Cited by 1,252Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Differences and ValuesMental Health Treatment and Access

Culture and social support.

Open access
Kim, Heejung S., Sherman, David K., Taylor, Shelley E.·2008·American Psychologist

Abstract

Social support is one of the most effective means by which people can cope with stressful events. Yet little research has examined whether there are cultural differences in how people utilize their social support networks. A review of studies on culture and social support presents evidence that Asians and Asian Americans are more reluctant to explicitly ask for support from close others than are European Americans because they are more concerned about the potentially negative relational consequences of such behaviors. Asians and Asian Americans are more likely to use and benefit from forms of support that do not involve explicit disclosure of personal stressful events and feelings of distress. Discussion centers on the potential implications of these findings for intercultural interactions and for the use of mental health services by Asians and Asian Americans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies on IU, stress, and media consumption have been conducted in North America and Western Europe, which limits the cross-cultural application of the findings.

    “Most studies on IU, stress, and media consumption have been conducted in North America and Western Europe, which limits the cross-cultural application of the findings.”
  • American and European populations report high levels of uncertainty-induced stress due to political instability and economic downturns, while research from East Asia suggests that collectivist cultures may use different coping mechanisms, such as social cohesion and community-based stress buffering.

    “For example, while American and European populations report high levels of uncertainty-induced stress due to political instability and economic downturns, research from East Asia suggests that collectivist cultures may use different coping mechanisms, such as social cohesion and community-based stress buffering [165].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2008
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
518-526
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2018535391
Cited by
1,252
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 50
FWCI
103.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-033863; BCS-0729532)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
social support, culture, cultural differences, Asian Americans, European Americans, help-seeking, stress coping, intercultural interaction, mental health service utilization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Asian, Culture, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review