Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 207 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discovery, Synthesis, and Structure–Activity Relationships of Conotoxins

Open access
Akondi, Kalyana B., Muttenthaler, Markus, Dutertre, Sébastien, Kaas, Quentin, Craik, David J., Lewis, Richard J., Alewood, Paul F.·2014·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Peptide therapeutics are acclaimed as a promising addition to the pharmaceutical arena, and they continue to attract interest due to their high potency, bioavailability, and fewer concerns with toxicity, drug to drug cross-reactions, and tissue accumulation. Around 700 species of marine snails of the genus Conus are distributed throughout tropical and subtropical waters. As different species preferentially hunt fish, worms, or molluscs they are categorized as piscivorous, vermivorous, or molluscivorous, respectively, although some cone snail species can feed on more than one prey type. These slow-moving creatures evolved into predators through incorporation of a specialized envenomation apparatus that enables them to quickly subdue their fast-moving prey. Conotoxins target a wide range of receptors and ion channels with unparalleled potency and selectivity. They have consequently become the subject of intense research in light of their immense diagnostic and therapeutic potential and are the focus of this review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr400401e

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Akondi, K. B., Muttenthaler, M., Dutertre, S., Kaas, Q., Craik, D. J., Lewis, R. J., & Alewood, P. F.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
114
Issue
11
Pages
5815-5847
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2052956415
Cited by
323
References
207
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.