The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Abstract
Experiment 1 used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998) to measure self-esteem by assessing automatic associations of self with positive or negative valence. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that two IAT measures defined a factor that was distinct from, but weakly correlated with, a factor defined by standard explicit (self-report) measures of self-esteem. Experiment 2 tested known-groups validity of two IAT gender self-concept measures. Compared with well-established explicit measures, the IAT measures revealed triple the difference in measured masculinity-femininity between men and women. Again, CFA revealed construct divergence between implicit and explicit measures. Experiment 3 assessed the self-esteem IAT's validity in predicting cognitive reactions to success and failure. High implicit self-esteem was associated in the predicted fashion with buffering against adverse effects of failure on two of four measures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar tendencies have been demonstrated previously, wherein adults displayed faster response times when associating the self with positive attributes (34).”
From Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,014
Morrison, K. R., Wheeler, S. C., & Miller, D. T. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.005 · Cited by 38
“…through defensive thoughts and behaviors (e.g., claiming to hold strong attitudes, being narcissistic, disengaging following task failure), especially when their sense of self is called into question (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Gregg & Sedikides, 2010; McGregor & Jordan, 2007; Zeigler-Hill, 2006).”
BackgroundWhat is implicit about implicit self-esteem?
Križan, Z. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.002 · Cited by 38
Zong-huo, Y., Wang, F., Wang, D., et al. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.3.289 · Cited by 37
van Well, S., Kolk, A. M. M., & Klugkist, I. G. (2008) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445507309030 · Cited by 37
“To measure gender role identification indirectly, the GIAT (Aidman & Carroll, 2003; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) was used.”
MethodRomantic jealousy and implicit and explicit self-esteem
Stieger, S., Preyss, A. V., & Voracek, M. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.028 · Cited by 36
Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes‐Holmes, Y. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.839 · Cited by 36
“Participants were presented with two feeling thermometers, adapted from Greenwald and Farnham (2000), which assessed feelings towards overweight and slim people, respectively on five-point scales (1=very warm; 5=very cold).”
MethodThe Role of Self-Concepts in Emerging Adult Depression: A Systematic Research Synthesis
Reed‐Fitzke, K. (2019) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-018-09324-7 · Cited by 46
Self and identity in social anxiety disorder
Gilboa‐Schechtman, E., Keshet, H., Peschard, V., & Azoulay, R. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12455 · Cited by 36
How Do Individuals with Fragile High Self-esteem Cope with Intrusive Thoughts Following Ego Threat?
Borton, J. L. S., Crimmins, A. E., Ashby, R. S., & Ruddiman, J. F. (2010) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.500935 · Cited by 36
“Implicit self-esteem was assessed with the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), administered on a Macintosh G4 computer running the program PsyScope (Borton, Oakes, Van Wyk, & Zink, 2007; Cohen, MacWhinney, Flatt, & Provost, 1993).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA match made in the laboratory: Persuasion and matches to primed traits and stereotypes
Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.007 · Cited by 36
“They then completed an Implicit Association Task assessing their automatic identification with the group (see Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), as evidenced by the level of association between ‘‘self” and ‘‘African-American” vs. ‘‘self” and ‘‘White.””
MethodBernstein, M. J., Claypool, H. M., Young, S. G., Tuscherer, T., Sacco, D. F., & Brown, C. M. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213495281 · Cited by 37
“Specifically, participants completed a Self-Esteem Implicit Association Task (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), which measures automatic associations between self-relevant words (e.g., me, my, I) and pleasant words (e.g., happy, laughter, peace).”
Sukhera, J. I., Wodzinski, M., Teunissen, P. W., Lingard, L. A., & Watling, C. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002382 · Cited by 35
Hennigs, N., Wiedmann, K., Behrens, S. H., Klarmann, C., & Carduck, J. (2013) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management · doi:10.1108/jfmm-03-2013-0022 · Cited by 35
“The other blocks were not considered, due to the fact that the reaction time here is usually longer (see Greenwald et al., 1998; Greenwald and Farnham, 2000) and more likely to fulfill the purpose of a training effect.”
BackgroundRaedt, R. D., Franck, E., Fannes, K., & Verstraeten, E. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.004 · Cited by 34
Møller, J., & Trautwein, U. (2014) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41291-2_8 · Cited by 35
Is implicit self-esteem linked to shape and weight concerns in restrained and unrestrained eaters?
Hoffmeister, K., Teige‐Mocigemba, S., Jens Blechert, A., Klauer, K. C., & Tuschen‐Caffier, B. (2009) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.009 · Cited by 33
“The performance difference between the two critical combined phases is known as the IAT effect, which is assumed to measure ‘‘how much easier it is for subjects to categorize self items with pleasant items than self items with unpleasant items’’ (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000, p. 1024).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialImplicit cognitive processes in binge-eating disorder and obesity
Brauhardt, A., Rudolph, A., & Hilbert, A. (2014) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.01.001 · Cited by 33
Peck, J. A., & Hogue, M. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.001 · Cited by 48
Hoppen, T. H., Heinz-Fischer, I., & Nexhmedin Morina, B. (2020) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2020.1737453 · Cited by 31
“The authors conducted an Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) using stimuli representing the self (i.e. presentvs. past-self) and stimulus attributes (i.e. positive vs. negative).”
Method5 Habit: From Overt Action to Mental Events
Verplanken, B. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377798.003.0005 · Cited by 34
Kesting, M.-L., Mehl, S., Rief, W., Lindenmeyer, J., & Lincoln, T. M. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.036 · Cited by 43
Components of Implicit Stigma against Mental Illness among Chinese Students
Wang, X.-G., Huang, X.-T., Jackson, T., & Chen, R.-J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046016 · Cited by 37
“These measurement techniques are limited to measuring the relative strengths of pairs of associations rather than absolute strengths of single associations [15].”
BackgroundCultural Stereotypes and the Self: A Closer Examination of Implicit Self-Stereotyping
Lun, J., Sinclair, S. A., & Cogburn, C. D. (2009) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530902880340 · Cited by 34
“Previous research has shown that women are more likely to associate feminine traits with the self than masculine traits (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), but the self-stereotyping effect was confounded with the positive nature of feminine traits and the study did not specifically examine trait valence.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBlaison, C., Chassard, D., Kop, J., & Gana, K. (2006) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503306002065 · Cited by 22
Evaluating explicit and implicit death attitudes in funeral and university students
Bassett, J. F., & Dabbs, J. M. (2003) · Mortality · doi:10.1080/13576270310001604022 · Cited by 37
“…over insects than do university students, Citrin & Greenwald, 1998), and to measure individual differences in racism (Greenwald et al., 1998; Dusgupta et al., 2000), sexism (Rudman & Killianski, 2000), self-esteem (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), and political preference (Nosek & Banaji, 2001a).”
BackgroundBen‐Eliyahu, A., & Zeidner, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.041 · Cited by 33
Gassing, braking, and self-regulating: Error self-regulation, well-being, and goal-related processes
Robinson, M. D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.009 · Cited by 33
van Tuijl, L. A., Bennik, E. C., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Spinhoven, P., & de Jong, P. J. (2020) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000634 · Cited by 32
Zack, M. H., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., Loba, P., & Fragopoulos, F. (2005) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-005-3102-z · Cited by 32
Who Wants To Be ... Erudite? Everyone! Evidence For Automatic Adaptation Of Trait Definitions
Wentura, D., & Greve, W. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.1.30.30981 · Cited by 32
What’s really in a Name-Letter Effect? Name-letter preferences as indirect measures of self-esteem
Hoorens, V. (2014) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.980085 · Cited by 38
“Today, letter preference tasks are among the most popular implicit self-esteem measures, surpassed only by the Implicit Association Test (Buhrmester, Blanton, & Swann, 2011; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
BackgroundWang, X.-Q., Zhu, J.-C., Huo, J.-Y., Liu, M., & Ye, B. (2020) · European Journal of Teaching and Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1827385 · Cited by 30
Attitudes as propositional representations
Houwer, J. D., Dessel, P. V., & Moran, T. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003 · Cited by 31
Jaeckle, T., Williams, S., Barker, G. J., Basilio, R., Carr, E., Goldsmith, K., Colasanti, A., Giampietro, V., Cleare, A. J., Young, A. H., et al. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721004797 · Cited by 36
A Close Encounter with Personal Bias: Pedagogical Implications for Teacher Education
Clark, P., & Zygmunt, E. (2014) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.83.2.0147 · Cited by 32
“While some research shows a weak relationship between implicit bias and behavior (Karpinski & Hilton, 2001), other studies have demonstrated strong predictive validity (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Rudman & Glick, 2001).”
ResultDemattè, M. L., Sanabria, D., & Spence, C. J. (2006) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.001 · Cited by 32
Dietl, E., Meurs, J. A., & Blickle, G. (2016) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2016.1225040 · Cited by 35
“The IAT is robust to attempts at faking (Asendorpf et al., 2002), demonstrates acceptable internal consistency (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) and has test–retest reliability (Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007).”
BackgroundBagozzi, R. P. (2005) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1548-6435(2005)0000002005 · Cited by 31
Advances in the Treatment of Adult Incarcerated Sex Offenders
Mann, R. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470714362.ch18 · Cited by 32
Murthy, D., Bowman, S. A., Gross, A., & Mcgarry, M. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12176 · Cited by 32
“In developing our groupings, we extended to Twitter data word lists developed by Greenwald and Farnham (2000) for use in Implicit Association Tests (IAT), an associative psychosocial personality test often used to test positive and negative associations with self and other.”
MethodInfluentialOverlap between Mental Representations of Self and Brand
Trump, R. K., & Brucks, M. L. (2011) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.595083 · Cited by 31
“Further, the self may be differentially related to various other concepts in memory, with some concepts being more relevant to one’s self-definition than others (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
BackgroundDevos, T., & Torres, J. A. C. (2007) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530701503432 · Cited by 38
“For example, men and women automatically linked attributes stereotypical of their gender to the self (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Rudman, Greenwald, & McGhee, 2001).”
BackgroundMcQuade, J. D., Mendoza, S. A., Larsen, K. L., & Breaux, R. (2016) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0172-6 · Cited by 38
“As in past IAT research on the self, concept words associated with BMe^ (me, I, my, mine) and BOthers^ (others, they, them, theirs) were used for the target stimuli (Greenwald and Farnham 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWillard, G., & Gramzow, R. H. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.012 · Cited by 30
Morality stereotyping as a basis of women’s in-group favoritism: An implicit approach
Leach, C., Carraro, L., Garcia, R. L., & Kang, J. (2017) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430215603462 · Cited by 27
The strength to face the facts: Self-regulation defends against defensive information processing
Ruttan, R. L., & Nordgren, L. F. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.006 · Cited by 32
Shang, Z., Wang, L., & Wu, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00008 · Cited by 30
“…of the stimuli in our paradigm, this finding is explained by the ownership effect and is consistent with previous studies showing that individuals generally respond faster to self-related items such as one’s own name, phone number, or face photos (Greenwald and Farnham, 2000; Ma and Han, 2010).”
Validating Measures of Leader Authenticity
Randolph-Seng, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2012) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051812464780 · Cited by 30
“It is widely known that most people like themselves (Banaji & Prentice, 1994); however, even when someone cannot consciously verbalize this bias for self, it is still there (Aidman & Carroll, 2003; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
BackgroundThe impact of an implicit manipulation of self-esteem on body dissatisfaction
Svaldi, J., Zimmermann, S., & Naumann, E. (2011) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.08.003 · Cited by 30
Devos, T., Blanco, K., Rico, F., & Dunn, R. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9430-6 · Cited by 32
Wegener, I., Geiser, F., Alfter, S., Mierke, J., Imbierowicz, K., Kleiman, A., Koch, A. S., & Conrad, R. (2014) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.12.001 · Cited by 40
A Relational Frame Theory Contribution to Social Categorization
Weinstein, J., Wilson, K., Drake, C., & Kellum, K. (2008) · Behavior and Social Issues · doi:10.5210/bsi.v17i1.406 · Cited by 30
Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of Implicit and Explicit Self-esteem Correspondence
LeBel, E. P. (2009) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860902979166 · Cited by 30
“Two of the most commonly used indirect measures of self-esteem include the Self-Esteem Implicit Association Test (SE-IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000 ) and the Name Letter Task (NLT; Nuttin, 1985 , 1987 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWoerner, J. I., Köpetz, C., Lechner, W. V., & Lejuez, C. W. (2016) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.006 · Cited by 36
The “modest mask”? An investigation of vulnerable narcissists' implicit self-esteem
Brown, A. A., & Brunell, A. B. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.020 · Cited by 29
Roth, J., Steffens, M. C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479 · Cited by 35
Winter, D., Steeb, L., Herbert, C., Sedikides, C., Schmahl, C. G., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.07.008 · Cited by 37
Gao, R., Huang, S., Yao, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, S., Cai, S., Zuo, H., Zhan, Z., & Mo, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903411 · Cited by 36
“As the descriptive terms for negative zhongyong were pejorative, in Study 2 we adopted an Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 6 June 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 903411 implicit association test (IAT) tominimize social desirability bias.”
MethodInfluentialThe self-concept is represented in the medial prefrontal cortex in terms of self-importance
Levorsen, M., Aoki, R., Matsumoto, K., Sedikides, C., & Izuma, K. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2178-22.2023 · Cited by 35
“Given that associative strength is considered responsible for reaction time facilitation or inhibition during the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998, 2002), our findings generate a hypothesis about reaction time facilitation (e.g., priming effects) based on information self-importance, but not self…”
BackgroundHawes, D. J., Helyer, R., Herlianto, E. C., & Willing, J. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.723264 · Cited by 29
“This idiographic information provided two of the word stimuli for the ‘‘self’’ category; such stimuli has been found to strongly activate associations with the self (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
BackgroundPersönlichkeitseigenschaften, Intelligenz und Erfolg im Beruf
Hulsheger, U. R., & Maier, G. W. (2008) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042.59.2.108 · Cited by 30
Self-esteem, entrepreneurial mindset, and entrepreneurial intention: A moderated mediation model
Akbari, M., Irani, H. R., Zamani, Z., Valizadeh, N., & Arab, S. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100934 · Cited by 37
Understanding Western‐East Asian Differences and Similarities in Self‐Enhancement
Boucher, H. C. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00266.x · Cited by 28
Rivera, L. M., & Paredez, S. M. (2014) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12057 · Cited by 28
“These results conceptually replicate research on group-level self-stereotyping—on average, stereotypic self-ratings (e.g., feminine traits) of stereotyped-relevant groups (e.g., women) are higher than those of stereotypedirrelevant groups (e.g., men; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Guimond et al., 2007).”
Alexithymia increases the discordance between implicit and explicit self-esteem
Dentale, F., Martini, P. S., Coro, A. D., et al. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.022 · Cited by 28
Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. (2006) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.4.387 · Cited by 28
“Although previous research using the IAT has used positive and negative attributes as cognitive representations of valence in memory (Greenwald et al., 2002; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), or semantically meaningful representations of the self ( Greenwald & Farnham, 2000 ), no researc…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRotten to the core: Neuroticism and implicit evaluations of the self
Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2005) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860500241852 · Cited by 28
“The words were also used in prior studies by Greenwald and Farnham (2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAsian Variability in Performance Rating Modesty and Leniency Bias
Barron, L. G., & Sackett, P. R. (2008) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959280802137754 · Cited by 28
“In contrast, the fact that Americans self-enhance both implicitly and explicitly ( Greenwald & Farnham, 2000 ; Johnson, 1986) does not bode well for Americans preparing for overseas assignment or for American organizations that would like to see their employees more fully recognize their weaknesses so as to more readi…”
BackgroundHughes, S., & Barnes‐Holmes, D. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118489857.ch10 · Cited by 30
“Our ‘self-beliefs’, ‘self-esteem’ and ‘self-concepts’ are argued to shape our thoughts and feelings (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) while our ‘self-discipline’, ‘selfcontrol’ and ‘self-efficacy’ influence how we behave towards ourselves and others (Zimmerman, 2000).”
BackgroundHensels, I. S., & Baines, S. (2016) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2016.05.005 · Cited by 26
Belletier, C., Robert, A., Moták, L., & Izaute, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.029 · Cited by 27
Kallitsounaki, A., & Williams, D. M. (2022) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-022-02386-5 · Cited by 34
“…however, Kallitsounaki and Williams (2020a) examined how the strength of gender self-concept varies according to the number of ASDlike traits manifested by people from the general population, using not only an explicit measure, but also an Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
BackgroundUsing implicit measures to highlight science teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence
Mascret, N., Roussel, P., & Cury, F. (2015) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0249-6 · Cited by 30
“A problem soon arose with the concept of intelligence: in the IAT procedure, many attitude objects had a complementary category (Greenwald and Farnham 2000), and it was interesting to compare one with the other (e.”
BackgroundFayant, M., Dominique Muller, B., Nurra, C., Alexopoulos, T., & Palluel-Germain, R. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.013 · Cited by 28
“…domain, Kawakami, Steele, Cifa, Phills, and Dovidio (2008) showed that information (math related concepts) processed while performing approach (vs. avoidance) arm movements was later associated with the self-concept—as measured with a me/not me Implicit Association Test (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
MethodDeYoung, C. G., & Blain, S. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.026 · Cited by 34
Ritter, V., Leichsenring, F., Strauss, B. M., & Stangier, U. (2013) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.802824 · Cited by 27
“An Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) was administered to measure the relative strengths of automatic positive and negative associations of a person towards the self and others.”
BackgroundThe Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure As a Measure of Self-Esteem
Timko, C. A., England, E. L., Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (2010) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395739 · Cited by 26
“Participants completed a feeling thermometer (adapted from Greenwald & Farnham, 2000, and described previously) for each of the six words (stupid, smart, ugly, attractive, shy, friendly) used on the IRAP. procedure Participants presented to the research laboratory individually.”
MethodRoth, J., & Steffens, M. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000169 · Cited by 21
An Application of the LC-LSTM Framework to the Self-esteem Instability Case
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., & Tisak, J. (2013) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9326-4 · Cited by 26
“Implicit Self-esteem The Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), implemented online through Inquisit computer program (Millisecond Software, 2000) was used to assess implicit self-esteem.”
BackgroundMethodChinese Undergraduates’ Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Toward Persons With Disabilities
Chen, S., Ma, L., & Zhang, J. (2011) · Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0034355211410705 · Cited by 25
“It has been used to study attitudes toward race, self-concept, and other constructs (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Greenwald et al., 1998; McConnell & Leibold, 2001; Rudman, Greenwald, Mellott, & Schwartz, 1999).”
MethodRomero, N., Sánchez-López, Á., Vázquez, C., & Valiente, C. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.003 · Cited by 31
“In contrast, other studies using different approaches, such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald and Farnham, 2000) and the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek and Banaji, 2001) have found mixed support for the presence of low implicit selfesteem in depressed compared to…”
ResultStewart, C., Rogers, F., Pilch, M., Stewart, I., Barnes‐Holmes, Y., & Westermann, S. (2017) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 34
Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem: Measure for Measure
Oakes, M. A., Brown, J. D., & Cai, H. (2008) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.778 · Cited by 26
Faculty narcissism and student outcomes in business higher education: A student-faculty fit analysis
Westerman, J. W., Whitaker, B. G., Bergman, J. Z., Bergman, S. M., & Daly, J. P. (2016) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2016.02.001 · Cited by 24
Mõttus, R., Wood, D., Condon, D. M., Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Greiff, S., Johnson, W., Lukaszewski, A. W., et al. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hvk5p · Cited by 28
Alessandri, G., Zuffianò, A., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., & Tisak, J. (2016) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1137223 · Cited by 24
“The Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & farnham, 2000; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), implemented online through Inquisit computer program (Millisecond Software, 2000) was used to assess implicit self-esteem.”
MethodImplicit and explicit attitudes in transportation research: A literature review
Tosi, J. D., Haworth, N. L., Díaz‐Lázaro, C. M., Poó, F. M., & Ledesma, R. D. (2021) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.014 · Cited by 27
Self‐Worth and Politics: The Distinctive Roles of Self‐Esteem and Narcissism
Cichocka, A. K., Marchlewska, M., & Cisłak, A. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12897 · Cited by 35
Huntsinger, J. R. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211410069 · Cited by 25
“Consistent with past research (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Jordan et al., 2007), implicit and explicit self-esteem were uncorrelated, r(113) = .03, p = .74.”
MethodResultDevelopment and Initial Validation of an Implicit Measure of Religiousness-Spirituality
LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., Thedford, M., & Tsang, J.-A. C. (2010) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01521.x · Cited by 29
The Mirror of Mind: Visualizing Mental Representations of Self Through Reverse Correlation
Moon, K., Kim, S., Kim, J., Kim, H., & Ko, Y.-G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01149 · Cited by 25
Bluemke, M., & Fiedler, K. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.010 · Cited by 26
The Experimental Investigation of Religious CognitionPreprint
Gibson, N. J. S. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/mxwfc · Cited by 25
Scott, W. D., Cervone, D., & Ebiringah, O. U. (2024) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.13125 · Cited by 28
Jordan, C. H., Logel, C. R., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.7.703 · Cited by 25
Lindgren, K. P., Kaysen, D., Werntz, A., Gasser, M. L., & Teachman, B. (2013) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.03.003 · Cited by 21
“Stimuli were derived from other self-appraisal or self-concept IATs (e.g., Devos, 2006; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Lindgren et al., 2012), clinical examples from twostudy co-authors (Kaysen & Lindgren), and self-report measures of PSTD-related cognitions.”
MethodMaison, D. A., & Maliszewski, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01830 · Cited by 24
“…a racial implicit attitude (Greenwald et al., 1998; Dasgupta and Greenwald, 2001; Greenwald and Nosek, 2001), self-concept (Farnham et al., 1999; Greenwald and Farnham, 2000; Greenwald et al., 2002), self-esteem (Farnham et al., 1999; Greenwald et al., 2002), gender stereotypes (e.g., Rudman et…”
Backgroundvan Tuijl, L. A., Glashouwer, K. A., Bockting, C., Tendeiro, J. N., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & de Jong, P. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166116 · Cited by 30
Self-Concept of Gifted Children Aged 9 to 13 Years Old
Shi, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, X. (2008) · journal for the education of the gifted · doi:10.4219/jeg-2008-791 · Cited by 24
“The discrepancy between the results of our findings and other studies (Zeidner & Schleyer, 1998; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) might be attributed to social conditions, especially child-rearing styles, on child development.”
MethodResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1022-1038
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4231600766
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 85.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K05MH001533, R01MH041328, MH-57672, MH41328, MH01533, R01MH057672)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Implicit Association Test, self-esteem, self-concept, implicit attitudes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Microcomputers, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Software, Word Association Tests, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review