Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,102

Framing Effects in Group Investment Decision Making: Role of Group Polarization
Cheng, P.-Y., & Chiou, W. (2008) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.102.1.283-292 · Cited by 46
Exploring the Processes Underlying Within-Group Homogeneity
Mason, C. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406288972 · Cited by 41
Improving Attitudes toward Retarded Children by Using Group Discussion
Gottlieb, J. (1980) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440298004700204 · Cited by 41
Resolve, Time, and Risk
Kertzer, J. D. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000424 · Cited by 40
Nonlinear societal change: The perspective of dynamical systems
Nowak, A. K., & Vallacher, R. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12271 · Cited by 41
Developmental and contextual aspects of children's language attitudes
Giles, H., Harrison, C., Creber, C., et al. (1983) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(83)90011-3 · Cited by 40
Attitudes of young people toward driving after smoking cannabis or after drinking alcohol
Danton, K., Misselke, L., Bacon, R., et al. (2003) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/001789690306200106 · Cited by 39
Bots and Computational Propaganda: Automation for Communication and Control
Woolley, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.006 · Cited by 41
Paths to market for stationary solid oxide fuel cells: Expert elicitation and a cost of electricity model
Whiston, M. M., Azevedo, I. L., Litster, S., et al. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117641 · Cited by 39
Persuasive arguments theory: a test of assumptions
Meyers, R. (1989) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00189.x · Cited by 39
Construct validity of a competitive reaction-time aggression paradigm
Giancola, P. R., & Zeichner, A. (1995) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3 · Cited by 200
Crowdsourcing content creation in the classroom
Hills, T. T. (2015) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-015-9089-2 · Cited by 38
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.011 · Cited by 39
The Effects of Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Group Interaction on Group Processes
Taylor, J., & Macdonald, J. B. (2002) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08939302020003004 · Cited by 38
Management of poor performance: A comparison of manager, group member, and group disciplinary decisions.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Judge, T. A., Sparrowe, R. T., Kraimer, M. L., & Franz, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.835 · Cited by 38
Group Polarization in Board Decisions About CEO Compensation
Zhu, D. H. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0848 · Cited by 38
Predicting Attitude Extremity: The Interactive Effects of Schema Development and the Need to Evaluate and Their Mediation by Evaluative Integration
Federico, C. M. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204263787 · Cited by 38
What Makes Foreign Policy Teams Tick: Explaining Variation in Group Performance at Geopolitical Forecasting
Horowitz, M. C., Stewart, B., Tingley, D. H., Bishop, M., Samotin, L. R., Roberts, M. E., Chang, W., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/704437 · Cited by 40
Psychology and the Study of Political Executives
Hermann, M. G., & Kaarbo, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198809296.013.3 · Cited by 37
Overcoming social awareness in computer-supported groups
Weisband, S. P. (1993) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00805695 · Cited by 37
Emotional Variation in Work Groups
Tiedens, L. Z., Sutton, R. I., & Fong, C. T. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819568.010 · Cited by 37
Accountability and Need for Cognition Effects on Contrast, Halo, and Accuracy in Performance Ratings
Palmer, J. K., & Feldman, J. M. (2005) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.3200/jrlp.139.2.119-138 · Cited by 36
Majority Influence Process in Group Judgment: Test of the Social Judgment Scheme Model in a Group Polarization Context
Ohtsubo, Y., Masuchi, A., & Nakanishi, D. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005003005 · Cited by 37
The origins and function of the reference point in risky group decision making the case of the Cuban missile crisis
Whyte, G., & Levi, A. S. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070403 · Cited by 35
Risky Decision Making in Mixed-Gender Teams
Karakowsky, L., & Elangovan, A. R. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200105 · Cited by 37
CEO duality and tax avoidance: Empirical evidence from Greece
Kolias, G. D., & Koumanakos, E. (2022) · Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation · doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100465 · Cited by 42
AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online Debates
Govers, J., Velloso, E., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642322 · Cited by 49
Beyond emotional similarity: The role of situation-specific motives.
Goldenberg, A., García, D., Halperin, E., Zaki, J., Kong, D., Golarai, G., & Gross, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000625 · Cited by 35
ConsensUs
Liu, W., Xiao, S., Browne, J., Yang, M. Y., & Dow, S. P. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3159649 · Cited by 34
Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence
Meyers, R. A. (1989) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758909390254 · Cited by 34
A Self-Categorization Theory Perspective on Adolescent Boys’ Sexual Bullying of Girls
Page, E., Shute, R. H., & McLachlan, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260514535096 · Cited by 33
Democratic Creative Destruction? The Effect of a Changing Media Landscape on Democracy
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.008 · Cited by 35
Pragmatism as Problem Solving
Prasad, M. (2021) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023121993991 · Cited by 33
Cooperation and the Use of Coercion by Groups and Individuals
Lindskold, S., McElwain, D. C., & Wayner, M. (1977) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200277702100309 · Cited by 33
Investigators under influence: How social norms activate goal-directed processing of criminal evidence
Ask, K., Granhag, P. A., & Rebelius, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1724 · Cited by 33
Rater confidence and social influence in performance appraisals.
