Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,100 of 1,102

Preface
(2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.002.0001
Dedication
(2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.001.0001.002.005
Copyright Page
(2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.001.0001.002.004
Status Quo Bias and Poaching Avoidance in Selecting Strategic Alliance PartnersPreprint
Ratchford, M., Chakravarti, D., & Sinha, A. R. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2210709
The Effect of “Team” Versus “Group” Audit Format Characteristics on Risk Assessments Made by Audit Partners
Kent, D. D., Arnold, D. F., & Schmee, J. (2003) · Accounting Finance & Governance Review/Accounting finance & governance review · doi:10.52399/001c.35304
Bibliographie
Allard‐Poesi, F. (2012) · Dunod eBooks · doi:10.3917/dunod.allar.2012.01.0119
Does size matter in group decision making? Simulation experiments with LNG professionals bidding in auction markets
Otamendi, F. J., & Muñoz, F. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · doi:10.3926/jiem.4021
Illustrating Preferences in Multi-stakeholder System Development Projects through Vignettes
Weger, K., Leder, S., Eaton, C., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661155
Opinion Homogenization and Polarization
Konovalova, E., & Mens, G. L. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009002042.024
Sampling as a Tool in Social Environments
Fiedler, K., Juslin, P., & Denrell, J. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009002042.020
Sozialer Einfluss
Hewstone, M., & Martin, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65297-8_8
Tunnelling design management – Particularities in design processes and setup of teams
Katsaris, D., Pline, C., & Vincens, M. (2023) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003348030-412
The Role of Group Context in Open-Minded Cognition
Moaz, S., Berryman, K., Winget, J. R., Tindale, R. S., & Ottati, V. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197655467.003.0008
Influence and Similarity in Social Networks: A Study of the Opinion Dynamics Among Teenagers Through an Agent-Based Model
Germani, D., Sonzogni, B., & Cecconi, F. (2023) · Springer proceedings in complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_21
Prosocial Decision-Making by Groups and Individuals: A Social-Psychological Approach
Harrell, A. (2023) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_15
The effect of incentives on the final response rate
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/fb761a19-en
Eliciting expert knowledge: Methods and challenges
Baret, A., Révai, N., Rowe, G., & Bolger, F. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/4b900c5c-en
Rater values selection on consistency facets for eight evaluation campaigns by NIST and LNE
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/0f08767a-en
Share of questions that receive more than 20% of uncertain ratings in different assessments
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/ddf4ae3c-en
Project goals, constraints and next steps
Elliott, S. W. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/e0f758b7-en
Rater values selection on validity facets for eight evaluation campaigns by NIST and LNE
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/837e11ea-en
AI capability expert ratings, by task
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/a5af2dd6-en
Experts' ratings of AI and GPT-3.5 performance on PISA science questions
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/968ed16a-en
A framework for characterising evaluation instruments of AI performance
Cohn, A. G., & Hernández‐Orallo, J. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/f585066f-en
Executive summary
OECD (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/924ba903-en
Foreword
OECD (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/62ff4d1d-en
AI capability expert ratings and their comparison to the ratings of the first study
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/90706fb4-en
Towards a synthesis of language capability in humans and AI
Graham, Y. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/436a79da-en
AI numeracy performance in 2016 and 2021, by question difficulty
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/ec49abf8-en
Rater value selection on validity facets
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/9bf0a992-en
Raters value selection on fairness facets
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/4aec8859-en
Raters value selection on consistency facets
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/5aee1acd-en
Distribution of expert ratings of AI and robotics performance on entire task
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/4cdef7cc-en
Occupational tests
Staneva, M., Rüschoff, B., & Ackerman, P. L. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/70bf5ebf-en
Average AI and robotics performance, by expert and expertise
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/36f314ec-en
Assessing AI capabilities with education tests
Staneva, M., Baret, A., Aso-Mollar, Á., Blass, J. A., Carrión, S., Conitzer, V., Ulises Cortés, A., Dasigi, P., de Paula, A., Galindo, C., et al. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/bbdeb1e0-en
AI and robotics performance in broad capability domains, by task and expertise
