Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,102

Discharged in D.C.: The role of disinhibition in the behavior of insurrection group members.
Winget, J. R., & Park, E. S. (2022) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000182 · Cited by 2
Political Science and Multi-Agent Simulation: Affinities, Examples and Possibilities
Yamakage, S., Hoshiro, H., Mitsutsuji, K., et al. (2007) · Agent-based social systems · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-71307-4_19 · Cited by 2
Conflict Compromise Theory and Preference for Stages of Moral Reasoning
Muehleman, T., & Barrett, T. R. (1983) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.1015 · Cited by 2
The Tragedy of Democratic Decision Making
Fiedler, J. H. K. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315717104-20 · Cited by 2
Nonconformist tendencies related to risky choices in female methamphetamine abstainers
Wei, S., Liu, Q., Harrington, M. G., Sun, J., Yu, H., Han, J., Hao, M., Wu, H., & Liu, X. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2019.1608554 · Cited by 2
SEM-Tree hybrid models in the preferences analysis of the members of Polish households
Sagan, A., & Łapczyński, M. (2020) · Advances in Data Analysis and Classification · doi:10.1007/s11634-020-00414-7 · Cited by 2
Pension Trustee Decision Making
Ayton, P., Clacher, I., Strong, C., Thoma, & Weiss‐Cohen, L. (2021) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 2
Determining The Social and Psychological Reasons for The Emergence of Parkour and Free Running - An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
Wallace, M. (2014) · University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) · Cited by 1
Managerial intervention in disputes: the role of cognitive biases and heuristics
Elangovan, A. R. (2002) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730210445829 · Cited by 4
The mandate phenomenon.
Clark, R. D., & SECHREST, L. B. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.34.6.1057 · Cited by 2
Co-Operative Group versus Individual Evaluations of Instruction in Professional In-Service Training
Townsend, M. A. R., & Moore, D. W. (1994) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/000494419403800204 · Cited by 2
The Influence of Group Discussions on Children's Moral Decisions
Berndt, T. J. (1984) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-479280-7.50012-9 · Cited by 2
Leader-member exchange and attitudes:a theoretical and empirical integration
Lee, A. (2016) · Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) · doi:10.48780/publications.aston.ac.uk.00028546 · Cited by 2
How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forumPreprint
Oswald, L., & Bright, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06516 · Cited by 2
Learning Resources
Adams, B. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-10435-9_10 · Cited by 2
What's in the Box? Punishment and Insanity in the Canadian Jury Deliberation Room
Yamamoto, S. (2019) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13499 · Cited by 2
Beyond Emotional Similarity: The Role of Situation-Specific MotivesPreprint
Goldenberg, A., García, D., Halperin, E., Zaki, J., Zhang, D., Golarai, G., & Gross, J. J. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u3tbv · Cited by 6
Social contagion
Riggio, R. E., & Riggio, C. R. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91497-0.00192-2 · Cited by 2
Should Analysts Act Alone?Preprint
Bloomfield, R. J., & Hales, J. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.941494 · Cited by 2
Mandevillian Intelligence
Smart, P. R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801764.003.0013 · Cited by 1
Public Sphere Distortion in the Age of Internet Giants
Sabra, I., & Elkadi, M. (2022) · Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.54873/jolets.v2i1.70 · Cited by 1
Grupla Psikolojik Danışma El Kitabı
Özen, Y. (2024) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.3104 · Cited by 1
Making sense of sense-making in child protection: insights from a study exploring social workers’ practice of personal reflexivity in a statutory setting
Cavener, J. (2024) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2024.2356890 · Cited by 1
A dual-threshold approach for the dynamics of bi-polarization in signed networks with communities
Liu, S., Guo, S., Zheng, H., Fu, W., Xia, H., & Lu, X. B. (2024) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115735 · Cited by 1
Confirmation Bias in Decision-making: Implications in Finance, Business, and Digital Media
Chao, A. Z. (2024) · Highlights in Business Economics and Management · doi:10.54097/a9e6e764 · Cited by 1
The Fake News and Polarization Landscape: Scoping Review of Fake News Research and its Link with Attitude Polarization
Lana-Blond, R., & García-Saiz, M. (2025) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2025.10010 · Cited by 1
Task Allocation and Role Distribution in Humane-AI Ecosystems
Nowak, A., Ziembowicz, K., Pitt, J. V., Biesaga, M., Boros, A., Bartkowski, W., Lewandowska, W. M., Borkowski, W., & Mertzani, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61050-9_24-1 · Cited by 1
Ethnic Experience and Politics of Ethnicity in a Globalized Environment
Kowalski, E. (2013) · European Education · doi:10.2753/eue1056-4934450104 · Cited by 1
Multi-agent Modeling and Simulation on Group Polarization Behavior in Web 2.0
Du, S., & Qi, J. (2014) · Journal of Networks · doi:10.4304/jnw.9.8.2003-2012 · Cited by 1
What do Gambling and Advice-Giving have in Common?
