Cited by 15Planetary Science and ExplorationRadiation Therapy and DosimetryAstro and Planetary Science

Natural Radiation Shielding on Mars Measured With the MSL/RAD Instrument

Open access
Ehresmann, B., Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Guo, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Khaksari, S., Loeffler, S.·2021·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

Protecting astronauts from the effects of space radiation remains one major stepping stone for the exploration of Mars. Long‐term exposure to radiation can lead to severe health effects and affects allowable mission duration. Mission designs for Mars include the use of radiation shelters that provide additional mass to surround the astronauts. This leads to incoming radiation losing energy through ionization processes. This is important during solar energetic particle events when solar protons can reach the surface with high intensities. Additionally, shelters provide a long‐term reduction of the exposure to galactic cosmic rays. As mass is an important time and cost factor in space travel, using natural sheltering already on Mars is a desirable option. One candidate is to use subterranean lava tubes that provide shelter from the radiation from above. Other options include craters, cliff walls, or rock overhangs. Here, we present the first in situ measurements of radiation sheltering by natural environments on the surface of Mars. The data were acquired with the Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) on board the Curiosity rover in Gale crater on Mars. We show measurements from when Curiosity was parked close to Butte M12 in the Murray Buttes formation, which blocked out 19% of the surrounding sky view. During this time, from Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) sol 1456–1467, we find a decrease of 4% in the expected dose rate, and a decrease of 7.5% in the neutral particle environment. This proof of principle is an important step to validate plans to use natural sheltering on Mars.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2021je006851

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An existing geological structure such as a simple butte may serve as a potential radiation shelter for future habitats on Mars.

    “This is the first direct illustration that an existing geological structure such as a simple butte may serve as a potential radiation shelter for future habitats on Mars (Ehresmann et al. 2021;Guo et al. 2021).”

    From Radiation environment for future human exploration on the surface of Mars: the current understanding based on MSL/RAD dose measurements (2021) · cites this paper as Ehresmann et al. 2021

    The Introduction describes the Butte M12 measurements as the first in situ evidence of radiation sheltering by a natural rock formation on Mars. The Summary and Conclusions says smaller buttes could provide temporary shelter during off-base excursions, but identifies underground lava tubes—not buttes—as the most promising base locations. It therefore supports the sheltering potential, but not the specific suggestion of a butte as shelter for a future habitat. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sheltering at the vicinity of a butte can be useful for field excursions away from habitats, as suggested by RAD observations during the time Curiosity was parked in the Murray buttes region.

    “When planning for field excursions away from such habitats, sheltering at the vicinity of a butte can also be useful, as suggested by the RAD observations during the time Curiosity was parked in the Murray buttes region (Ehresmann et al. 2021;Guo et al. 2021, and see Sect. 5).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]4. Ehresmann, B. (2021). Data to reproduce figures in Ehresmann et al. (2021). JGR planets (version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.5031235
  2. [20]20. Möller, T., Ehresmann, B., Labrenz, J., & Panitzsch, L. (2013). Radiation measurements on the stratospheric balloon BEXUS 13. 21st ESA symposium on European rocket and balloon programmes and related research (pp. 637-640). Noordwijk, Netherlands: ESA Special Publ. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4096.2565 · DOI
  3. [21]21. Peterson, J., Rafkin, S., Zeitlin, C., Ehresmann, B., Weigle, E., Jeffers, S., & Hassler, D. M. (2013). MSL Mars radiation assessment detector RDR V1.0, MSL-M-RAD-3-RDR-V1.0. NASA Planetary Data System. https://doi.org/10.17189/1519761 · DOI
  4. [23]23. Rafkin, S., Peterson, J., Zeitlin, C., Ehresmann, B., Weigle, E., & Hassler, D. M. (2013). MSL Mars radiation assessment detector EDR V1.0, MSL-M-RAD-2-EDR-V1.0. NASA Planetary Data System. https://doi.org/10.17189/1519760 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehresmann, B., Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Guo, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Khaksari, S., & Loeffler, S.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Leidos (United States) (US)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
Corresponding author
Ehresmann, B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2021-08
Volume
126
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9100
OpenAlex
W3190201770
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (1273039)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (50QM0501, 50QM1201, 50QM1701)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
Mars radiation environment, Mars surface, solar energetic particles, galactic cosmic rays, Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity rover, Radiation Assessment Detector, lava tubes, Gale Crater, astronaut radiation protection, dose rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review