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/31548862-en
Divergence in experts’ evaluations in different assessments
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/c08cd12e-en
AI and robotics performance on entire task, by task format
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/ad5d585d-en
Predicted AI performance on PISA science questions in 2022 by core experts and larger expert group, by question difficulty
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/303c00ee-en
Rater agreement across all facets
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/866a2f89-en
Rater values selection on fairness facets for eight evaluation campaigns by NIST and LNE
(2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/aaa8a5bb-en
Flexible Categorization Using Formal Concept Analysis and Dempster-Shafer TheoryPreprint
Manoorkar, K., Boersma, M., Panettiere, M., Palmigiano, A., Tzimoulis, A., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4673936
Shifting Consensus in a Biased Compromise Model
Clifton, O., Bondurant, T., Whyte, M., & Arnd Scheel, B. (2024) · SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems · doi:10.1137/23m1552346
Unraveling Post-Election Dynamics: An Analysis of Groupthink in the Wake of the 2023 Presidential Election - Insights from Atiku and Obi Supporters
Oladele, K., & Sarumi, F. R. (2023) · JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area · doi:10.31289/jppuma.v11i2.10605
Copyright Page
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.002.0003
Dedication
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.002.0004
Prologue
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.002.0006
Notes
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.002.0008
NO OTHER POSSIBILITIES THAN TRAUMATIC REALISM IN SYLIA PLATH’S ARIEL POEM (1965)
Saputra, W. A., Halizah, A. N., Azzahra, F. A., et al. (2024) · ISLLAC Journal of Intensive Studies on Language Literature Art and Culture · doi:10.17977/um006v8i12024p15-30
Résumé
OECD (2024) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/6b3eb336-fr
Avant-propos
OECD (2024) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/2713e65f-fr
Zusammenfassung
OECD (2024) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/da5313b2-de
Vorwort
OECD (2024) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/c2b59fc2-de
Vorstand, Aufsichtsrat und Task Force als Risiko bei Unternehmensentscheidungen
Bruns, W. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-44084-8_4
Evaluation of Risk Shift Between Individuals and Teams in an Operational Task
Lee, H. R., & Dorneich, M. C. (2024) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813241264203
Memoria democrática y polarización en el espacio digital. Retos y oportunidades en la escuela
Seisdedos, M. A. R. (2024) · Política y Sociedad · doi:10.5209/poso.88778 · Cited by 4
The Pandemic of Autocracy: Societal Vulnerabilities to Authoritarianism
Dunbar, E. T. (2024) · International and cultural psychology/International and cultural psychology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71122-0_1
Intrahousehold Decision Making and Fertility Choices in Rural Senegal and Uganda
Hoyweghen, K. V., den Broeck, G. V., & Maertens, M. (2024) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545701.2024.2413370
Divided Spaces and Divided Opinions
Feliciani, T. (2024) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.1161823386
Experimental Design
Smith, E. R. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170123.008
Are There Still Holes in the Swiss Cheese?—Exploring the Inherent Limits of Safety and the Human Factor
Lazányi, K. R. (2025) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78544-3_2
Démarches groupales
(2025) · Dunod eBooks · doi:10.3917/dunod.compe.2025.01.0488
Engagement modes and attitude polarization toward AI: the role of cognitive load and reliability among Chinese undergraduates
Bo, D., Ma’rof, A. A., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Rongfeng, L., & Danhe, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1596330
Factors motivating the aggravated rape of a minor: we should foster awareness of the sexual boundaries of minorsPreprint
Ma, M., & Liao, R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6816283/v1
Gender and Pregnancy Discrimination in the Selection Process. Does It (Still) Exist?
Bria, M., Cociş, A. M., Trif, S., et al. (2025) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70039
YÖNETİM, KAMU SAĞLIĞI VE FİNANS: COVID-19 AŞI KAMPANYALARINI ANLAMAK İÇİN TEORİK BİR ÇERÇEVE
Uçkaç, B. C. (2025) · Akademik Hassasiyetler · doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1660050
Interbrain Synchrony Mitigates Extremism Within Echo Chambers
Sobeh, A., Vakrat, T. M., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. (2025) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.70083
The lightning rod effect: salvation and damnation in polarised brands
Alves, A. P. C. C., & Strehlau, V. I. (2025) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-08-2025-6237
I'll take the money and you can have the short commute: a study of household level work and travel decisions
O’Neill, V., Hess, S., & Campbell, D. (2012) · Transportation Research Board 91st Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board
Comparison between interpersonal and intergroup behaviors and perceptions in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game.
Yoshida, F., & Ohmoto, S. (1985) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.56.86
Zwei Seiten einer Medaille : Effekte transformationaler Führung auf Teaminnovation
Eisenbeiß, S. A. (2008)
The effects of scale and information distribution on group decision-making processes and outcomes
Landis, M. J. (2006) · doi:10.32469/10355/4377
The effects of interpersonal communication style on task performance and well being
Taylor, H. H. (2007) · Bucks New University Repository (Bucks New University) · Cited by 8
An Experimental Investigation of Select Executive Remunerative Factors in the "Pay-For-Performance" Paradigm
Fleming, A. S. (2005) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Selective communication of political informationPreprint
Ekstrom, P. D., & Lai, C. K. (2018) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/rj23h
How group deliberation shapes distributional preferences: An experimental analysis
Ferreira, J. V. S., Schokkaert, E., & Tarroux, B. (2026) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2026.102893
Framing Effects in Informal Communication Networks and the Problem of Embeddedness
Dokshin, F. A., & Parker, S. (2026) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/01902725261418323
5 Twelve Mechanisms of Radicalization to Terrorism
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111444529-007
Polarising alone? The relationship between social contact and affective polarisation in Belgium and the UK
Bernaerts, K., & Junius, N. (2026) · Acta Politica · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031632/v1
Les différences culturelles dans l'usage de Facebook entre les Etats-Unis et la France
Brown, G. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5a149c29zb947z4037z8e72z2b5b8f0ca18d
Amélioration de l’expérience d’achat en ligne et de la satisfaction client par le recours au nudge
Lahna, L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f33c4d29z44f2z428czacfaz9659a58d76ca
Effects of controversial contexts on opinion changes through discussion and evaluation of decisions: A group decision experiment regarding the issue of removed soil in Fukushima
Souma, Y., Shibata, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Cui, Q., Nakazawa, T., Tatsumi, T., Arima, Y., & Ohnuma, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346574
La fabrique de la décision : Rois et conseillers en Grèce ancienne (IVe s. - milieu du IIe s. av. J.-C.)
Chausserie-Laprée, H. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e82d98ecz8d49z4742z8be2za6965cb6981b
Accompagnement psychosocial des cédants : le cas des exploitations agricoles familiales
Lataste, D. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8619de88z3d3fz4f16zaff0z75ebf08761b6
The positive role of self-control in uncivil online comment environments: an experimental study on commenting tendencies and hostility
Xie, F., Zhao, G., & Zeng, D. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09373-2
Neutral Voice in Echo Chambers: Effects of AI Participation on Group Polarization and Social Perception
Liao, Y.-C., & Chen, Y. Y. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798386
Parasocial learning theory: a social-cognitive framework for mediated criminological influence, with applications to nihilistic violent extremism and dark fandoms
Aris, K. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression · doi:10.1080/19434472.2026.2660704
Strategic Risk-Taking: Information Systems Design and the Formation and Enactment of Perceived Risk under Strategic ParadoxPreprint
Seibert, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6618618
Behind the Mask: Investigating the Influence of Pseudonymity on Polarization Dynamics in Social Virtual Reality
Tölle, L., Rose, R., & Trier, M. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30816-0_10
The Impact of AI Chat Behavior on Consensus Building
Ito, K., & Ujiie, K. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30860-3_27
Collusion Relations and their Applications to Balance Theory
Joinet, J.-B., & Olarte, C. A. (2026) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.449.10
Collective Information Processing in the Public Information Environment
Kashima, Y., Fay, N., Ransom, K., Kuek, J. C., & Pucci, V. (2025) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17478-9_14
The role of group composition in collaborative foresight
Wiener, M., Boer, H., & Gattringer, R. (2026) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124836
Multi model deliberation improves the stability of automated scoring by large language models across genres and assessment contextsPreprint
ZHENG, X., Chen, B., Chen, Y., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10367743/v1
Topic-relevant experience divides opinion before discussion: a case-method pilot in AI-ethics education
Shao, T. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01321-x
“We Know What We Don't Know” a reflexive synthesis of research and lay knowledge regarding group decision-making in mountaineering
Bergauer, A. E., Wolf, S. A., Schittenhelm, A., et al. (2026) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103257
How Experience of Online Group Polarization Relates to University Students’ Value-Related Judgments and Choices: The Parallel Mediating Roles of Cognitive Dissonance and Emotional Contagion
何绍森, Li, J., Yang, R., Wu, Z., & Lu, H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091697
Measuring, Representing, and Explaining Attitude-Like Systems in Large Language Model Agents: A Doctoral Research Proposal
Cheng, A., Tong, S., & Peng, K. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-6916-7_19
Provisions of a Strategic Decision Protocol
Sutherland, J. W. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0953-3_7

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks