Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,102

Teams take the better risks
Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & Mathauschek, B. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.023 · Cited by 177
Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles
Whiston, M. M., Azevedo, I. L., Litster, S., Whitefoot, K. S., Samaras, C., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804221116 · Cited by 188
Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics
Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2014) · Cited by 176
Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts?
Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90001-4 · Cited by 167
Dimensions of novelty: a social representation approach to new foods
Bäckström, A., Pirttilä‐Backman, A., & Tuorila, H. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00005-9 · Cited by 165
Retooling Politics
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820 · Cited by 227
What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias?
Peters, U. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1 · Cited by 236
Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, polarization, and clustering as order parameters of social systems
Latané, B., Nowak, A. K., & Liu, J. H.-F. (1994) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830390102 · Cited by 159
Implicit Bias and Accountability Systems: What Must Organizations Do to Prevent Discrimination?
Tetlock, P. E., & Mitchell, G. (2009) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.002 · Cited by 164
Sociocognitive Analysis of Group Decision Making among Consumers
Ward, J. C., & Reingen, P. H. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208555 · Cited by 156
Is a Team Different From the Sum of Its Parts? Evidence from Mutual Fund Managers
(2013) · Cited by 148
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. D. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(75)90045-1 · Cited by 153
When Subordinates Become IT Contractors: Persistent Managerial Expectations in IT Outsourcing
Ho, V. T., Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.1.66.14764 · Cited by 153
ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00226.x · Cited by 147
Groupthink Reconsidered
Whyte, G. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279001 · Cited by 149
Depolarization of attitudes in groups.
Vinokur, A. D., & Burnstein, E. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.872 · Cited by 151
Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups
Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.4.451 · Cited by 144
Burnout and Intention to Leave Among Mental Health-Care Professionals: A Social Psychological Approach
Geurts, S. A. E., Schaufeli, W. B., & JONGE, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1998.17.3.341 · Cited by 142
Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums
Zhu, D. H. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2039 · Cited by 141
ExpertLens: A system for eliciting opinions from a large pool of non-collocated experts with diverse knowledge
Dalal, S. R., Khodyakov, D., Srinivasan, R., Straus, S. G., & Adams, J. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.021 · Cited by 138
Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization.
Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.12.1424 · Cited by 140
Information Exchange and Use in GSS and Verbal Group Decision Making: Effects of Minority Influence
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1997) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1997.11518175 · Cited by 140
Attitude polarization: Effects of group membership.
Mackie, D., & Cooper, J. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.575 · Cited by 139
Exploration versus exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions
Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J., Argote, L., Mønster, D., Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2380 · Cited by 142
Deliberation and Attitude Polarization
Wojcieszak, M. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01568.x · Cited by 153
International norm polarization: sexuality as a subject of human rights protection
Symons, J., & Altman, D. (2015) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971914000384 · Cited by 142
The Effect of Multiple Anchors on Anchoring in Individual and Group Judgment
Whyte, G., & Sebenius, J. K. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2674 · Cited by 134
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes
Whyte, G. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2761 · Cited by 136
Embracing informed learner self-assessment during debriefing: the art of plus-delta
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Epps, C. A., Kolbe, M., Meguerdichian, M. J., & Grant, V. J. (2021) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-021-00173-1 · Cited by 132
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization
Mäs, M., Flache, A., Takács, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0767 · Cited by 127
Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change
Levitan, L. C., & Verhulst, B. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9312-x · Cited by 129
Measuring the Influence of Individual Preference Structures in Group Decision Making
Arora, N., & Allenby, G. M. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600406 · Cited by 127
Eliciting knowledge for analytical representation
Fischhoff, B. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.31052 · Cited by 126
Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion
Vinokur, A. D., & Burnstein, E. (1978) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080306 · Cited by 127
Political Polarization as a Social Movement Outcome
McVeigh, R., Cunningham, D., & Farrell, J. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414555885 · Cited by 123
Replicating Studies in Which Samples of Participants Respond to Samples of Stimuli
Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614564879 · Cited by 133
Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making
MacCoun, R. J. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.244.4908.1046 · Cited by 117
Social signals of safety and risk confer utility and have asymmetric effects on observers' choices
Chung, D., Christopoulos, G. I., King‐Casas, B., Ball, S. B., & Chiu, P. H. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4022 · Cited by 123
Online Hate Speech
Siegel, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.005 · Cited by 123
Jurors' Reactions to Child Witnesses
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., & Haith, M. M. (1984) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01098.x · Cited by 118
"Social" Cognition and Social Cognition: From the Subjective to the Intersubjective
Ickes, W., & Gonzalez, R. (1994) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496494252008 · Cited by 115
I hate what you love: brand polarization and negativity towards brands as an opportunity for brand management
Ramírez, S. A. O., Veloutsou, C. A., & Morgan‐Thomas, A. (2019) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-03-2018-1811 · Cited by 125
Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self: Hierarchical Ordering of the Tripartite Self
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & O’Mara, E. M. (2011) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0059-0 · Cited by 127
Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency.
Whyte, G. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.408 · Cited by 110
The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation.
Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. J. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.48.2.349 · Cited by 109
Rational Polarization
Dorst, K. M. (2021) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-10469499 · Cited by 122
When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking.
Cruwys, T., Greenaway, K. H., Ferris, L. J., Rathbone, J. A., Saeri, A. K., Williams, E., Parker, S. L., Chang, M. X., Croft, N., Bingley, W., et al. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000243 · Cited by 116
The polarizing effect of group discussion.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Individual versus group behavior and the role of the decision making procedure in gift-exchange experiments
Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2007) · Empirica · doi:10.1007/s10663-006-9026-8 · Cited by 113
No Safety in Numbers
Houghton, S. M., Simon, M., Aquino, K. F., & Goldberg, C. (2000) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601100254002 · Cited by 110
Good Reasons Sell: Reason-Based Choice Among Group and Individual Investors in the Stock Market
Barber, B. M., Heath, C., & Terrance Odean, B. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.12.1636.25109 · Cited by 109
Are N+1 heads better than one?
Prather, L. J., & Middleton, K. L. (2002) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00172-x · Cited by 105
Review: Toward Realizing the Potential of Diversity in Composition of Interprofessional Health Care Teams
Mitchell, R. J., Parker, V., Giles, M., & White, N. (2009) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558709338478 · Cited by 105
Salivary Testosterone and Cortisol in a Delinquent and Violent Urban Subculture
Banks, T. W., & Dabbs, J. M. (1996) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9923028 · Cited by 103
Decision-making in teams: issues arising from two UK evaluations
Cook, K. G. G. (2001) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820120039874 · Cited by 104
Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. R. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1988 · Cited by 103
Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift.
Laughlin, P. R., & Earley, P. C. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.273 · Cited by 103
Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & van Dijk, E. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2907 · Cited by 102
Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings1
El‐Shinnawy, M., & Vinzé, A. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249394 · Cited by 104
Modeling Social Change with Cellular Automata
Nowak, A. K., & Lewenstein, M. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3_14 · Cited by 100
Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals
Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90040-x · Cited by 99
The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review
Iandoli, L., Primario, S., & Zollo, G. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 · Cited by 122
Group diversity and decision quality: Amplification and attenuation of the framing effect
Yaniv, I. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.009 · Cited by 97
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees
Schuppli, C. A., & Fraser, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2005.015057 · Cited by 97
Affective influences on individual and group judgments
Forgas, J. P. (1990) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420200506 · Cited by 94
Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation.
Komorita, S. S., & Lapworth, C. W. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.487 · Cited by 91
Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization
Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., & Beam, M. A. (2019) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255 · Cited by 113
Emergence of Polarized Ideological Opinions in Multidimensional Topic Spaces
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011012 · Cited by 104
Group vs individual information processing: The effects of outcome feedback on decision making
Tindale, R. S. (1989) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90019-8 · Cited by 90
Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy
Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (2008) · Foreign Policy Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x · Cited by 89
Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement.
Kerr, N. L. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.684 · Cited by 90
The Impact of Group Processing on Selected Audit Disclosure Decisions
Schultz, J. J., & Reckers, P. M. J. (1981) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2490876 · Cited by 89
Individual characteristics and ethical decision-making in an IT context
Haines, R. P., & Leonard, L. N. K. (2007) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635570710719025 · Cited by 88
How Deliberation Affects Stated Willingness to Pay for Mitigation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Experiment
Dietz, T. M., Stern, P. C., & Dan, A. (2009) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.85.2.329 · Cited by 87
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Modifications to the Angoff Method on Cutoff Scores and Judgment Consensus
Hurtz, G. M., & Auerbach, M. A. (2003) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164403251284 · Cited by 87
Shared Cognition in Small Groups
Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema‐Engblade, A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch1 · Cited by 87
Understanding reactions to job redesign: A quasi-experimental investigation of the moderating effects of organizational context on perceptions of performance behavior.
Morgeson, F. P., Johnson, M. D., Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Mumford, T. V. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00941.x · Cited by 98
Polarizing effects of social comparison
Myers, D. G. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90049-5 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation
Rosenberg, S. W. (2007) · Polity · doi:10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300073 · Cited by 85
Predictors and Consequences of Conversations About Health Promoting Media Messages
Dunlop, S. M., Kashima, Y., & Wakefield, M. A. (2010) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.502537 · Cited by 86
An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion.
Anderson, N. H., & Graesser, C. C. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.210 · Cited by 80
Cognitive Flexibility, Communication Strategy, and Integrative Complexity in Groups: Public versus Private Reactions to Majority and Minority Status
Gruenfeld, D. H., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Kim, P. H. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1349 · Cited by 80
Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: Effects of group decision-making mechanisms
Song, F. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.005 · Cited by 78
Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Results from Three Randomized Experiments
Farrar, C., Green, D., Green, J., Nickerson, D. W., & Shewfelt, S. (2009) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00717.x · Cited by 84
Experimental auctions, collective induction and choice shift: willingness-to-pay for rice quality in Senegal
Demont, M., Rutsaert, P., Ndour, M., Verbeke, W., Seck, P. A., & Tollens, E. F. (2012) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbs021 · Cited by 78
Group Influences on Engaging Self-Control: Children Delay Gratification and Value It More When Their In-Group Delays and Their Out-Group Doesn’t
Doebel, S., & Munakata, Y. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617747367 · Cited by 78
Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2855 · Cited by 76
Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations.
Bray, R. M., & Kerr, N. L. (1979) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01039151 · Cited by 76
Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections about Sexual Minorities
Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x · Cited by 80
Individual expectations, risk perception and preferences in relation to investment decision making
Antonides, G., & van der Sar, N. L. (1990) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(90)90005-t · Cited by 75
A Meta-Analysis of the effects of jury size.
Saks, M. J., & Marti, M. W. (1997) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024819605652 · Cited by 75
Leadership and Ethics in Work Groups
Schminke, M. J., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C. (2002) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10501102027002006 · Cited by 73
Are Two (Inexperienced) Heads Better Than One (Experienced) Head?
Poses, R. M. (1990) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390200068013 · Cited by 74
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
Pescetelli, N., & Yeung, N. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000960 · Cited by 79
Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation?
Buehler, R., Messervey, D. L., & Griffin, D. W. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.004 · Cited by 73
Cognitive Loafing, Social Conformity and Judicial Review of Agency RulemakingPreprint
Seidenfeld, M. B. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.280251 · Cited by 73
Individual versus group use of base-rate and individuating information
Argote, L., Seabright, M. A., & Dyer, L. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90026-9 · Cited by 72
Children on the Witness Stand: A Communication/Persuasion Analysis of Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-6338-5_9 · Cited by 72

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks