Cited by 213Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity.

Roese, Neal J., Hur, Taekyun, Pennington, Ginger L.·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Counterfactual thinking is associated with regulatory focus in a way that explains previous empirical incongruities, such as whether additive counterfactuals (mutations of inactions) occur more or less frequently than subtractive counterfactuals (mutations of actions). In Experiment 1, regulatory focus moderated this pattern, in that additive counterfactuals were activated by promotion failure, whereas subtractive counterfactuals were activated by prevention failure. In Experiment 2, additive counterfactuals evoked a promotion focus and expressed causal sufficiency, whereas subtractive counterfactuals evoked a prevention focus and expressed causal necessity. In Experiment 3, dejection activated additive counterfactuals, whereas agitation activated subtractive counterfactuals. These findings illuminate the interconnections among counterfactual thinking, motivation, and goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1109

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1109-1120
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2075185513
Cited by
213
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH55578)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
counterfactual reasoning, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, causal sufficiency, causal necessity, dejection, agitation, motivation, goal pursuit
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review