500 unique phosphorylated peptides from a 200 ng sample, suggesting that CZE and UPLC are complementary for phosphorylated peptide IDs. With further improved loading capacity via a dynamic pH junction method, 2313 phosphorylated peptides were identified with single-shot CZE-MS/MS in a 100 min analysis. This number of phosphorylated peptide IDs is over 1 order of magnitude higher than the number of phosphorylated peptide IDs previously reported by single-shot CZE-MS/MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02457

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ludwig and co-workers reported a CZE-MS approach that identified over 2,300 phosphorylated peptides in a single analysis, illustrating advantages of CZE over LC for PTM analysis.

    “Ludwig and co-workers reported a CZE-MS approach that was able to identify over 2,300 phosphorylated peptides in a single analysis85, thus illustrating the advantages of CZE separation over LC for PTM analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludwig, K. R., Sun, L., Zhu, G., Dovichi, N. J., & Hummon, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
Corresponding author
Hummon, Amanda B.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2015-09-25
Volume
87
Issue
19
Pages
9532-9537
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2298101292
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1351595)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM096767, R01GM110406)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
capillary zone electrophoresis, phosphoproteomics, sample loading capacity, dynamic pH junction, MCF10A cells
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Peptides, Phosphorylation, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Cell Line, Tumor, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review