Cited by 578Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making.

Bandura, Albert, Jourden, Forest J.·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.941

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1991-06
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
941-951
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2119401948
Cited by
578
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social comparison, self-regulation, complex decision-making, decision-making, self-control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review