Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints

Rogers, David, Hahn, Mathew·2010·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
DOI 10.1021/ci100050t
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Extended-connectivity fingerprints (ECFPs) are a novel class of topological fingerprints for molecular characterization. Historically, topological fingerprints were developed for substructure and similarity searching. ECFPs were developed specifically for structure-activity modeling. ECFPs are circular fingerprints with a number of useful qualities: they can be very rapidly calculated; they are not predefined and can represent an essentially infinite number of different molecular features (including stereochemical information); their features represent the presence of particular substructures, allowing easier interpretation of analysis results; and the ECFP algorithm can be tailored to generate different types of circular fingerprints, optimized for different uses. While the use of ECFPs has been widely adopted and validated, a description of their implementation has not previously been presented in the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci100050t

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. Christie B. D., 1993, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33, 545, 10.1021/ci00014a004 · doi:10.1021/ci00014a004
  2. Johnson M., 1990, Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity
  3. McGregor M. J., 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37, 443, 10.1021/ci960151e · DOI
  4. Breiman L., 1984, Classification and Regression Trees
  5. Xia X., 2004, J. Med. Chem., 47, 4463, 10.1021/jm0303195 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hassan M., 2006, Mol. Diversity, 10, 283, 10.1007/s11030-006-9041-5 · DOI
  7. Glick M., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 193, 10.1021/ci050374h · DOI
  8. Morgan H. L., 1965, J. Chem. Doc., 5, 107, 10.1021/c160017a018 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Weininger D., 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29, 97, 10.1021/ci00062a008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Clark R. D., 1989, J. Comput. Chem., 10, 982, 10.1002/jcc.540100804 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ghose A. K., 1998, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 3762, 10.1021/jp980230o · DOI · Paper page
  12. Greene J., 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34, 1297, 10.1021/ci00022a012 · doi:10.1021/ci00022a012
  13. Dubios J. E., 1973, J. Chem. Doc., 13, 8, 10.1021/c160048a004 · doi:10.1021/c160048a004
  14. Attias R., 1983, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 23, 102, 10.1021/ci00039a003 · doi:10.1021/ci00039a003
  15. Durant J., 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 42, 1273, 10.1021/ci010132r · DOI · Paper page
  16. Xing L., 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 42, 796, 10.1021/ci010315d · DOI
  17. Bender A., 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 170, 10.1021/ci034207y · DOI
  18. Glen R. C., 2006, IDrugs, 9, 199
  19. Li Q., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 1776, 10.1021/ci700107y · DOI
  20. Faulon J. L., 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34, 1204, 10.1021/ci00021a031 · DOI
  21. Visco D. P., 2002, J. Mol. Graphics Modell., 20, 429, 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00144-9 · DOI
  22. Faulon J. L., 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 707, 10.1021/ci020345w · DOI
  23. Faulon J. L., 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 721, 10.1021/ci020346o · DOI
  24. Lowis, D. R.HQSAR. A New, Highly Predictive QSAR Technique;Tripos Technical Notes, Tripos:St. Louis, MO, 1998; Vol. 1, no. 5, p3.
  25. Sheridan R. P., 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29, 255, 10.1021/ci00064a005 · doi:10.1021/ci00064a005
  26. Sprague P. W., 1995, Perspect. Drug Discovery Des., 3, 1, 10.1007/BF02174464 · DOI
  27. Norinder U., 1995, QSAR and Molecular Modeling: Concepts, Computational Tools and Biological Applications, 433
  28. Weinstein J. N., 1992, Science, 258, 447, 10.1126/science.1411538 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Briem H., 1996, J. Med. Chem., 39, 3401, 10.1021/jm950800y · DOI
  30. Briem H., 2000, Perspect. Drug Discovery Des., 20, 231, 10.1023/A:1008793325522 · DOI
  31. Rhodes N., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 615, 10.1021/ci0503863 · DOI
  32. Zhang Q., 2006, J. Med. Chem., 49, 1536, 10.1021/jm050468i · DOI
  33. Nettles J. H., 2006, J. Med. Chem., 49, 6802, 10.1021/jm060902w · DOI
  34. Sheridan R., 2007, Expert Opin. Drug Discovery, 2, 423, 10.1517/17460441.2.4.423 · DOI
  35. Rogers D., 2005, J. Biomol. Screening, 10, 682, 10.1177/1087057105281365 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hert J., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 462, 10.1021/ci050348j · DOI
  37. Carhart R. E., 1985, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 25, 64, 10.1021/ci00046a002 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Freedman D., 1991, Statistics
  39. Herman, W.InPartial Least Squares;Kotz, S.; Johnson, N. L., Eds.Wiley:New York, NY, 1985; pp581−591.
  40. Rumelhart D. E., 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations, 10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Yoon S., 2005, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 19, 483, 10.1007/s10822-005-9002-6 · DOI
  42. Steindl T. M., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2146, 10.1021/ci6002043 · DOI
  43. Yang H., 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 35079, 10.1074/jbc.M303098200 · DOI
  44. Klon A. E., 2009, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening, 12, 469, 10.2174/138620709788489046 · doi:10.2174/138620709788489046
  45. Hert J., 2005, J. Med. Chem., 48, 7049, 10.1021/jm050316n · DOI
  46. Cloutier L. M., 2008, Drug Discovery Today, 13, 536, 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.03.022 · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.03.022
  47. Metz J. T., 2007, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 21, 139, 10.1007/s10822-007-9109-z · DOI
  48. Glick M., 2003, Mol. Phys., 101, 1325, 10.1080/0026897031000099862 · DOI
  49. Glick M., 2004, J. Biomol. Screening, 9, 32, 10.1177/1087057103260590 · DOI
  50. Chen B., 2007, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 21, 51, 10.1007/s10822-006-9096-5 · DOI
  51. Hert J., 2004, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2, 3256, 10.1039/b409865j · DOI · Paper page
  52. Costache A. D., 2007, Xenobiotica, 37, 221, 10.1080/00498250601089162 · DOI
  53. Good A. C., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 110, 10.1021/ci6003493 · DOI
  54. Sun H., 2005, J. Med. Chem., 48, 4031, 10.1021/jm050180t · DOI
  55. Flahive E., 2007, QSAR Comb. Sci., 26, 679, 10.1002/qsar.200610124 · doi:10.1002/qsar.200610124
  56. Nidhi; Glick M., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1124, 10.1021/ci060003g · DOI · Paper page
  57. Gedeck P., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1924, 10.1021/ci050413p · DOI
  58. Zhou D., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 981, 10.1021/ci800024c · DOI
  59. Klon A. E., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1945, 10.1021/ci0601315 · DOI
  60. O’Brien S. E., 2005, J. Med. Chem., 48, 1287, 10.1021/jm049254b · DOI
  61. Sun H., 2006, ChemMedChem, 1, 315, 10.1002/cmdc.200500047 · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200500047
  62. Sciabola S., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 76, 10.1021/ci060143q · DOI
  63. Zhou D., 2007, Lett. Drug Des. Discovery, 4, 192, 10.2174/157018007780077462 · doi:10.2174/157018007780077462
  64. Jensen B. F., 2007, J. Med. Chem., 50, 501, 10.1021/jm060333s · DOI
  65. McIntyre T. A., 2009, Xenobiotica, 39, 1, 10.1080/00498250902926906 · DOI
  66. Pelletier D. J., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 1196, 10.1021/ci6004542 · doi:10.1021/ci6004542
  67. Scheiber J., 2009, J. Med. Chem., 52, 3103, 10.1021/jm801546k · DOI
  68. Lee P. H., 2007, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 21, 665, 10.1007/s10822-007-9124-0 · DOI
  69. Kellenberger E., 2007, J. Med. Chem., 50, 1294, 10.1021/jm061389p · DOI
  70. Bender A., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 108, 10.1021/ci800249s · DOI · Paper page
  71. Bender A., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2445, 10.1021/ci600197y · DOI · Paper page
  72. Martin Y., 2009, QSAR Comb. Sci., 28, 797, 10.1002/qsar.200810176 · DOI
  73. Selzer P., 2005, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 9, 310, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.04.001 · DOI
  74. Krier M., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 512, 10.1021/ci050352v · DOI
  75. Steindl T. M., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 563, 10.1021/ci600321m · doi:10.1021/ci600321m
  76. Schuffenhauer A., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 525, 10.1021/ci0503558 · DOI
  77. Schuffenhauer A., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 325, 10.1021/ci6004004 · DOI
  78. Marcou G., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 195, 10.1021/ci600342e · DOI · Paper page
  79. Klon A. E., 2004, J. Med. Chem., 47, 2743, 10.1021/jm030363k · DOI
  80. Klon A. E., 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 2216, 10.1021/ci0497861 · doi:10.1021/ci0497861
  81. Klon A. E., 2004, J. Med. Chem., 47, 4356, 10.1021/jm049970d · doi:10.1021/jm049970d
  82. de Graaf C., 2008, J. Med. Chem., 51, 4978, 10.1021/jm800710x · DOI
  83. Whittle M., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2206, 10.1021/ci0496144 · DOI
  84. Nigsch F., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 2313, 10.1021/ci800079x · DOI
  85. Hert J., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 755, 10.1021/ci8000259 · DOI
  86. Nisius B., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 1347, 10.1021/ci900087y · DOI
  87. van Hoorn W. P., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 2211, 10.1021/ci900072g · DOI
  88. Prathipati P., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 2362, 10.1021/ci800143n · DOI
  89. Papadatos G., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 195, 10.1021/ci800302g · DOI
  90. Muchmore S. W., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 941, 10.1021/ci7004498 · DOI
  91. Liu R., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 542, 10.1021/ci700372s · DOI
  92. Wale N., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 730, 10.1021/ci700369e · DOI
  93. Sullivan D. C., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 817, 10.1021/ci700439z · DOI
  94. Wale N., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 2190, 10.1021/ci9000376 · DOI
  95. Lounkine E., 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 561, 10.1021/ci800377n · doi:10.1021/ci800377n
  96. Baldi P., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 2098, 10.1021/ci700200n · DOI
  97. Hattori K., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 135, 10.1021/ci7002686 · doi:10.1021/ci7002686

Cited by

Items 101–138 of 138

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, D., & Hahn, M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2010-04-28
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
742-754
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
DOI
10.1021/ci100050t
OpenAlex
W1988037271
Cited by
7,524
References
2
FWCI
87.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.