CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 523Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 240 of the 240 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic and effortful processing in depression.

Hartlage, Shirley, Alloy, Lauren B., Vázquez, Carmelo, Dykman, Benjamin·1993·Psychological Bulletin
DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.247
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Automatic processes require few attentional resources, but effortful processes use attentional capacity. Research on cognitive processing by depressed individuals is reviewed and the following is concluded: (a) Depression interferes with effortful processing. The degree of interference is determined by the degree of effortfulness of the task, the severity of depression, and the valence of the stimulus material to be processed. (b) Depression interferes only minimally with automatic processes. Hypothetical causal mechanisms for interference in effortful processes by depression, whether interference in effortful processing is unique to depression or characteristic of psychopathology in general, and whether negative automatic thoughts are associated with current depression or depression proneness are also addressed. The effortful-automatic perspective has implications for understanding depressive clinical features, treating depression, and conducting future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.247

Cites

240 of 240 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 523

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hartlage, S., Alloy, L. B., Vázquez, C., & Dykman, B.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1993
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
247-278
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
DOI
10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.247
OpenAlex
W2080588816
Cited by
523
References
240
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression, automatic processing, effortful processing, attentional resources, cognitive interference, stimulus valence, negative automatic thoughts, depression proneness, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Attention, Depressive Disorder, Physical Exertion, Humans, Mental Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review