Sanders, G. S. (1980) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616728062018 · Cited by 1
Arguments, Conflicts, and Decisions
Fabio Paglieri, A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14081-0_7 · Cited by 1
How to Develop and Promote Leadership from the Top
Heras, M. L., & Chinchilla, N. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230295087_11 · Cited by 1
Examinations of Factors Which Produce a Spatial Clustering of Opinions in Dynamic Social Impact Theory
Kosugi, K. E., FUJISAWA, T., Mizutani, S., et al. (2001) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.41.16 · Cited by 1
Sticks and Stones
Valeri, R. M., & Borgeson, K. (2016) · Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9938-0.ch006 · Cited by 1
Examining the, Ideological, Sociopolitical, and Contextual Factors Underlying the Appeal of Extremism
Williams, G.-R., Bernard, M. L., & Jeffers, R. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_25 · Cited by 1
Representing Mute Interests
Goodin, R. E. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.003.0011 · Cited by 1
Peer review in design: Understanding the impact of collaboration on the review process and student perception
Mandala, M. (2016) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Opinion Network Modeling and Experiment
Gabbay, M. (2019) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10892-2_18 · Cited by 1
Context and Match Between Context and Framework Components
Paletz, S. B. F., Auxier, B. E., & Golonka, E. (2019) · SpringerBriefs in complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16413-3_5 · Cited by 1
Social influence in committee deliberation
Fershtman, C., & Segal, U. (2023) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-023-09949-5 · Cited by 1
Digital Media in Politics
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.009 · Cited by 1
Group‐deliberative competences and group knowledge
Broncano‐Berrocal, F., & Barba, M. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12217 · Cited by 1
Personality Traits and Whistleblowing on Twitter: The Moderating Roles of Moral Identity and Politics Perceptions
Chen, F., & Liu, S. (2022) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v18n1p117 · Cited by 1
AI direct tests: LNE and NIST evaluations
Messina, E. R., Avrin, G., & Ribeiro, S. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/982e32ab-en · Cited by 1
Assessing AI capabilities on occupational tests
Kalamova, M. (2023) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/4bd0d136-en · Cited by 1
How article category in Wikipedia determines the heterogeneity of its editors
Oeberst, A., & Ridderbecks, T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50448-y · Cited by 1
Impact of Confirmation Bias on Group Dynamics
Fernandes, K., Davison, D. P., & Wang, D. (2024) · Springer proceedings in complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64193-0_7 · Cited by 1
Status quo bias and poaching avoidance in selecting strategic alliance partners
Ratchford, M., Chakravarti, D., & Sinha, A. R. (2025) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1017/eec.2025.4
A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective
Fu, W., Zhu, R., Liu, S., Lu, X. B., & Li, B. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 · Cited by 2
Confirmation bias and the plausible distribution of evidence
Hahn, U. (2025) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-025-00360-x · Cited by 1
Aggression In Response To Social Rejection: Groups Vs. Individuals
Nicholls, R. M. (2014) · CSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge) · Cited by 1
Is the willingness to take risks contagious? A comparison of immigrants and native-born in the United States
Mavletova, A., & Witte, J. C. (2016) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1119180 · Cited by 1
The Advice of Others: When and How We Benefit From It
Biele, G., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0013 · Cited by 1
The Autonomy of Preferences
Goodin, R. E. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.003.0002 · Cited by 1
The dark side of analogy-making
Petkov, G., Ivanova, D., & Psederska, E. (2019) · Cited by 1
Polarization and the Role of Digital Media
Burighel, M. (2019) · Nordicum-Mediterraneum · doi:10.33112/nm.14.2.8 · Cited by 2
Los peligros de las cámaras eco. Nota crítica de #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2020) · ENDOXA · doi:10.5944/endoxa.45.2020.22850 · Cited by 1
Simulation Games as a Framework to Conduct Scientific Experiments – The Example of Prospect Theory Research
Ćwil, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72132-9_21 · Cited by 1
Digital Media and Collective Action
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.005 · Cited by 1
Towards an Integrative Psychological Science
Tripathi, R. C., Kar, B. R., & Pande, N. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9565-0_1 · Cited by 1
Dynamical Social Psychology
Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. K. (2007) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-628-520251004 · Cited by 1
Are Groups More Pro-Self Than Individuals? Individual-Group Comparisons on Social Value Orientation and Ethical Decision Making
Shi, Z. (2014) · Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) · Cited by 1
Information Flow and Influence during Collective Search, Discussion, and Choice
Abele, S., Vaughan-Parsons, S. I., & Stasser, G. L. (2008) · MADOC (University of Mannheim) · Cited by 1
Using Stratified Item Selection to Reduce the Number of Items Rated in Standard Setting
Smith, T. N. (2011) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 1
A Monte Carlo Approach for Exploring the Generalizability of Performance Standards
Coraggio, J. T. (2008) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 1
Wealth, Social Capital and Happiness: The Case of Status Sensitive PeoplePreprint
Levy, A. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1
Mitigating escalation of commitment: An investigation of the effects of priming and decision -making setting in capital project continuation decisions
Dzuranin, A. C. (2009) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 1
Variant Conflict Management: A Conceptual Model on Varying Conflict Management Approaches within Work TeamsPreprint
Tan, R. Y. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1872913 · Cited by 1
Group Discussion, Commitment, and Penalty Shifts
Rumsey, M. G., & Castore, C. H. (1980) · Small Group Behavior · doi:10.1177/104649648001100109 · Cited by 1
Changing One's Mind following Group Discussion: Sex Differences as a Function of the Diversity of Opinion
Durham, T. W. (1980) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1980.47.3.838 · Cited by 1
Effects of Skewness of Initial Choices on the Risky Shift: An Experimental Test with the Use of Consumer Stimuli
Reingen, P. H. (1977) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1977.40.1.95 · Cited by 1
Understanding Preference Revision and Concession in Joint Decisions
Bodur, H. O. (2002) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1
Contributions to the social identity approach to conformity and intragroup differentiation
Cameira, A. J. M. (2005) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · doi:10.34626/hshe-ff19 · Cited by 1
Increased risk of multi-crew operations: examining the effect of group polarisation on perceived invulnerability in general aviation pilots
Lee, S. Y., & Gilbey, A. (2010) · Massey Research Online (Massey University) · Cited by 1
Use of the Simulation Method Study of Jury Behavior
Bray, R. M., & Kerrt, N. L. (1979) · Cited by 1
The Deeper Layers of Learning
van der Veen, R. G. W. (2000) · New Prairie Press (Kansas State University) · Cited by 1
Accents on Trial: Accent Discrimination in U.K. and U.S. Courts
Wood, G. (2018) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 1
Group Decisions and Asymmetric Payoffs: Risky Tax Avoidance in the LaboratoryPreprint
Matthaei, E., & Kiesewetter, D. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3626982 · Cited by 1
Ideological Motives and Group Decision-MakingPreprint
Engl, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3738759 · Cited by 1
Polarization and Belief Convergence of Agents in Strongly-Connected Influence GraphsPreprint
Alvim, M. S., Amorim, B., Knight, S., Quintero, S., & Valencia, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.02703 · Cited by 3
Intensified Ideological Online Clashes with Group Political BiasPreprint
Han, X., & Hu, M. M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3692571 · Cited by 1
Homogeneity and Choice Aggregation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
von Solms, S. (2009) · ISAHP proceedings · doi:10.13033/isahp.y2009.052 · Cited by 1
Ideological Motives and Group Decision-MakingPreprint
Engl, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3744605 · Cited by 1
Internet Use and Political Polarization: A ReviewPreprint
Deri, S. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u3xyb · Cited by 2
Opposing positions, dividing interactions, and hostile affect : A multi-dimensional approach to climate change polarization in the blogosphere
van Eck, C. W. (2021) · doi:10.18174/542725 · Cited by 2
This page intentionally left blank
Gradwell, D., & Rainford, D. J. (2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b13238-23 · Cited by 1
Applications
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.004 · Cited by 1
Juror Deliberation
Kaplan, M. F., & Schersching, C. (1981) · Perspectives in law & psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_7 · Cited by 1
REFERENCES
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-573946-7.50021-2 · Cited by 1
Introduccion
Blanco, A. (1987) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.1987.10821565 · Cited by 1
Decisioni Individuali versus Decisioni Collegiali. (Individual Choices versus Group Choices)Preprint
Baffi, E., & Drago, C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4138026 · Cited by 1
Interactive crowdsourcing to fact-check politiciansPreprint
Espina-Mairal, S., Bustos, F., Solovey, G., & Navajas, J. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u9eyw · Cited by 1
Not all polarization is bad, but the US could be in trouble
Talisse, R. B. (2022) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/aai.eucxydmkn · Cited by 1
Political accountability in practice : a conversation analytic study of ministerial accountability towards the Scottish parliamentary committees
Ispas, I. A. (2010) · ERA · Cited by 1
Political Homophily and the Role of Retweeters in the French Twitter Network
Gurchani, U. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a55e3860z6c58z4523zb78fz72fe84028fba · Cited by 2
Conclusion
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.006
The influence of perceived social norms on the relationship of perceptions of sexual intent and commitment of sexual aggression
Edwards, S. R. (2011) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-2255
A Dual-Process Account of Reactions to General and Specific Events: The Roles of Counterfactual Thinking and Pre-Event Expectations
Petrocelli, J. V. (2007) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University)
Model
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.003
Issues of Information Exchange Efficiency in Long-Term Space Flights
Gushin, V., & Yusupov, A. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/21420

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks