Cited by 454Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHuman Behavior and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

It's not just the amount that counts: Balanced need-satisfaction also affects well-being

Sheldon, Kennon M., Niemiec, Christopher P.·2006·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness have been found to have unique additive effects on psychological well-being (see E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan, 2000). In the present study, the authors extended these findings by examining whether the balance in the satisfaction of these 3 needs is also important. The results of 4 studies showed that people who experienced balanced need satisfaction reported higher well-being than those with the same sum score who reported greater variability in need satisfaction. This finding emerged for multiple measures of needs and adjustment and was independent of neuroticism. Moreover, results were obtained consistently across concurrent, prospective, daily diary, and observer-report study designs. Discussion focuses on the psychological meaning and functional implications of balanced need satisfaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.331

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Costa, 1989, NEO-PI/FFI manual Suppl.
  3. deCharms, 1968, Personal causation.
  4. McClelland, 1985, Human motivation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2006-08
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
331-341
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2021791208
Cited by
454
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 29
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
basic psychological needs, need satisfaction, psychological well-being, autonomy, competence, relatedness, self-determination theory, daily diary
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review