Zalesny, M. D. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.3.274 · Cited by 33
Deliberation and polarization: a multi-disciplinary review
Caluwaerts, D., Bernaerts, K., Kesberg, R., Smets, L., & Spruyt, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1127372 · Cited by 44
Partisan underestimation of the polarizing influence of group discussion
Keating, J., Leaf Van Boven, A., & Judd, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.002 · Cited by 33
Preferences and Social Influence
Fershtman, C., & Segal, U. (2018) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20160190 · Cited by 32
Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge
Currin, C. B., Vera, S. V., & Khaledi‐Nasab, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12494-w · Cited by 36
Group Marginalization
Betts, K. R., & Hinsz, V. B. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313497999 · Cited by 35
Unpacking Affective Forecasting and Its Ties to Project Work In Organizations
Dane, E., & George, J. M. (2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0244 · Cited by 34
Group decision making at a multialternative task: Extremity, interfaction distance, pluralities, and issue importance
Kerr, N. L. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90046-a · Cited by 32
Self-, other-, and ideal-judgments of risk and caution as a function of the five-factor model of personality
Olson, B. D., & Suls, J. M. (2000) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00105-1 · Cited by 32
Predicting Joint Choice Using Individual Data
Aribarg, A., Arora, N., & Kang, M. Y. (2009) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0490 · Cited by 31
Are you better off alone? Mitigating the underperformance of engineering teams during conceptual design through adaptive process management
Gyory, J. T., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2018) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-018-00303-3 · Cited by 31
Predictive accuracy study: comparing a statistical model to clinicians’ estimates of outcomes after coronary bypass surgery
Ivanov, J., Borger, M. A., David, T. E., Cohen, G. N., Walton, N. A., & Naylor, C. D. (2000) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01387-4 · Cited by 31
Attitude Comparison: Is There Ever a Bandwagon Effect?1
Myers, D. G., Wojcicki, S. B., & Aardema, B. S. (1977) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb00758.x · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Group Epistemology and Structural Factors in Online Group Polarization
Boyd, K. M. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.47 · Cited by 30
Changing minds via collective action: Exposure to the 2017 Women’s March predicts decrease in (some) men’s gender system justification over time
Saguy, T., & Szekeres, H. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217750475 · Cited by 30
Mapping Contentious Collective Emotions in a Populist Democracy: Duterte's Push for Philippine Federalism
Montiel, C. J., & Uyheng, J. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12648 · Cited by 33
Dissensions et consensus
Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (2010) · doi:10.1522/030148955 · Cited by 33
Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., Taylor, N. J., & Polito, A. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665464 · Cited by 30
Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy
Peters, U. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12194 · Cited by 32
Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology
Kameda, T., Wisdom, T. N., Toyokawa, W., & Inukai, K. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212451863 · Cited by 31
Social psychology of Making Poverty History: Motivating anti-poverty action in Australia
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2010) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050060903447095 · Cited by 29
Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?
Kee, F., Owen, T., & Leathem, R. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2005.044917 · Cited by 29
Bureaucratic-Organizational Politics and Information Processing in a Developing State
Vertzberger, Y. Y. I. (1984) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2600398 · Cited by 29
Social Information Processing and Group-Induced Shifts in Responses to Task Design
Bateman, T. S., Griffin, R. W., & Rubinstein, D. (1987) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960118701200107 · Cited by 29
The Etiology of Radicalization
Borum, R. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118923986.ch1 · Cited by 30
Nice and Nasty: The Formation of Prosocial and Hostile Social Movements
Thomas, E. F., Smith, L. G. E., McGarty, C., & Postmes, T. (2010) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 28
Expert elicitation on paths to advance fuel cell electric vehicles
Whiston, M. M., Azevedo, I. L., Litster, S., Samaras, C., Whitefoot, K. S., & Whitacre, J. F. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112671 · Cited by 27
Many heads are more utilitarian than one
Keshmirian, A., Deroy, O. D., & Bahrami, B. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104965 · Cited by 31
Voting participation and engagement in blockchain-based fan tokens
Ante, L., Saggu, A., Schellinger, B., & Wazinski, F.-P. (2024) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-024-00709-z · Cited by 34
Social Influence and Group Dynamics
Nowak, A. K., Vallacher, R. R., & Miller, M. E. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0516 · Cited by 28
The effects of recursive communication dynamics on belief updating
Pescetelli, N., & Yeung, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0025 · Cited by 33
The effect of computer‐mediated communication on conformity vs. nonconformity: An impression management perspective
Schlosser, A. E. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.005 · Cited by 27
Held captive in the office: an investigation into long working hours among Korean employees
Zhang, L., & Seo, J. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1192053 · Cited by 27
Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors
Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. P. (2009) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160802477757 · Cited by 33
Revising Images of Public Punitiveness: Sentencing by Lay and Professional English Magistrates
Diamond, S. S. (1990) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1086/492290 · Cited by 27
Group vs individual equity judgments: Is there a polarization effect?
Greenberg, J. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(79)90012-x · Cited by 27
Among friends: the role of academic-preparedness diversity in individual performance within a small-group STEM learning environment
Micari, M., Winkle, Z. V., & Pazos, P. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1218091 · Cited by 26
Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe
Fukuyama, F., & Grotto, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.010 · Cited by 28
Simulating the coordination of individual economic decisions
Nowak, A. K., Kuś, M., Urbaniak, J., & Zarycki, T. (2000) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(00)00397-6 · Cited by 26
Computer-mediated and face-to-face groups: who makes riskier decisions?
Valacich, J. S., Sarker, S., Pratt, J., & Groomer, M. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.993870 · Cited by 26
An Experimental Investigation of the Positive and Negative Effects of Mutual Observation
Bloomfield, R. J., & Hales, J. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.331 · Cited by 26
Group decision-making in the shadow of disagreement
Eliaz, K., Debraj Ray, B., & Razin, R. (2005) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.008 · Cited by 26
The effects of intergroup comparison on the polarization of opinions
Skinner, M., & Stephenson, G. M. (1981) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02684426 · Cited by 26
Is a Team Different from the Sum of its Parts? Evidence from Mutual Fund ManagersPreprint
Baer, M., Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1089207 · Cited by 26
Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation
Hahn, U., Merdes, C. J., & von Sydow, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294815 · Cited by 30
Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions
Mateus, R. J. G., Costa, J. C. B. E., & Matos, P. V. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-016-9501-y · Cited by 25
Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making
Bixter, M. T., Trimber, E. M., & Luhmann, C. C. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z · Cited by 25
Modeling Group Behavior to Study Innovation Diffusion Based on Cognition and Network: An Analysis for Garbage Classification System in Shanghai, China
Zheng, J., Xu, M., Cai, M., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16183349 · Cited by 25
Reaching Consensus in Polarized Moral Debates
Navajas, J., Heduan, F. Á., Garrido, J. M., Gonzalez, P. A., Garbulsky, G., Dan Ariely, C., & Sigman, M. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.018 · Cited by 26
A Radical Vision of Radicalism: Political Cynicism, not Incrementally Stronger Partisan Positions, Explains Political Radicalization
Hiel, A. V., Assche, J. V., Haesevoets, T., Cremer, D. D., & Hodson, G. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12785 · Cited by 30
The Role of the Human Operator in Image-Based Airport Security Technologies
Graves, I., Butavicius, M., MacLeod, V., Heyer, R., Parsons, K., Kuester, N., McCormac, A., Jacques, P., & Johnson, R. (2011) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17764-4_5 · Cited by 16
Computer-mediated group influence on ethical behavior
Leonard, L. N. K., & Haines, R. P. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.010 · Cited by 25
Online Political Advertising in the United States
Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.007 · Cited by 26
A Field Study of Social Information Processing Mean Differences and Variance Differences
Zalesny, M. D., & Farace, R. V. (1986) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00106.x · Cited by 25
Group Decision Making in the Negative Domain
Hartman, S. J., & Nelson, B. H. (1996) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601196212003 · Cited by 26
Social media insights into spatio-temporal emotional responses to COVID-19 crisis
Wang, S., Liang, C., Gao, Y., Ye, Y., Qiu, J., Tao, C., & Wang, H. (2024) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103174 · Cited by 25
Fake News und Desinformation
Hohlfeld, R., Harnischmacher, M., Heinke, E., Lehner, L. S., Sengl, M., & Verlagsgesellschaft, N. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748901334 · Cited by 34
Managing minority opinions in large-scale group decision making based on community detection and group polarization
Wu, T., Zuheros, C., Liu, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108337 · Cited by 24
Individual Versus Group Decision Making: Social Comparison in Goals for Individual Task Performance
Hinsz, V. B. (1991) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00454.x · Cited by 24
The influence of member heterogeneity on dyad judgment: Are two heads better than one?
Corfman, K. P., & Kahn, B. E. (1995) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00994037 · Cited by 24
Social demographic and attitudinal determinants of consumer acceptance of food irradiation
Sápp, S. G., Harrod, W. J., & Zhao, L. (1995) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/1520-6297(199503/04)11:2 · Cited by 24
Smile and Punishment
Forgas, J. P., O’Connor, K. V., & Morris, S. L. (1983) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167283094008 · Cited by 23
Expanding the Persuasive Arguments Explanation of the Polarity Shift: A Linear Discrepancy Model
Boster, F. J., Mayer, M. E., Hunter, J. E., et al. (1980) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1980.11923801 · Cited by 24
AI and the Future of Skills, Volume 2
OECD (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/a9fe53cb-en · Cited by 43
The Critical Few: Anticonformists at the Crossroads of Minority Opinion Survival and Collapse
Jarman, M., Nowak, A. K., Borkowski, W., Serfass, D. G., Wong, A. E., & Vallacher, R. R. (2015) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.2663 · Cited by 23

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks