Cited by 238Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Associations between longitudinal serum perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) levels and measures of thyroid hormone, kidney function, and body mass index in the Fernald Community Cohort

Open access
Blake, Bevin E., Pinney, Susan M., Hines, Erin P., Fenton, Suzanne E., Ferguson, Kelly K.·2018·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse class of manufactured compounds used in a wide range of industrial processes and consumer products and have been detected in human serum worldwide. Previous cross-sectional and cohort studies in humans have suggested exposure to PFAS is associated with a wide array of chronic diseases, including endocrine disruption, developmental health effects, cancer and metabolic changes. We examined the associations between a panel of eight PFAS and indicators of thyroid disruption, kidney function, and body mass index (BMI), all of which were measured at repeated time points (1990-2008) over the course of the study. Participants (N = 210) were selected from the Fernald Community Cohort based on household water supply from a PFAS-contaminated aquifer. In adjusted repeated measures models, we observed several notable associations between serum PFAS and thyroid hormones as well as kidney function as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). An interquartile (IQR) increase in serum PFOS was associated with a 9.75% (95% CI = 1.72, 18.4) increase in thyroid stimulating hormone. An IQR increase in serum PFNA, PFHxS, and PFDeA was associated with a -1.61% (95% CI = -3.53, -0.59), -2.06% (95% CI = -3.53, -0.59), and -2.20% (95% CI = -4.25, -0.14) change in eGFR, respectively. On the other hand, an IQR increase in serum Me-PFOSA was associated with a 1.53% (95% CI = 0.34, 2.73) increase in eGFR. No significant associations with BMI and serum PFAS were noted. Our findings are in agreement with previous reports that serum PFAS are associated with altered kidney and thyroid function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.042

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS are linked to liver and kidney toxicity in humans and animals.

    “A number of well-studied PFAS, namely perfluorooctanoic sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), are linked to liver and kidney toxicity in humans and animals.6”

    From Evaluation of sorbents and matrix effects for treating heavy metals and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as co-contaminants in stormwater (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) links PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS to reduced kidney function in a human adolescent population and reports a kidney-function association for PFNA and PFHxS in this cohort. It also describes PFOS-induced kidney injury in rats. It does not establish liver toxicity for these three compounds, or kidney toxicity in animals for PFNA and PFHxS. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blake, B. E., Pinney, S. M., Hines, E. P., Fenton, S. E., & Ferguson, K. K.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Kelly K.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
242
Issue
Pt A
Pages
894-904
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883275412
Cited by
236
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (EPA-RD - 83478801, ES007126, NIEHS 1Z01ES102785)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFAS exposure, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid function, renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, endocrine disruption, domestic water supply
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Thyroid Hormones, Thyrotropin, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review