CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,333Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage and Object Detection TechniquesAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SUSAN—A New Approach to Low Level Image Processing

Smith, Stephen M., Brady, J. Michael·1997·International Journal of Computer Vision
DOI 10.1023/a:1007963824710
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007963824710

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial smoothing with the FSL SUSAN algorithm preserves an image's underlying structure by averaging the central voxel with local voxels that have similar intensities.

    “This preserves an image’s underlying structure (tissue types) by averaging the central voxel with local voxels, which have similar intensities (Smith and Brady, 1997).”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Smith and Brady, 1997

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Akarun, L. and Haddad, R. 1992. Adaptive decimated median filtering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 13: 57-62. · DOI
  2. Arce, G. R. and Fontana, S. A. 1988. On the midrange estimator. IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ASSP-36: 920-922. · DOI
  3. Beaudet, P. R. 1978. Rotational invariant image operators. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 579-583.
  4. Bedner, J. B. and Watt, T. L. 1984. Alpha-trimmed means and their relationships to median filters. IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ASSP-32: 145-153. · DOI
  5. Blake, A. and Zisserman, A. 1987. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press: Cambridge, USA. · DOI
  6. Brownrigg, D. R. K. 1984. The weighted median filter. Commun. ACM, 27: 807-818. · DOI
  7. Canny, J. F. 1983. Finding Edges and Lines in Images. Master's thesis, MIT, Cambridge, USA.
  8. Canny, J. F. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(6): 679- 698. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Charnley, D. and Blissett, R. J. 1989. Surface reconstruction from outdoor image sequences. Image and Vision Computing, 7(1): 10-16. · DOI
  10. Chin, R. T. and Yeh, C.-L. 1983. Quantitative evaluation of some edge-preserving noise-smoothing filters. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 23: 67-91. · DOI
  11. Davis, L. S. and Rosenfeld, A. 1978. Noise cleaning by iterated local averaging. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-8(9): 705-710. · DOI
  12. Deriche, R. 1987. Using Canny's criteria to derive a recursively implemented optimal edge detector. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 1(2): 167-187. · DOI
  13. Deriche, R. and Giraudon, G. 1990. Accurate corner detection: An analytical study. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 66-70. · DOI
  14. Dreschler, L. and Nagel, H.-H. 1981. Volumetric model and 3D trajectory of a moving car derived from monocular TV-frame sequence of a street scene. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 20(3): 199-228. · DOI
  15. Ehrich, R. 1978. A symmetric hysteresis smoothing algorithm that preserves principal features. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 8: 121-126. · DOI
  16. Förstner, W. and Gülch, E. 1987. A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centres of circular features. In ISPRS Intercommission Workshop, Interlaken, pp. 149-155.
  17. Geiger, D. and Girosi, F. 1990. Parallel and deterministic algorithms from MRFs: Surface reconstruction and integration. In Proc. 1st European Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 89-98. · DOI
  18. Haralick, R. M. 1984. Digital step edges from zero crossing of second directional derivatives. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(1): 58-68. · DOI
  19. Haralick, R. M. and Shapiro, L. G. 1992. Computer and Robot Vision. Addison-Wesley, Vol. 1. · DOI
  20. Harris, C. G. and Pike, J. M. 1988a. 3D positional integration from image sequences. Image and Vision Computing, 6(2): 87- 90. · DOI
  21. Harwood, D., Subbarao, M., Hakalahti, H., and Davis, L. S. 1987. A new class of edge-preserving smoothing filters. Pattern Recognition Letters, 6: 155-162. · DOI
  22. Hueckel, M. H. 1971. An operator which locates edges in digitized pictures. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 18(1): 113-125. · DOI
  23. Kitchen, L. and Rosenfeld, A. 1982. Gray-level corner detection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1: 95-102. · DOI
  24. Lee, J.-S. 1983. Digital image smoothing and the sigma filter. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 24: 255-269. · DOI
  25. Lev, A., Zucker, S. W., and Rosenfeld, A. 1977. Iterative enhancement of noisy images. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 7: 435-442. · DOI
  26. Liu, S.-T. and Tsai, W.-H. 1990. Moment-preserving corner detection. Pattern Recognition, 23: 441-460. · DOI
  27. Marr, D. and Hildreth, E. C. 1980. Theory of edge detection. Proc. Roy. Soc. London., Vol. B-207, pp. 187-217.
  28. McDonnell, M. J. 1981. Box-filtering techniques. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 17: 65-70. · DOI
  29. Medioni, G. and Yasumoto, Y. 1987. Corner detection and curve representation using cubic b-splines. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 39: 267-278. · DOI
  30. Mehrotra, R., Nichani, S., and Ranganathan, N. 1990. Corner detection. Pattern Recognition, 23: 1223-1233. · DOI
  31. Moravec, H. P. 1977. Towards automatic visual obstacle avoidance. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p. 584.
  32. Moravec, H. P. 1979. Visual mapping by a robot rover. In Proc. of the 6th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 598-600.
  33. Nagao, M. and Matsuyama, T. 1979. Edge preserving smoothing. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 9: 394- 407. · DOI
  34. Nagel, H.-H. 1987. Principles of (low level) computer vision. In Fundamentals in Computer Understanding: Speech and Vision, J. P. Haton (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 113- 139.
  35. Noble, J. A. 1989. Descriptions of Image Surfaces. D. Phil. Thesis, Robotics Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.
  36. Nordström, N. 1990. Biased anisotropic diffusion-A unified regularization and diffusion approach to edge detection. In Proc. 1st European Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 18- 27. · DOI
  37. Paler, K., Föglein, J., Illingworth, J., and Kittler, J. 1984. Local ordered grey levels as an aid to corner detection. Pattern Recognition, 17(5): 535-543. · DOI
  38. Perona, P. and Malik, J. 1987. Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. In IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision, pp. 16-22.
  39. Pratt, W. K. 1972. Generalized Wiener filtering computation techniques. IEEE Trans. Computers, C-21: 636-692. · DOI
  40. Prewitt, J. M. S. 1970. Object enhancement and extraction. Picture Processing and Psychopictorics, in B. S. Lipkin and A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Academic Press.
  41. Roberts, L. G. 1965. Machine perception of three dimensional solids. In Optical and Electro-optical Information Processing, J. T. Tippet (Ed.), MIT Press, pp. 159-197.
  42. Rohr, K. 1992. Modelling and identification of characteristic intensity variations. Image and Vision Computing, 10(2): 66- 76. · DOI
  43. Saint-Marc, P., Chen, J. S., and Medioni, G. 1989. Adaptive smoothing: A general tool for early vision. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 618-624. · DOI
  44. Scollar, I., Weidner, B., and Huang, T. S. 1984. Image enhancement using the median and the interquartile distance. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 25: 236- 251. · DOI
  45. Shen, Q. 1990. Fuzzy image smoothing. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 74-78. · DOI
  46. Shen, J. and Castan, S. 1992. An optimal linear operator for step edge detection. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 54(2): 112-133.
  47. Sinha, S. G. and Schunk, B. G. 1992. A two-stage algorithm for discontinuity-preserving surface reconstruction. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(1): 36- 55. · DOI
  48. Smith, S. M. 1990a. A brief quantitative assessment of a passive 3D measurement system. RARDE Memorandum 31/90, DRA Chertsey, Chobham Lane, Chertsey, Surrey, UK.
  49. Smith, S. M. 1990b. Extracting information from images. First year D. Phil. Report, Robotics Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.
  50. Smith, S. M. 1992. Feature Based Image Sequence Understanding. D. Phil. thesis, Robotics Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.
  51. Smith, S. M. and Brady, J. M. 1994. A scene segmenter; visual tracking of moving vehicles. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 7(2): 191-204. · DOI
  52. Sobel, I. 1990. An isotropic 3 x 3 image gradient operator. Machine Vision for Three-Dimensional Scenes, H. Freeman (Ed.), Academic Press, pp. 376-379.
  53. Tukey, J. W. 1971. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley: Menlo Park, CA.
  54. Venkatesh, S. 1990. A Study of Energy Based Models for the Detection and Classification of Image Features. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Western Australia, Department of Computer Science.
  55. Venkatesh, S. and Owens, R. 1989. An energy feature detection scheme. In Proceedings, IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, Singapore, pp. 553-557.
  56. Venkatesh, S. and Kitchen, L. J. 1992. Edge evaluation using necessary components. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 54(1): 23-30.
  57. Wang, D. C. C., Vagnucci, A. H., and Li, C. C. 1981. Gradient inverse weighted smoothing scheme and the evaluation of its performance. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 15: 167- 181. · DOI
  58. Wang, H. and Brady, M. 1992. Corner detection with subpixel accuracy. Technical Report OUEL 1925/92, University of Oxford.
  59. Witkin, A. P. 1983. Scale-space filtering. In Proc. IJCAI 1983, pp. 1019-1021. · DOI
  60. Zuniga, O. A. and Haralick, R. M. 1983. Corner detection using the facet model. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 30-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, S. M., & Brady, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
ORCID
Smith, Stephen M.
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1997-05
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
45-78
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
DOI
10.1023/a:1007963824710
OpenAlex
W2099046646
Cited by
3,333
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 174 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 190 · 2013: 147 · 2012: 164
FWCI
34.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
Susan, low-level image processing, edge detection, corner detection, feature detection, nonlinear filtering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review