Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,102

A journey into the unknown: Pretrial publicity and capital cases
Sandys, M. R., & Chermak, S. M. (1996) · Communication Law and Policy · doi:10.1080/10811689609368615 · Cited by 8
Small Group Research and Applied Social Psychology
Tindale, R. S., & Anderson, E. M. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_1 · Cited by 8
Group Decision-Making in the Shadow of DisagreementPreprint
Debraj Ray, B., Eliaz, K., & Razin, R. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.555959 · Cited by 8
The effects of interpersonal communication style on task performance and well being
Taylor, H. H. (2007) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 8
The effect of discussion on polarization of judgments
Isozaki, M. (1984) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.4992/psycholres1954.26.187 · Cited by 8
Examination of the Relationship Between Instructor Presence and the Learning Experience in an Asynchronous Online Environment
Kassinger, F. D. (2004) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 8
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formationPreprint
Pescetelli, N., & Yeung, N. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sjgf7 · Cited by 8
Teaching bystander action: forming identities that promote opposition to prejudice towards Muslim people
Thomas, E. F., Clark, A. J., & Pedersen, A. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09553-3 · Cited by 7
Group trust dynamics during a risky driving experience in a Tesla Model X
Momen, A., de Visser, E. J., Fraune, M. R., Madison, A., Rueben, M., Cooley, K., & Tossell, C. C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129369 · Cited by 11
Individuals, Collectives, and Individuals in Collectives: The Ineliminable Role of Dependence
Hahn, U. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231198479 · Cited by 11
Navigating Political Polarization in News Production: The Case of Italy
Splendore, S., & Piacentini, A. (2024) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990231221487 · Cited by 8
The likes that bind: Even novel opinion sharing can induce opinion‐based identification
O’Reilly, C., Maher, P. J., & Quayle, M. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12773 · Cited by 7
Information cocooning and polarization of opinions in a mobile population
Dong, J., Dai, Q., Li, H., & Yang, J. (2024) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.130322 · Cited by 7
Pakolaiskeskustelu MV-lehdessä: Merkityksellistämisen mekanismit ideologisissa puhuttelutavoissa
Tuomola, S. (2018) · Media & viestintä · doi:10.23983/mv.75324 · Cited by 7
The diversity advantage: An explanatory framework for personality traits
Pringle, T. A., & Robinson, M. D. (2024) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070241228327 · Cited by 9
Probabilistic Persuasion: A Brunswikian Theory of Argumentation
Reimer, T. O., Hertwig, R., & Sipek, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0004 · Cited by 9
The Neglect of Base Rate Data by Human Resources Managers in Employee Selection
Whyte, G., & Sue‐Chan, C. (2002) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00665.x · Cited by 7
Cultural Disposition Influences in Workgroups: A Motivational Systems Theory of Group Involvement Perspective
Hinsz, V. B., Park, E., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Ladbury, J. L. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418797443 · Cited by 7
Corporate governance reform in Japan: A behavioral view
Asaoka, D. (2020) · Corporate Board role duties and composition · doi:10.22495/cbv16i1art5 · Cited by 7
Embracing unpopular ideas: Introduction to the special section on heterodox issues in psychology.
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000072 · Cited by 8
Reducing the effects of the stereotype threat that girls perform less well than boys in mathematics: the efficacy of a mixed debate in a real classroom situation
Vallée, B., Magoutier, F., Voisin, D., & Montalan, B. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09583-x · Cited by 10
Quantitative Modeling and Analysis of Argumentation Polarization in Cyber Argumentation
Sirrianni, J., Liu, X., & Adams, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.3035228 · Cited by 7
Characteristics of a Process for Subjective Probability Elicitation
Quigley, J. M., & Walls, L. (2021) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46474-5_13 · Cited by 8
What's in the Box? Punishment and Insanity in the Canadian Jury Deliberation Room
Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689128 · Cited by 8
Social Learning: A Route to Good Cue Orders
García‐Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., Woike, J. K., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0012 · Cited by 7
Teaching Business Ethics: an Open Learning Approach
Stiles, P. G., Jameson, A., & Lord, A. (1993) · Management Education and Development · doi:10.1177/135050769302400311 · Cited by 7
Beyond compliance and acceptance: Influence outcomes as a function of norm plausibility and processing mode.
Holzhausen, K. G., & McGlynn, R. P. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.2.136 · Cited by 7
MACHIAVELLIANISM, DISCUSSION TIME, AND GROUP SHIFT
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1976) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1976.4.1.41 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Prospects and problems in modeling group decisions
Steckel, J. H., Corfman, K. P., Curry, D. J., et al. (1991) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00554128 · Cited by 7
Social epistemology and social cognition
Corlett, J. A. (1991) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691729108578609 · Cited by 7
Angewandte Sozialpsychologie
Jonas, K. W., & Lebherz, C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71633-4_15 · Cited by 7
Social comparison and persuasive arguments as determinants of group polarization
Mongeau, P. A., & Garlick, R. (1988) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824098809359812 · Cited by 7
OPPORTUNITIES LOST, CHALLENGES MET: Understanding and Applying Group Dynamics in Writing Projects
Bogert, J., & Butt, D. (1990) · The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication · doi:10.1177/108056999005300210 · Cited by 7
Studying community psychology as a community of professionals: An empirical approach.
Elias, M. J., Dalton, J. H., & Howe, G. W. (1981) · Professional Psychology · doi:10.1037//0735-7028.12.3.363 · Cited by 7
Nonverbal involvement and sex: Effects on jury decision making
Badzinski, D. M., & Pettus, A. B. (1994) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909889409365406 · Cited by 7
The Generalized Group Effect Model
Kenny, D. A. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-515620-2.50016-1 · Cited by 7
Critical Perspectives on Using Interviews and Focus Groups
Litosseliti, L. (2018) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350043466.ch-009 · Cited by 7
Who should set the Standards? Analysing Censored Arabic Content on Facebook during the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Magdy, W., Mubarak, H., & Salminen, J. O. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713150 · Cited by 6
Data sharing in learning analytics: how context and group discussion influence the individual willingness to share
Longin, L., Briceno, D., & Poquet, O. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05175-2 · Cited by 6
Analyzing group polarization through text emotion measurement and time series prediction: A comparative study across three online platforms
Wang, L., & Kim, K. (2024) · Measurement Sensors · doi:10.1016/j.measen.2024.101216 · Cited by 6
Co-evolving networks for opinion and social dynamics in agent-based models
Conrad, N. D., Vu, N. Q., & Nagel, S. (2024) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0226054 · Cited by 7
Greater than the Sum of its Parts: Exploring Social Influence of Multi-Agents
Song, T., Tan, Y., Zhu, Z., Feng, Y., & Lee, Y. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719973 · Cited by 9
The Heart Has Its Reasons: Social Rationality in Mate Choice
Lenton, A. P., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0016 · Cited by 6
Extremism, segregation and oscillatory states emerge through collective opinion dynamics in a novel agent-based model
Stokes, B. M., Jackson, S. E., Garnett, P., & Luo, J. (2022) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.2022.2124246 · Cited by 8
Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation
Boto‐García, D., Mariel, P., & Baños-Pino, J. F. (2023) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100408 · Cited by 6
Group Polarization in Board Decisions about Strategic Change: Evidence from Chinese Publicly Listed Companies (2008–2018)
Zhang, M., Ma, X., Chen, W., & Lan, H. (2023) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2022.58 · Cited by 6
Friendship and Conformity in Group Opinions: Juror Verdict Change in Mock Juries
Peoples, C. D., Sigillo, A. E., Green, M., et al. (2012) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2012.646163 · Cited by 6
Determinants of Internet Group Polarization: Effects of Anonymity and Network Crowdedness of Internet Public Sphere, and Individual & Cultural Factors
나은영, & 차유리 (2012) · 한국심리학회지 사회및성격 · doi:10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.1.007 · Cited by 6
HOMOGENEITY AND CHOICE AGGREGATION IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
von Solms, S. (2009) · Cited by 6
Collective intelligence or groupthink? Group decision making under the Japanese Companies Act
Asaoka, D. (2018) · Corporate Board role duties and composition · doi:10.22495/cbv14i2art3 · Cited by 7
Dealing with Disinformation: Evaluating the Case for Amendment of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
Hwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
Cooperate with Equals: A Simple Heuristic for Social Exchange
Johnson, T., & Smirnov, O. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0005 · Cited by 6
The accumulating effects of shared expectations
Willard, J., Madon, S., Guyll, M., Scherr, K. C., & Buller, A. A. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.874 · Cited by 6
Group Polarization on Business Decisions in Singapore
Williams, S., & Taormina, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1992.9922979 · Cited by 6
Social Comparison and Urban-Environmental Stress
Hansson, R. O., Noulles, D., & Bellovich, S. J. (1982) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616728281011 · Cited by 6
The effects of a ?distinct window? screen design on computer-mediated group decision making
Dubrovsky, V. J., Clapper, D. L., & Ullal, M. (1994) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00823362 · Cited by 5
Prospects for logical (versus data) processing facilities as strategic decision aids
Sutherland, J. W. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.23088 · Cited by 6
Shifts toward risk in adults at three age levels
Feldstein, J. H., & Washburn, D. E. (1980) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610738008258352 · Cited by 6
Response Scale Ambiguity as a Moderator of the Choice Shift
Boster, F. J., & Hale, J. L. (1989) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365089016004004 · Cited by 6
Conflict and Engagement: Collaborative Writing in One Ninth-Grade Classroom.
Dale, H. (1993) · Cited by 6
Status, Deviance, Sanctions, and Group Discussion
Wahrman, R. (1977) · Small Group Behavior · doi:10.1177/104649647700800203 · Cited by 6
Group Polarization on Corporate Boards: Theory and Evidence on Board Decisions about Acquisition Premiums, Executive Compensation, and Diversification.
Zhu, H. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 6
Group Choices in a Simulated Management Game
Muhs, W. F., & Justis, R. T. (1981) · Simulation & Games · doi:10.1177/104687818101200404 · Cited by 6
Creativity in Teams
Thompson, L., & Wilson, E. R. (2015) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0056 · Cited by 6
Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group DiscussionPreprint
Becker, J. A., Almaatouq, A., & Horvát, Á. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.07202 · Cited by 11
On the Decision-Relevance of Subjective BeliefsPreprint
Yang, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4425080 · Cited by 6
Reducing Disparity in Judicial Sentencing:- A Social-Psychological Approach
Sporer, S. L. (1982) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 6
Perceptions of Political Deviants in the US Democrat and Republican Parties
Kulibert, D., Moss, A. J., Appleby, J., & O’Brien, L. T. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13079 · Cited by 8
Team Ventures and Acquisition Exits: Are Team-Founded Ventures More Likely to be Acquired?
Soleimani, L., & Keyhani, M. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Research Journal · doi:10.1515/erj-2021-0193 · Cited by 5
Convolution of individual and group identity: self-reliance increases polarisation in basic opinion model
Quante, L., Stechemesser, A., Hödtke, D., & Levermann, A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03359-w · Cited by 5
The Wisdom of the Crowd is not a Forgone Conclusion. Effects of Self-Selection on (Collaborative) Knowledge Construction
Krebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A., & von der Beck, I. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12647 · Cited by 7
Attacks and remedies in online public opinion reversal events
Wu, Y., Ren, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Pragmatics and Society · doi:10.1075/ps.21095.wu · Cited by 5
What is Polarization in the Social Sciences? A Scoping Review of Reviews
Garzón‐Velandia, D. C., Barreto, I., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2024) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2024.27.2.11 · Cited by 10
Israeli Crisis Decision-Making in the Lebanon War: Group Madness or Individual Ambition?
Schulze, K. E. (1998) · Israel Studies · doi:10.2979/isr.1998.3.2.215 · Cited by 5
Group Polarization of Trust in Technology
Xu, J., & Montague, E. N. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571075 · Cited by 5
Polarization of Perceived Procedural Justice
Flint, D. H., Hernández‐Marrero, P., & Wielemaker, M. W. (2006) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.102.1.35-50 · Cited by 5
The diversity puzzle
Mäs, M. (2010) · Cited by 5
The Philosophy of Distributed Information
Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2016) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · doi:10.4324/9781315757544-22 · Cited by 5
Risky shifts as multi-sender signaling
Honryo, T. (2018) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2018.01.003 · Cited by 5
Individuating information influences partisan judgments
Price‐Blackshear, M. A., Sheldon, K. M., Corcoran, M. J., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12595 · Cited by 5
Polarización como impermeabilidad: cuando las razones ajenas no importan
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2019) · Cinta de moebio · doi:10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300295 · Cited by 4
Dissecting Discrimination
Villiger, D. (2021) · Entscheidungs- und Organisationstheorie · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-34569-3 · Cited by 6
Divergent and Convergent Creativity
Kenworthy, J. B., Paulus, P. B., Minai, A. A., & Doboli, S. (2021) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77198-0_4 · Cited by 5
Algoritmos en el estrado, ¿realmente los aceptamos? Percepciones del uso de la inteligencia artificial en la toma de decisiones jurídico-penales.
Moreno, Á. M. M. (2021) · IUS ET SCIENTIA · doi:10.12795/ietscientia.2021.i02.05 · Cited by 5
A Latent Class Approach to Understanding Associations between Sports Participation, Substance Use, Dismissive Attitudes, and Sexual Violence Perpetration among High School Athletes
Ingram, K. M., Basile, K. C., Leemis, R. W., Espelage, D. L., & Valido, A. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211067005 · Cited by 5
Managing attention: more mindful team decision-making
Bartelt, V. L., & Dennis, A. R. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2118627 · Cited by 5
Outlier detection using flexible categorization and interrogative agendas
Boersma, M., Manoorkar, K., Palmigiano, A., Panettiere, M., Tzimoulis, A., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114196 · Cited by 7
Processos sociais de vitimização prisional
de Almeida, O. L., & Paes‐Machado, E. (2013) · Tempo Social · doi:10.1590/s0103-20702013000100013 · Cited by 5
Pot la psicologia rescatar-se a si mateixa?. Incentius, biaix i replicabilitat
Fernando, B., César, P. L. J., & Vadillo, M. A. (2018) · Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia · doi:10.7203/anuari.psicologia.18.2.231 · Cited by 5
Controversy About a High-Risk and Innovative Fetal Cardiac Intervention
Edwards, L. A., Justino, H., Morris, S. A., et al. (2018) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3595 · Cited by 5
Comparing effect coded models of choice shifts
Hale, J. L., & Boster, F. J. (1988) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824098809359821 · Cited by 5
Goldman and the foundations of social epistemology
Corlett, J. A. (1994) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/bf00733366 · Cited by 5
Separating Compensatory and Punitive Damage Award Decisions by Trial Bifurcation.
Adams, C. M. S., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2006) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9001-8 · Cited by 5
Group Polarization (Risky Shift) in LED and Leaderless Group Discussions
Lilienthal, R. A., & Hutchison, S. L. (1979) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.45.1.168 · Cited by 5
Partner Influence, Team Brainstorming, and Fraud Risk Assessment: Some Implications of SAS No. 99
Carpenter, T. D. (2004) · Cited by 5
GROUP POLARIZATION, SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
von Solms, S. (2003) · ISAHP proceedings · doi:10.13033/isahp.y2003.024 · Cited by 5
Management team analysis of crop production systems: A course in problem identification and resolution
Schweitzer, L. E. (1986) · Journal of Agronomic Education · doi:10.2134/jae1986.0034 · Cited by 5
How Effective Altruism Can Help Psychologists Maximize Their ImpactPreprint
Gainsburg, I., Pauer, S., Abboub, N., Aloyo, E., Mourrat, J.-C., & Cristià, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8dw59 · Cited by 5
Boardroom Dissent: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda
Eirola, A., Bezemer, P., & Reinhold, S. (2024) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12607 · Cited by 4
Collecting Requirements and Ideas for Architectural Group Decision-Making Based on Four Approaches
Groher, I., & Weinreich, R. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23727-5_15 · Cited by 4

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks