Cited by 2,788Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth and Well-being StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey.

Sarason, Irwin G., Johnson, James H., Siegel, Judith M.·1978·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This article describes the development of a new instrument, the Life Experiences Survey, for the measurement of life changes. It was designed to eliminate certain shortcomings of previous life stress measures and allows for separate assessment of positive and negative life experiences as well as individualize d ratings of the impact of events. Several studies bearing on the usefulness of the Life Experiences Survey are presented, and the implications of the findings are discussed. During recent years, numerous studies have investigated the relationship between life stress and susceptibility to physical and psychological problems. Most of these studies have been based on the assumptions that (a) life changes require adaptation on the part of the individual and are stressful, and (b) persons experiencing marked degrees of life change during the recent past are susceptible to physical and psychiatric problems. There is considerable evidence that a relationship exists between life stress, operationally defined in terms of self-reported life changes, and physical illness (Dohrenwcnd & Dohrenwend, 1974b). Rahe and Lind (1971) have reported a relationship between life stress and sudden cardiac death. Theorcll and Rahe (1971) and Edwards (1971) have provided data suggestive of a link between life stress and myocardial infarction. Holmes (1970) and Rahe (1968) both found a relationship between life stress and major and minor health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.46.5.932

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1978
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
932-946
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2089349199
Cited by
2,788
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 85
FWCI
32.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
life change, life events, Life Experiences Survey, instrument development, physical illness, mental illness, sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, health effects of stress
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review