Cited by 38Solar and Space Plasma DynamicsPlanetary Science and ExplorationIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Energetic Particle Radiation Environment Observed by RAD on the Surface of Mars During the September 2017 Event

Open access
Ehresmann, B., Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Guo, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Matthiä, D., Lohf, H., Burmeister, S. +3 more·2018·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The 10–12 September Solar Energetic Particle event produced the strongest increase of the radiation environment measured by the Radiation Assessment Detector on the surface of Mars since landing in August 2012. We report the details of the measurements of the energetic particle environment from Radiation Assessment Detector in Gale crater during this event. The Solar Energetic Particle event increased the low‐energy proton flux (below 100 MeV) by a factor of 30, and the higher‐energy proton flux by a factor of 4, above preevent levels. The 4 He flux (below 100 MeV/nuc) rose by factors up to 10, and neutral particles by a factor of 2 above background. The increase started on 10 September around 19:50 UTC, peak‐level fluxes were reached on the morning of 11 September and prevailed for about 10 hr before decreasing toward background levels. The onset of a Forbush decrease on 13 September decreased the proton flux below preevent intensities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018gl077801

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RAD has detected only a few SEP events on Mars over eight years of operation, and all were small apart from the 2017 September 10 event.

    “During the 8 years of measurement on Mars, RAD has detected only a few solar particle events (distinguished as five peaks in the dose rate) as shown previously in Fig. 4, all of which are small apart from the 2017 September 10th event (Zeitlin et al. 2018;Ehresmann et al. 2018;Guo et al. 2018a;Hassler et al. 2018).”

    From Radiation environment for future human exploration on the surface of Mars: the current understanding based on MSL/RAD dose measurements (2021) · cites this paper as Ehresmann et al. 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During the 2017-09-10 SEP event, the flux of protons with energies below about 100 MeV increased by a factor of 30.

    “RAD observed that the flux of protons with energies below about 100 MeV was increased by a factor of 30 (Ehresmann et al. 2018;Hassler et al. 2018), and the dose rate doubled over the course of several hours after the event onset.”
  • The total dose from the 10 September 2017 event observed with the MSL-RAD B sub-detector was 347 μGy in Si.

    “The total dose from the event observed with the MSL-RAD B sub-detector was 347 µGy in Si (Zeitlin et al., 2018;Ehresmann et al., 2018;Hassler et at., 2018).”

    From The Solar Particle Event on 10 September 2017 as observed onboard the International Space Station (ISS) (2018) · cites this paper as Ehresmann et al., 2018

    The Introduction (p. 6) and Discussion (p. 14) describe RAD measurements of particle flux during the September 2017 event, while §2.1 (p. 7) identifies detector B as a silicon diode. Our copy does not report a total dose of 347 µGy in Si for detector B; searches for “347” and total absorbed dose found no such measurement. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehresmann, B., Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Guo, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Matthiä, D., Lohf, H., Burmeister, S., Rafkin, S. C. R., Berger, T., & Reitz, G.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Leidos (United States) (US)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Department for Extraterrestrial Physics Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel Kiel Germany
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Ehresmann, B.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
5305-5311
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2803672968
Cited by
38
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1273039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Keywords
solar energetic particle events, Mars radiation environment, Radiation Assessment Detector, Gale Crater, helium flux, neutral particle flux, Forbush decreases, Mars surface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review