Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,102

Integration of Social Information by Human Groups
Granovskiy, B., Gold, J. M., Sumpter, D. J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12150 · Cited by 27
The Impact of Emotions on Juror Judgments and Decision-Making
Nunez, N. L., Estrada-Reynolds, V. C., Schweitzer, K. A., & Myers, B. P. (2016) · Advances in psychology and law · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_3 · Cited by 27
GROUP EFFECTS ON DECISION-MAKING BY BURGLARS
Cromwell, P. F., Marks, A., Olson, J. N., & Avary, D. W. (1991) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.579 · Cited by 23
Can a GSS stimulate group polarization? an empirical study
Sia, C., Tan, B., & Kwok, K.-W. (1999) · IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C · doi:10.1109/5326.760567 · Cited by 23
The Motivational Determinants of Students at Risk of Having Reading Difficulties
Sideridis, G. D., & Padeliadu, S. (2001) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193250102200502 · Cited by 23
Effects of initial tendency and real risk on choice shift
Butler, J. K., & Crino, M. D. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90052-9 · Cited by 23
Conclusion: The Challenges and Opportunities for Social Media Research
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.014 · Cited by 24
Jury Size and the Hung-Jury Paradox
Luppi, B., & Parisi, F. (2013) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/670692 · Cited by 22
Three empirical studies on the agreement of reviewers about the quality of software engineering experiments
Kitchenham, B. A., Sjøberg, D. I. K., Dybå, T., Pfahl, D., Pearl Brereton, A., Budgen, D., Höst, M., & Runeson, P. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.008 · Cited by 22
Human Nature, Communication, and Culture: Rethinking Democratic Deliberation in China and the West
Rosenberg, S. W. (2006) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780312376154_5 · Cited by 22
Frame envy in energy policy ideology: A social constructivist framework for wicked energy problems
Valentine, S. V., Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.028 · Cited by 22
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
Racism in the Jury Box: The Hispanic Defendant
Lipton, J. P. (1983) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/07399863830053002 · Cited by 22
Inducing Cooperation by Groups and Individuals: Applying Osgood's Grit Strategy
Lindskold, S., & Collins, M. G. (1978) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200277802200406 · Cited by 22
A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society
Bliuc, A., Betts, J. M., Vergani, M., Bouguettaya, A., & Cristea, M. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00125-1 · Cited by 38
The damped oscillator model (DOM) and its application in the prediction of emotion development of online public opinions
Dong, X., Lian, Y., Tang, X., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113268 · Cited by 21
Optimal sharedness of mental models for effective group performance
Boos, M. (2007) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880601170776 · Cited by 21
Role of GSS on collaborative problem-based learning: a study on knowledge externalisation
Kwok, R. C.-W., Lee, J.-N., Huynh, M. Q., et al. (2002) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000421 · Cited by 21
Extremitization of Attitudes: Does Thought- and Discussion-Induced Polarization Cumulate?
Liu, J. H.-F., & Latané, B. (1998) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/15324839851036723 · Cited by 21
Group and Individual Decision Making for Task Performance Goals: Processes in the Establishment of Goals:in Groups1
Hinsz, V. B. (1995) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02396.x · Cited by 21
Comparison of Allocations by Individuals and Interacting Groups in an Escalation of Commitment Situation1
Seibert, S. E., & Goltz, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02486.x · Cited by 21
On predicting minority influence
Clark, R. D. (1988) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180605 · Cited by 21
Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account
Sieber, J., & Ziegler, R. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219833389 · Cited by 21
Gossip: a channel for the development of personal reputation
Zinko, R., Tuchtan, C., Hunt, J., Meurs, J. A., Furner, C. P., & Prati, L. M. (2017) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-07-2016-1041 · Cited by 20
When Descriptive Norms Backfire: Attitudes Induce Undesirable Consequences during Disaster Preparation
Ozaki, T., & Nakayachi, K. (2020) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12195 · Cited by 22
Toward quality criteria for collective judgments
Hart, S. L. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90013-5 · Cited by 20
Mental Health Review Tribunals: Just or efficacious safeguards?
Peay, J. (1981) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01044761 · Cited by 20
JUDGMENT BY JURIES
Kaplan, M. F. (1977) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397240-8.50009-4 · Cited by 20
Do discussions in human-computer communities trigger group polarization? Insights from the media evocation paradigm
Xie, Z., Li, S., & Li, W. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108561 · Cited by 19
Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks
Gabbay, M., Kelly, Z. M., Reedy, J., & Gastil, J. (2018) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272518778784 · Cited by 19
Some Problems in Using Prospect Theory to Explain Strategic Management Issues
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2018.0072 · Cited by 26
Trust-Your-Doctor: A Simple Heuristic in Need of a Proper Social Environment
Wegwarth, O., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0003 · Cited by 20
Heating up the debate? Measuring fragmentation and polarisation in a German climate change hyperlink network
Häußler, T. (2017) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2017.10.002 · Cited by 19
Transitions between polarization and radicalization in a temporal bilayer echo-chamber model
Gajewski, Ł. G., Sienkiewicz, J., & Hołyst, J. A. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.024125 · Cited by 21
Social responsibility and stakeholder influence: Does technology matter during stakeholder deliberation with high-impact decisions?
King, R. C., Hartzel, K. S., Schilhavy, R. A. M., Melone, N. P., & McGuire, T. W. (2009) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.11.004 · Cited by 19
Simple Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Social Behavior
Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0001 · Cited by 20
Alcohol and previous acquaintance: Mood and social interactions in small groups
Lindfors, B., & Lindman, R. E. (1987) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1987.tb00757.x · Cited by 19
Gaining and losing social support: Momentum in decision-making groups
Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., Hansen, C., & Hymes, J. A. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(87)90028-x · Cited by 19
Democratic Deliberation Within
Goodin, R. E. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.003.0009 · Cited by 16
Group Processes Affecting Anticipated Language Choice in Intergroup Relations
Taylor, D. M., & Royer, L. (1980) · Language · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-024696-3.50032-6 · Cited by 19
Issue importance and group choice shifts: A persuasive arguments approach.
Madsen, D. B. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1118 · Cited by 19
The Valence Model Unveiled: Critique and Alternative Formulation
McPhee, R. D., Poole, M. S., & Seibold, D. R. (1981) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1981.11923849 · Cited by 19
Determinants of group-level overconfidence in teams: A quasi-experimental investigation of diversity and tenure
Meißner, P., Schubert, M., & Wulf, T. (2017) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.002 · Cited by 18
Why Rational People Polarize
Dorst, K. M. (2019) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 18
Political polarization: Radicalism and immune beliefs
Almagro, M. (2022) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537211066859 · Cited by 21
Cognitive perspectives on opinion dynamics: the role of knowledge in consensus formation, opinion divergence, and group polarization
Mueller, S. T., & Tan, Y.-Y. S. (2017) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-017-0004-7 · Cited by 19
Flexibility, Argumentation and Confrontation. How Deliberative Minipublics Can Affect Policies on Controversial Issues
Ravazzi, S., & Pomatto, G. (2014) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.212 · Cited by 21
Infostorms
Hansen, P. G., Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2013) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12028 · Cited by 18
Unanimous versus Majority Influences on Group Polarization in Business Decision Making
Williams, S., & Taormina, R. J. (1993) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712137 · Cited by 18
Buying group choice: The effect of individual group member's prior decision frame
Stoddard, J. E., & Fern, E. F. (2001) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1002 · Cited by 19
Aggression: Interaction between individuals and social groups.
Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1993) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10123-006 · Cited by 18
Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism
Lamberth, J., Krieger, E., & Shay, S. (1982) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(82)90003-4 · Cited by 18
Politics and Prejudice: How Political Discussion With Peers Is Related to Attitudes About Immigrants During Adolescence
Bohman, A., Hjerm, M., & Eger, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00070 · Cited by 20
The ‘tarrant effect’: what impact did far-right attacks have on the 8chan forum?
Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. (2020) · Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression · doi:10.1080/19434472.2020.1862274 · Cited by 17
A New Opinion Polarization Index Developed by Integrating Expert Judgments
Koudenburg, N., Kiers, H. A. L., & Kashima, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738258 · Cited by 21
Young men’s likelihood ratings to be sexually aggressive as a function of norms and perceived sexual interest.
Edwards, S. R., & Vogel, D. L. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0035439 · Cited by 17
The Discovery of Group Polarization
Moscovici, S. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2860-8_5 · Cited by 18
Thought Suppression, Projection, and the Development of Stereotypes
Newman, L. S., Caldwall, T. L., Chamberlin, B., & Griffin, T. D. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2703_7 · Cited by 17
The Language of Extremity
Swol, L. M. V., Prahl, A., Kolb, M. R., Lewis, E. A., & Carlson, C. L. (2016) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x16629788 · Cited by 19
The Process of Political Decision-Making in Groups
Kirkpatrick, S. A., Davis, D. F., & Robertson, R. D. (1976) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276427602000104 · Cited by 17
Use of Small Groups inInstructional Evaluation
Clark, D. J., & Bekey, J. (1979) · Cited by 17
A Study on Group Decision-Making in Software Architecture
Rekhav, V. S., & Muccini, H. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture · doi:10.1109/wicsa.2014.15 · Cited by 31
Diplomacy by committee: Assessing resolve and costly signals in group settings
Wayne, C. N., Mukaigawara, M., Kertzer, J. D., & Holmes, M. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12892 · Cited by 16
War Duration and the Micro-Dynamics of Decision Making under Stress
Stanley, E. A. (2018) · Polity · doi:10.1086/696359 · Cited by 16
Group polarization calls for group-level brain communication
Hou, Y., Zhang, D., Gan, X., & Hu, Y. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119739 · Cited by 17
WHEN PAIRING REDUCES SCARING: THE EFFECT OF DYADIC IDEATION ON EVALUATION APPREHENSION
McGrath, L. (2015) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919615500395 · Cited by 16
Group Members as Actors and Observers in Attributions of Responsibility for Group Performance
Wallace, D. M., & Hinsz, V. B. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496408326576 · Cited by 15
Interacción entre estudiantes y aprendizaje en grupos pequeños
Webb, N. M. (1984) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.1984.10822049 · Cited by 16
How Affectively-Based and Cognitively-Based Attitudes Drive Intergroup Behaviours: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Consistency
Zhou, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Wang, E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082150 · Cited by 16
From Individuals to Group Members: A Dialectic for the Social Sciences
Knowles, E. S. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9469-3_1 · Cited by 16
Challenges in Virtual Collaboration
Wainfan, L., & Davis, P. K. (2004) · Cited by 16
The Psycho‐Ecology of Armed Conflict
Winter, D. D. N., & Cava, M. M. (2006) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00437.x · Cited by 16
GROUPTHINK THEORY AND RESEARCH: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING IN GERIATRIC HEALTH CARE TEAMS
Heinemann, G. D., Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/0360127940200106 · Cited by 16
Judicial Decisionmaking: A Behavioral PerspectivePreprint
Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 16
Individual judgment and group interaction: A variable perspective approach
Ono, K., & Davis, J. H. (1988) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90027-1 · Cited by 16
Deliberative democracy: The effects of participation on political efficacy
Nabatchi, T. (2007) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 15
Polarization from the perspective of ambivalents: Feeling caught in the social crossfire of the U.S. abortion debate
Ton, G. M., van Zomeren, M., & Stroebe, K. E. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2990 · Cited by 15
On the Motivations to Seek Information From Artificial Intelligence Agents Versus Humans: A Risk Information Seeking and Processing Perspective
Liao, W., Weisman, W., & Thakur, A. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241232993 · Cited by 17
Information sharing and group efficacy influences on communication and decision quality
Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2009) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9183-y · Cited by 15
Research Design
Smith, E. R. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.006 · Cited by 17
A Quantitative and Content-Based Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Counter Narratives on Affective Polarization in Online Discussions
Borrelli, D., Iandoli, L., Ramírez-Márquez, J. E., & Lipizzi, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3094775 · Cited by 20
On the Motivational Primacy of the Individual Self: ‘I’ Is Stronger than ‘We’
Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & O’Mara, E. M. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00142.x · Cited by 15
Polarization on Social Media: When Group Dynamics Leads to Societal Divides
Rychwalska, A., & Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.263 · Cited by 15
Populist polarization in postcolonial Philippines: Sociolinguistic rifts in online drug war discourse
Uyheng, J., & Montiel, C. J. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2716 · Cited by 15
Interaction in Small Groups
Kelly, J. R., McCarty, M. K., & Iannone, N. E. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_14 · Cited by 17
Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgments
Hale, J. L., & Stiff, J. B. (1990) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934219009367507 · Cited by 15
Estimating joint preference: A sub-sampling approach
Arora, N. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.09.001 · Cited by 15
A Framework for Explaining Aggression Involving Groups
Meier, B. P., Hinsz, V. B., & Heimerdinger, S. R. (2007) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00015.x · Cited by 15
A Bayesian model of group polarization
Bordley, R. F. (1983) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90151-4 · Cited by 15
Consumer acceptance of irradiated food: A study of symbolic adoption
Sápp, S. G., & Harrod, W. J. (1990) · Journal Of Consumer Studies and Home Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.1990.tb00043.x · Cited by 15
Responsibility attribution by groups and individuals: The effects of the interaction episode
Forgas, J. P. (1981) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420110106 · Cited by 15
Communitarian perspectives on corporate governance
Ridley‐Duff, R. (2005) · SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) · Cited by 15
Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies
Parker, A. M., Nelson, C., Shelton, S. R., Dausey, D. J., Lewis, M. W., Pomeroy, A., & Leuschner, K. J. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e660202010-001 · Cited by 15
Political Partisanship and Anti-Science Attitudes in Online Discussions about Covid-19Preprint
Rao, A., Morstatter, F., Hu, M., Chen, E., Burghardt, K., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08498 · Cited by 15
Multiparty Interaction Between Humans and Socially Interactive Agents
Gillet, S., Vázquez, M., Peters, C., Yang, F., & Leite, I. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3563659.3563665 · Cited by 16
Noncompensatory Dyadic Choices
Arora, N., Henderson, T., & Liu, Q. (2011) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1110.0667 · Cited by 14
Reflexionsspiele
Albrecht, S. (2010) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/transcript.9783839415221 · Cited by 16
The Selective Communication of Political Information
Ekstrom, P. D., & Lai, C. K. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620942365 · Cited by 17
Bias in social interactions and emergence of extremism in complex social networks
Nguyen, V. X., Xiao, G., Zhou, J., Li, G., & Li, B. (2020) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0009943 · Cited by 14
Social Psychological Explanations of Political Inaction: Citizens’ Perspectives in Brazil, Hungary, and the Netherlands
van Bezouw, M. J., Závecz, G., Penna, C., Rijken, A. J., Klandermans, B., & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2019) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12189 · Cited by 17

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks