Cited by 239Social and Intergroup PsychologyConflict Management and NegotiationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation.

Cohen, Geoffrey L., Sherman, David K., Bastardi, Anthony, Hsu, Lillian, McGoey, Michelle, Ross, Lee·2007·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies link resistance to probative information and intransigence in negotiation to concerns of identity maintenance. Each shows that affirmations of personal integrity (vs. nonaffirmation or threat) can reduce resistance and intransigence but that this effect occurs only when individuals' partisan identity and/or identity-related convictions are made salient. Affirmation made participants' assessment of a report critical of U.S. foreign policy less dependent on their political views, but only when the identity relevance of the issue rather than the goal of rationality was salient (Study 1). Affirmation increased concession making in a negotiation over abortion policy, but again this effect was moderated by identity salience (Studies 2 and 3). Indeed, although affirmed negotiators proved relatively more open to compromise when either the salience of their true convictions or the importance of remaining faithful to those convictions was heightened, the reverse was true when the salient goal was compromise. The theoretical and applied significance of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a negotiation over abortion rights, participants whose commitment to their political views had been made salient proved responsive to affirmation; when affirmed, they made more compromises and left the negotiation with stronger trust of the advocate on the other side.

    “In a negotiation over abortion rights, participants whose commitment to their political views had been made salient proved responsive to affirmation.When affirmed, they made more compromises in a negotiation over abortion legislation, and they left the negotiation with stronger trust of the advocate on the other side of the issue”
  • When the salient identity was being an open-minded negotiator, affirmation led people to be more closed-minded.

    “When the salient identity was being an open-minded negotiator, affirmation led people to be more closed-minded (Cohen et al. 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2007-09
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
415-430
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2139114136
Cited by
239
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
34.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-affirmation, partisan identity, negotiation, intransigence, identity preservation, compromise, identity salience, partisanship
MeSH terms
Adult, Culture, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Persuasive Communication, Pilot Projects, Politics, Public Policy, Self Concept, Social Identification, Stereotyping, Negotiating, September 11 Terrorist Attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review